alpha2cen

Light speed does not change at any circumstance. Is it a fundamental component in the Universe? We can change light frequency, but not change light speed. Whenever the energy is high or low, it only runs the speed, C. Even very tiny energy state, it only runs the speed, C. It does not have any tiny activation energy for travelling. Why such state is possible?

Is the speed of light outside of our Universe the same? If not, the light pass, i.c., vacuum will be an important basic component of the Universe. We have not known the difference of the vacuum component between in and out of the Universe. The something we only know is the world, Dark Energy.

We do not exactly know how light travel through the vacuum space. First, we consider light as a particle. According to Newton's 1st law, it seems like no problem moving through the vacuum space. Can we apply Newton's law of motion only moving at the speed of light? Then, we consider light as a wave. If so, how does the medium work during moving in the vacuum space?

I changed a little. "The cause of obtaining mass and the cause of obtaining gravity are the same." http://www.gravityresearchfoundation.org/pdf/awarded/1971/motz.pdf

Gravity charge field main concept. The universe is composed of gravitational charge field. Property of the field. A particle in there has a mass. A particle in there has a mass comparable gravity. We definite m.g^0.5 as a gravitational charge. Gravitational charge in the field has a gravitational force, F=(m1g^0.5)(m2g^0.5)/( r^2). r: distance between two objects. The cause of obtaining mass and the cause of obtaining gravity are the same. Above all is the main stream.

Light is a wave, too. If light were not a particle, we could not explain photoelectric effect properly?

Does a Higgs field have a gravitational force? Gravitational charge field, I'd like to say, is a field which a particle or a object in the field has a mass and a mass comparable gravity simultaneously. Mass giving step is the same as the gravity getting step, I suppose. The cause of getting mass is the same as getting gravity. It has only attractive force depending on the charge size. LHC experiment results will make everything clear. If Higgs finding is absolute... Mass and relative theory will make everything clear?

So, the universe is composed of gravitational charge field. We have not known the field property quite well yet. LHC results will tell whether it is true or not.

We do not know the detail process about giving mass to a object. But the getting mass process seems to related to getting gravity. General relativity has no problem to say like this.

Why do two masses have a property to draw each other? Light , which has no mass, has not such property. It likes to spread through the space. Something is affecting around a mass object. If they are too apart , they will have small influences each other. But If they are close, the interactions between them is high. So, I dare suppose" a phenomena, mass giving to objects, is related to this phenomena." Macroscopically we call it Gravity.

Why gravity is proportional to mass? Graviton?

Neutrinos are not easily destroyed with matter. So, there will be much neutrinos in the space. Are there any place where neutrinos disappearing in the space?

But anti-neutrino comes from the neutron decay process. Matter makes neutrino (for example, fusion reaction), but it has no interaction with matter. Do we have anything wrong?

Neutrino can pass through the Earth. Are neutrinos not affected by Earth underground material? But neutron can not penetrate through the Earth. What is the difference? Stability?

According to general relativity theory, in the very high gravity Black hole, the existence of void space is no problem. But some problems remain. Which state does Black hole exist? Many neutrons or black hole particle or many quark gluons, ..., which state is correct? Does mass and gravity have a proportional relationship at the high gravity region?

How can we recognize the Black Holes, which are not feeding, through the telescope in the space?

Time is a physical definition like mass and length. We can make our time by using a clock. Atomic clock is used for measuring our time. Why do we use the atomic clock as our standard time? We live in the atom(containing electron, proton, neutron and photon) based word. And until now, atomic clock has fitted well on the predicted value of Relativity theory.

Do not use this kind of sentence. That's meaningless. ==> That is no meaning., I do not understand the meaning. Try using words instead of lines and arrows. ==> How about using a detail sentence instead of using figure?

According to Relativity theory Black Hole center <----------------------------dragging-------------------------- electromagnetic wave(for example microwave) *************************gravity force

The microwave, i.e., electromagnetic wave is dragged by Black Hole.

CMBR is a light long wave. It is one of radio micro waves.

What is happen at the very high Gravity region? Total gravity = light attraction force + something???----> very highly empty state.

Think about light bending and gravity. Intensity of Gravity...0------low--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->high Related phenomena..-----no affected ------small bended ---highly bended----critical bending --What happen?(light speed increase? critical bending? other phenomena?)---->

Let us think about Black Hole. Near Black Hole, Is it an empty space light can not travel? ----------Black Hole center ----------surface -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->radial direction ----------very high mass region(Black Hole) ------light can not travel region ---------light bending region ------------light no effect region

Light does not have no moving state, and always move only the speed of light, C. @@What is a mass? F=ma. At a light we can not change an acceleration. So, light does not have a 0 mass, but has no mass.