alpha2cen

We do not know how fast our Galaxy moving at the fixed point which is not moving in the Universe. Where is the fixed point? So we do not know weather we over the speed limit(light velocity) or not.

In fact we do not know how fast we are moving. We do not know the fixed point in the Universe. Is the light speed limitation in the relativity theory an observed value at the fixed point in the Universe?

Earthquake is one of the factors.

Does the high blue shift increase energy consumption when the space craft moving to the galaxy?

Does very low temperature give no effects on computer operation?

Much high energy gamma -ray are released when supernova explodes. Then, are around supernova explosion much matter or antimatter are created in the vacuum ?

Maxwell equations are relationships between electric current and magnetism. Are there more primary cause of magnetic field generation? Why does electric current through a conductor make magnetic field? Are there any property against the electric current in a vacuum?

This concept is some different. The main point what I state is the difference between arithmetic calculation and real life calculation. Arithmetic calculation should be done by using nondimensional number. If not, the result gives us some confusion. So good problem solving procedure is like this. make equation--->transfer dimensionless form --------> calculation ------>transfer dimension form----->result

I have heard that measured very strong cosmic-ray energy is about 3x1020eV. The energy can be calculated from this equation. T=1/(E/h) =1/{[ ( 3x1020eV )( 1.6x10-19J/eV)]/ 6.6x10-34J.s}=1.4x10-35s T; period E; energy h; Planck constant

According to general relativity theory anything can not move fast than light speed.

Our galaxy has maintained spiral style. But it is very large. How does it maintain a fixed shape? We know gravity speed is same as light speed. And, our galaxy diameter is known as about 100 thousand ly.

Every one knows well electric current makes magnetic field. Then, why does electric current make magnetic field?

Our consciousness is related to time. Whenever the electromagnetic waves moves on our brain, we have our consciousness. So consciousness is not continuous, but intermittent. We do not recognize it because the time gap is very short.

I have heard about detection of very high energy cosmic ray, but not heard about 10^-43 seconds detection. Do you have any good literature about it? High energy cosmic ray, according to my supposition, is only energy detection, not wave detection. Pulse distance of the ottosecond electromagnetic wave is only 3A.

How about change like this, i.e., "element x union of A and B or element x intersection of A and B, and x is aij or bij." A={a1, a2, ..., an}, B={b1, b2, ..., bm } a1={a11, a12, ..., a1n1}, a2={a21, a22, ..., a2n2}, ..., an={an1, an2, ..., annn} b1={b11, b12, ..., b1m1}, b2={b21, b22, ..., b2m2}, ..., bm={bm1, bm2, ..., bmmm} Example A={red car, blue car, red orange} B={red car, blue car, blue dress} A (red)cup B=? A element red car={red, car}, blue car={blue, car}, red orange={red, orange} B element red car={red, car}, blue car={blue, car}, blue dress={blue, dress} A (red)cup B = {red car, red orange}

We can learn mathematics during the school course, but can not learn many programming languages. And more developed thinking is comes from mathematics. If programming language were more mathematically developed, we could use it more developed work easily. But present program language is developed for special programmer, i.e., highly educated programmer.

The language which has been developed before is difficult to learn. We learned summation at the school. But computer uses do , for, etc., similar expression. I think that the program language more closed to math book is ease to learn.

We usually use cup , cap, etc. operations. But, this operation is a cup against something or a cap against something. There are many fruits, i.e., an apple, an orange, a melon, etc. But they are all fruits set. Airplane, car, ship , etc., are made of metal, so metal set.

Was this experiment done at the vacuum condition?

We can make light by using many electric instruments. But it is not light. Same logic is like this, i.e., we can make flame from burning wood, but flame is not wood. We need a direct experimental evidence of electromagnetic wave.

We can change polarity polarization of light by using organic matter.

p(a)=true has some problem. a={a1, a2,...}, p(ai element {a})=true It has some different element property against generally used set. But how do we define number set or polygon set? This is not a number set, but a concept set.

It is more better the elements have their property words or common name, i.e., food, house, car, etc.. The properties are like this. Smell, color, age, hardness, darkness, feeling, etc.

A={red car, blue car, red orange} B={red car, blue car, blue dress} A (red)cap B ={red car} more defined A cap B={red car, blue car} U- (A (red)cup B )= {blue car, blue dress} I think we use this operation every day.

A (car, apple)cup B= (A (car)cup B ) cup ( A (apple)cup B) ={red car, blue apple, blue car, red apple} A (a, b, c, ...)cup B = (A (a)cup B) cup (A (b)cup B) cup (A ( c)cup B) cup ... Practically we use this operation very much.