alpha2cen

It was difficult to find a nucleus, even the object is very condensed state, i.e., solid. ***Rutherford's experiment*** Thinking about a satellite, it is a way to increase the collision frequency to Dark Matter particles. Another method is to make a DM particles at the particle collider. But we do not know such particles really exist in the nature. Under ground method is more easy than satellite method. But our finding will be only rely on Dark Matter particles movement.

In the past, how difficult to find a nucleus in the atom, even existed in the solid gold! ** Rutherford's experiment ** Does DM have so condensed state??? Theoretically using a fast moving satellite is a good way to find it. But protection against other high energy particles or high energy ray from the space is a problem.

Is there any evidence that steady state theory is true? For example, far away galaxies are not so red shifted, etc.. Observed results or experiment results are important to say that. To make the theory into main stream, all observed data must fit that theory.

Such methods give you no help. As possible as , you'd better do it by yourself.

Unit conversion of equations is more complex.

Does Gravity constant have the same value anywhere in the Universe? How do we know it?

Thank you for good answer. It seems that much effort was established to obtain that picture.

Fg=Gom, or Fg=G'm where G'=Go+bm Is the constant b always 0 no matter how big the mass size is?

Is Gravity constant linear to the amount of mass? For example A mass 1 object........................................ B gravity A mass 2 objects......................................2B gravity .. .. A mass 1*10100000 objects....... 1*10100000 B gravity Two problems. 1mass is A kg, total units is 1*10100000 . Total mass is 1*10100000A? Total Gravity is 1*10100000B?

Many research have been done about the Galaxy formation and the structure of it. Galaxy formation is related to the origin of the Solar system. Do we have a recent paper or a report about that theory?

Photoelectric effects? How to describe photoelectron emission?

Which direction the Local Group Galaxy is moving now? If the centre of the Galaxy is right side, which direction the Local Group is moving? Does CMB have no effect from that moving? The CMB picture, which was reported, was modified to eliminate that effect?

The objects in the Space Station Fg=(G ms mE)/r2 Fc= - ms r (omega)2 Fg+Fc=0 ms; mass of the object in the Station mE; mass of the Earth r; distance from the center of the Earth Any object is on this force equilibrium state. Ep_earth= Ep_stationary local basis + Ep_local translation + Ep_galaxy revolution in local group + Ep_galaxyrotation + Ep_earth revolution + Ep_earth rotation About 0.000005 Ep energy might be increased. The translational speed of the Local Group is not precise, yet. The more reference is needed.

No gravity state in the International Space Station comes from the interrelationship between the centrifugal force and the Earth gravity. A particle energy in the Earth is very high than one of the stationary state in the Local Group.

So, no gravity in the space comes from the force balance. Actually, there is no place which has not gravity in the Galaxy.

Mass definition problem. It is the difference among the energy basis, the force basis and the mass size. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/67847-proper-mass-redux/page__view__findpost__p__692040

How to calculate the rotation of the Earth make it's orbit more stable when it revolves around the Sun? How much drag force of other planets is different whether the Earth rotates or not?

If Higgs field really exists, The possibility of the existence of another kind of multiverse might be realized. This is the multiverse which is based on the Higgs field barrier. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/67828-super-higgs-field-universe-and-twin-higgs-field-universe/

Till now, known things about the Galactic centre is a super massive Black Hole. Do we have other examples, i.e., the generation of matter at other galactic centre?

Earth energy fraction(assuming self rotation is 1) self rotation----------------------------------- 1 revolution around the Sun------------- 9000 revolution around the Galaxy------- 625000 revolution around the local group--- 900000 Direction component is ignored.

About the mass definition. Which one is the more exact definition between the energy basis and the force basis?

According to the standard model, when we are closed to the speed of light, we suffer big resistance form the Higgs field, the repulsive force suppresses particles move freely. We can explain this phenomena differently with other theory.

Have we obtained that heavy atoms fraction is increased with time? At the inflation period heavy atom fraction is zero. Time: :::::::::::::::::::::Big Bang-----inflation----------------------------------------------------------->current Universe. Heavy atom fraction::::zero............zero.........?....very low....low.....small.....medium.......>increasing Do we have this kind of data?

About 8.3 times higher than the revolving speed around the sun. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth

Mass definition problem? Which one is mass? 1)E2=m2C4+p2C2 m=1/C2.(E2-p2C2) 2)P=mv m=P/v P; momentum 3)E=(1/2)rmv2 m=2E/(rv2) 4)F=ma m=F/a 5)Fg=mg m=Fg/g 6) another equation m=..