alpha2cen

Except photon particles can travel a speed from 0 to C. Photon does not have no moving state, and always move only the speed of light, C. @@What is a mass? F=ma. At a light we can not change an acceleration. So mass concept is important.

What is a light? long wave--------------------------------------------------------------->short wave low energy-------------------------------------------------------------->high energy --------------I.R. , visible light, U.V., X-ray, Gamma-ray---> one light ==> photon Why it does not have a mass? Is it in the no mass action region? First we think about a mass.

How to make a total vacuum? Do we make a vacuum space which has no Casimir effect?

How do we assume past history of Milky way galaxy and Andromeda galaxy?

Till when have Milky way galaxy and Andromeda galaxy had their own mass? And, when they have attracted each other?

Are there any empty vacuum space through which light can not travel in the Universe? Do we have any information about it? Are there any Dark Matter which has such property?

Black hole -----------------> very big gravity --------> even lights are dragged Supernova explosion ---->minus gravity state ----> every matters repel each other.

Is the light speed faster than normal C near the supernova explosion area? I mean negative time-space curvature.

At the supernova explosion, is the light speed the same as light speed C? We know light can not escape from the black hole. why? Very big gravity blocks the light up to escape from there. How about the gravity at the supernova explosion? Is the gravity a negative state, i.e., minus gravity? If so, the light speed is faster than normal light speed C near the supernova. This means that the supernova 1987a had a small time difference between the light arriving and the neutrino arriving.

We know the gravity well. Then, Is the gravitational constant always constant? Is the present gravitational constant same as that of 10 million years ago ?

If CERN's time-lag is short than before, real neutrino arriving time may be shorter than announced data. Because OPERA's measured time has a time-lag too.

Does solar neutrino affect a decay rate of radioactive material in the Earth? If so, what is the reason?

How long is the time-lag at the CERN to detect the signal? time line ----------------|||||-----------------------------|||||--------------------------------------------------------------|||||-------------------||||--------------------->>> event ------------neutrino leaving---------neutrino leaving recorded-----------------------------------------neutrino arriving-------neutrino arriving recorded Is the time-lag very short?

The experiment would be done very accurately, but the measured time range is too short. How accurately can we measure the starting time? Are there any time lag to detection from the neutrino starting point to the time recorder? To detect the signal, enough neutrinos or something must hit the detector. I hope the neutrinos really did break the speed of light. But...

Theoretically the two points detection results are the same. But the two point detecting methods are different . How about making a new start detection point far from the CERN about 1km away?

How to detect the neutrinos at the CERN? How about changing the start detection point? generate neutrino ->----------||-----------------------------------------------------------------------------||-------->--- ======CERN===start detection point===========================end detection point(Gran Sasso) Is this method difficult to carry out for money and time? I also think they deeply think the experiment over .

Can we detect main stream neutrinos? I know we only can detect very few of them. What is the best way to increase detection sensitivity?

Theoretically I have thought about this before. How about seeing this site? #11 http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/59477-why-light-speed-is-constant/

Yesterday CERN scientists found new particles which are faster than the speed of light. And this is my opinion "How to find the undetected waves? I think the speed is very fast. After Big Bang Inflation spread in a few second, and the Dark Universe spread to entire Universe. In order to detect such fast wave, I suppose, using the very high energy state. One of the method is using Black Hole. There would be some waves which escape from the Black Hole. High gravity of the Black Hole might delay the speed of the unknown high speed waves, like attracts light waves." Reference yoctosecond, Sunday, July 31, 2011 7:05 PM http://www.myspace.c...x=2&SortOrder=0

Is the speed of light always constant at the beginning of our Universe? Can we find any difference between past measured data and present data? If there are some deviations, we can find new phenomena about our Universe. The problem is how accuate the past data is.

How do we know the electron speed is 0.999 999 999 997 c? It has probably some velocity distribution. Is the average velocity at the maximum 0.999 999 999 997C? If we constructs more bigger diameter hadron collider than LHC, we only change the 12th number under the decimal point. Is it right?

At the string theory, we think particles as string, i.e., waves. Then, at the very high speed state we can observe the particles' wave length are very short than low speed state. So, if particles are waves, the physical property may be changed.

How fast can we move particles by using current technology? And, do we find any physical property changes at that high speed? Are there any experimental limit to increase a particle speed? We know electrons or protons are usually used for making very high speed particles.

The concept of rotational Universe is related to the shape of Universe. Does Universe have another kind of force to hold all galaxies together?

Are we in the fixed frame? Are we in the hologram Universe? Is the Universe a phantasm? If not, why light speed is constant?