alpha2cen

Is this concept wrong? How do you explain the antimatter existence?

How about using more precision compiler? JavaScript call--->external compiled program with more precision compiler. Is it possible?

These are the calculated results from the expansion models. 1) At the beginning from the some area, i.e., Inflation and expansion. a) Constant accelerated expansion http://blogs.scienceforums.net/alpha2cen/2012/12/13/constant-accelerating-universe-mathematical-solution-for-the-telescope-observer/ b) Constant speed expansion http://blogs.scienceforums.net/alpha2cen/2012/12/18/constant-speed-expanding-universe-calculated-results/ 2) At the beginning from the one point a) Constant accelerated expansion http://blogs.scienceforums.net/alpha2cen/2012/12/16/one-point-accelerating-universe-calculated-results/ b) Constant speed expansion http://blogs.scienceforums.net/alpha2cen/2012/12/16/one-point-accelerating-universe-calculated-results/ Calculated expansion style; from the redshift data and the space expansion model http://blogs.scienceforums.net/alpha2cen/2012/12/24/space-expansion-model-universe-expansion-graph/ The steady state Universe model was also calculated. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/71791-light-interaction;-calculated-results-about-the-steady-state-universe/#entry720407 Decelerated speed expansion cases are not calculated yet.

From the above equations. [latex]\frac{I_{c}}{I_{t}}=\frac{E_{c}/tA}{E_{t}/tA}\cong \frac{h/\lambda _{c}}{h/\lambda _{t}}[/latex] This equation is modified. The model is in the below Figure.

From the next figure model we can claculate Redshift value. In this model, we assume that the cause of Redshift is the interactions between the light and surround something. So, we can apply modified Beer Lambert model. [latex]Z=\frac{\lambda _{c}}{\lambda _{t}}-1[/latex] Beer Lambert law [latex]\frac{I_{c}}{I_{t}}=e^{-kd}[/latex] [latex]\frac{I_{c}}{I_{t}}=\frac{E_{c}/tA}{E_{t}/tA} \cong \frac{h/\lambda _{c}}{h/\lambda _{t}}=\frac{\lambda _{t}}{\lambda _{c}}[/latex] [latex]\frac{\lambda _{c}}{\lambda _{t}}=e^{kd}[/latex] [latex]Z=e^{kd}-1[/latex] From known data Z=1, L=6 k=0.09 So [latex]Z=e^{0.09d}-1[/latex] where d=13.75-L d; distance(Billion year) More detail picture presenting below Z=2.

This is a calculated result from the well known data. Reference http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2012/dec/05/ancient-gas-sheds-light-on-universes-first-billion-years http://astro.wku.edu/astr106/Hubble_intro.html etc..

This is a more detailed space expansion model.

No, the pressure is always constant. The piston has no friction. The initial pressure is the sum of mg/A and atmospheric pressure. where, m is mass, g is gravitational constant and A is area. There is no reason to be changed the pressure during the process.

But, after Inflation the model fits well. And, other expansion cases are in this Figure.

To obtain correct expansion diagram, more exact Doppler effect estimation is needed.

From well known Redshift formula, we can draw a diagram about the Universe expansion. Other factors, i.e., Doppler effect, etc. are ignored.

Redshift value change is too high. How to explain the dropping of the value from 11.9 to 5?

Tiny particles movement. But, is it in the range of the continuity fluid dynamics?

Redshift value depends on many factors. Doppler redshift is one of them.

Was it built right after Big Bang? If that kind of system did not exist, huge amount of micro Black Hole might be generated. Such system makes the energy density per unit volume not be high? Photon carrier concept can easily explain many things. 1) Low temperature(below 10K)radiation. 2) Particle wave duality. 3) Constancy of the speed of light. 4) Easily explaining the energy transfer between the light to molecules. (light to molecules, light to electron orbit, light to nucleus) 5) Micro Black Hole rarity. etc..

The something, which makes the light travel to the speed of light?

Short length visible waves did not appear. But, long length electromagnetic waves appeared.

How do we calculate the age of dim star? Are there no scenario from the beginning to the present?

Red shift value did not appear in the past post. Without any acceleration, the expansion or contraction speed can not approach to the certain value. Always initial velocity is zero.

These are redshift apparatuses. Two experiment apparatus have the same result? Upside apparatus is a Doppler shift experiment apparatus. Downside one is a space expansion apparatus.

I have found a reference material about early Universe star. But there is no coment about red shift. http://phys.org/news/2012-12-stars-universe-million-years.html How do they calculate the age of early Universe ?

Near Inflation, the receding speed of the faraway galaxy is not so high. 0-------------->speed increasing So, if we see the faraway super cluster, we can see slow moving dim supercluster. Is it really? Or, it is a nonsense? http://blogs.scienceforums.net/alpha2cen/files/2011/02/core-calcu.jpg http://blogs.scienceforums.net/alpha2cen/files/2011/02/Core_universe.jpg

The details are like this. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/70266-redshift/#entry717865 Think it again. Which one is correct among them?

What is the cause of cosmological redshift? There are three cases in the Figure. Think about it again.