alpha2cen

I do not know the value. But, if neutron velocity is about 500~ 5000 km/sec, we will see the fluctuation of the decay rate. In the case of 5000km/sec, the fluctuation will be very high. But, below 500km/sec the fluctuation will not be so high. Detail calculation is required.

All data are not used for the model calculation. The selection might be impossible without using super computers and their network system.

1/0 = infinite means 1/0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000...001? Is there no difference between 0 and 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000...001 ? Is 1/0 infinite or calculation impossible?

If we have neutron speed data in the instrument, we will estimate more exactly about the phenomena.

Because of the earth rotation, the data change would be irregular. The moving direction of the neutron might be changed every hour. The position of the instrument(latitude) on the Earth and neutron moving direction might influence on the direction change. Earth revolution effect around the Sun is within +- 12% of the Galaxy rotation.

Neutron speed can be increased or decreased.

How about looking at this figure? Fast neutron speed make errors.

How about this? Higgs potential energy del E del E = mc2- (r m c2 - mc2) =2mc2- r m c2 modify del E= 2 f( r )mc2- r m c2 where f( r ); function, whose independent variable is r when v=c, f( r )=1/2 r , del E =0 v=vi, f( r )=? v=0, f( r )=1, del E = mc2

Does the fast rotation of a particle or a object cause a time dilation? For example neutron star. Neutron star has high gravity and fast rotation.

Standard deviation of the lifetime might be key factor. Let's think about this case, neutron speed is not so high than earth movement. If neutron speed is high, standard deviation value will be high. If not, standard deviation value will be low. Two methods are low speed decay method. Storage technique seems like a little more slow speed than beam technique. It seems like absence to do an experiment to measure neutron lifetime with it's velocity.

Universe model sphere surface the Universe model, balloon surface expansion A. Serebrov et al., PLB 605(2005)72. storage technique M.S. Dewey et al., PRL 91(2003)152302. beam technique

Recent data says fast moving neutron life time is long, and the standard deviation of the fast moving neutron is large than slow moving one. The standard deviation is caused by earth movement effect around the Sun plus the Galaxy rotation? More exact knowledge will be obtained from the model calculation and experiment data fitting .

Does the distance/time from the center change when the balloon volume is increasing ? Is the cooled neutron decay rate the same as the fast moving it? Does cooled neutron decay more fast than fast moving one?

According to the accelerated expansion theory, in the future the Universe will move more faster than now. At that time our atom stability is the same as the present one? At present, if we test single neutron decay rate at the high speed, how will be the decay rate? Will the rate became fast or slow?

Figure representation 1 ------------------------------------------ 1/2 ------------------------! 1/3 --------------! . . 1/0.5 ---------------------------------------------------!-------------------------------------------------- 1/0.25 ---------------------------------------------------!--------------------------------------------------!---------------------------------------------!---------------------------------------- . . 1/0??? Imaginary . . 1/2 -------------------------! 0.5/2 ------------! 0.25/2 ------! . 0.00000000000001/2 ! 0/2 ? 0/0 ? How to draw the Figure? 1/0, 0/2, 0/0

After inflation, many atoms are created. Based on current knowledge, which step is correct? A) quark, gluon -----> proton, neutron, electron -----> H, D, He, Li B) quark, gluon -----> nucleus + electron -----------> H, D, He, Li C) quark, gluon -----> pion ---> --> -->H, D, He, Li D) other reaction path

Bio-organic material is not stable. It can easily degrade by high energy light. Living organisms have mechanisms to repair the cells against these light exposures. Nature is more cleaver than our thought.

Stability chart is correct. The remainders are in progress.

Bio-diesel or bio ethanol is more easy way. These methods are environmental friendly methods to obtain energy. To obtain bio-energy form plants or trees, making lignin digestion enzyme cheaply is important step. If we obtain that enzyme easily, we can easily transfer natural bio-products into ethanol. Among the solar-light power generation, solar heat power generation method is most economical method. Till now solar cell power generation does not have so high economical profit. In the future, deserts, where now useless land, will be important energy generation places.

The New theory in the paragraph means other new theories of the beginning of the Universe. Till to find out what is the Dark Energy, we do not know which theory is exactly correct. At the present we think Big Bang theory is more reliable. The theories are here A) Big Bang theory + Dark Energy B) Parallel Universe C) Steady state theory D) Holographic Universe E) Another theory1 of the beginning of the Universe. F) Another theory2 of the beginning of the Universe. .. etc..

There is a stability chart about atom. Fe is the most stable atom. http://en.wikipedia...._binding_energy But I have not found the equation about the nuclear stability yet. A paper tried to solve this problem by using electron charge stability in the nuclear. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/68124-how-charge-is-distributed-in-nucleon-nucleus/page__view__findpost__p__694690 Neutron stability give us some doubt about the origin of the atom. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/67290-dark-matter-and-dark-energy/page__view__findpost__p__696163

Is this logic exact? A) Universe expansion, CMB-->Big Bang theory ---> Universe accelerated expansion ---> Big Bang theory + Dark Energy B)------ " --------------------->Big Bang theory -------------------------> " ----------------------------> New theory of beginning Which one is correct ? Which one gives the answer? Answer B) is speculation.

How to make a nucleus of the galaxy at the beginning? Do you have any good idea about making energy condensate in the space? Big Bang theory tells cooling makes highly condensed state. Unknown tachyon phenomena!! What is the evidence? I do not understand the relationship.

If particles get over the electrostatic barrier, the particles are easily fused by nuclear force. And then, they will go decaying or maintaining their structure depending on their energy state in the nucleus . Two proton binding state is very unstable, so it can easily decay into other particle composition.

Without having a step to be a neutron , quarks become nuclei composed of neutrons and protons?