alpha2cen

This is a reason that mass must have it's inertia region. If there were not such region, background basic field strength should be very very strong.

In fact the process explaining is not easy. No specialist can not understand well. This is the process diagram.

My link I think empty space does not have no property, but has some basic properties. Inertia is one of them. In the past, we only thought inertia is only energy conservation form. If so, how can we explain 'light travels the speed C'.

Current knowledge might be related to between mass and Higgs field. More research will be needed. If there were no upper limit, gravity force would be increased continuously with mass amount. In the case of small Black Hole, the inertia breaking off property is concentrated in the small area.

inertia breaking off = increase acceleration Relative theory increase acceleration ---> time dilation

Relative theory does not say why space time deformation phenomena happen. The theory says the amount of space time deformation, and it's relations.

This is only the cause of gravity force. Time dilation is another story. More theoretical related equation research will be needed. This concept says gravitation force does not have big difference than acceleration. Without introduce graviton, we can easily explain gravitational phenomena. We observed light is affected by gravity in the past experiment. So light has very very thin inertia region around it.

Without degrading lignin, we can do cellulose hydrolysis. First lignin separation and do hydrolysis, or without lignin sparation do hydrolysis.

how about comet destroyed phenomena?

No one says a cause of the Gravity directly. This is one opinion.

Lignin degradation is always a big problem.

[latex]\frac{P_{1}V_{1}}{T_{1}}=\frac{P_{2}V_{2}}{T_{2}}[/latex] V=constant [latex]\frac{P_{1}}{T_{1}}=\frac{P_{2}}{T_{2}}[/latex] [latex]\Delta P = P_{2}-P_{1}=P_{1}\frac{T_{2}}{T_{1}}-P_{1} [/latex] [latex]\Delta F=\Delta PA=(P_{1}\frac{T_{2}}{T_{1}}-P_{1})A [/latex] P1=101.3x103Pa, T1=273+22=295K, T2=273+4=277K if A=1m2, and we ignore water contents. F=6580N is required.---directly open the refrigerator like opening the wine bottle with a cork opener.

Other method is PSA(pressure swing adsorption) method. This method uses MSC(molecular sieving carbon). MSC contains very small nano pores in it. Large molecules movement in the pore are more slow than small molecules for their size.

v=(2C tcurrent -2Linitial)(1/t) -2C Can we know the speed of a supernova 1billion light years away from the Earth? (distance to 1billion away supernova)at the present /( distance to 1billion away supernova)right after Inflation <? What is a mistake to solve this problem? I could not reach the right answer.

This is one of the N2 separation method from air. This method uses very low temperature.

This is a proton-proton collision model.

This is a constant rate expansion case. v=(C tcurrent )(1/t) -C t<--1billion year, v calculation. Obtained value is speed b So near first 1 billion away Super cluster moving speed is v1=b 2billion away Super cluster moving speed v2=2b 4billion away Super cluster moving speed v4=4b 8billion away Super cluster moving speed v8=8b 16 billion away Super cluster moving speed v16=16b In this model we can not see Superclusters before 6billion years ago. Any my calculation mistake? For some hidden mistake, I can not prove acceleration expansion is right.

Strait line calculation method. We do not know Supercluster's moving speed 1 billion light years away. So we use the light which begins 1billion years ago and arrives at present. v=(2C tcurrent )(1/t) -2C t<--1billion year, v calculation. Obtained value is(t1, v1) From the obtained (t1, v1) value we calculate gradient a a1=v1/t1 For calculation we think about the Universe model. The model is like this. At the big bang, every Super cluster attached at the one point. --------000000---------- Some billion years ago ----0---0---0---0---0---0---.. At the present -----0--------0--------0--------0---.. So near first 1 billion away Super cluster moving speed is v1=a1t 2billion away Super cluster moving speed v2=2a1t 4billion away Super cluster moving speed v4=4a1t 8billion away Super cluster moving speed v8=8a1t 16 billion away Super cluster moving speed v16=16a1t

The speed of the Superclusters, which is 10billion years away from the Earth, exceed the speed of light C. If we can see the Supercluster outside of 10billion years, one point accelerated expansion might have a problem. Observer line calculation method tcurrent =t+L/C tcurrent=t+(Linitial +(1/2)vt)/C where (1/2)v is average velocity value from Big Bang to a point. Solve above equation to the v. v=(2C tcurrent -2Linitial)(1/t) -2C one point expansion Linitial=0 v=(2C tcurrent )(1/t) -2C v; speed of expansion(1x1022km/billion year) C; speed of light(9.46x1021km/billion year) t; time(billion year) tcurrent; current time(13.75 billion year)

This is a constant expansion case. The expansion started from one point. From this graph, we can not find any difference between no acceleration and constant acceleration.

How about redshift gradient of supernova1a s in the very far away Superclusters ? Redshift gradient is very big or small, which one? Redshift gradient = |(redshift2 - redshift1 )/(light intensity2-0.5 - light intensity1-0.5)| Redshift gradient far away superclusters (>>>, >, =~, <, <<,?) Redshift gradient near super clusters

More precise picture of #13, constant acceleration case.

This is a constant rate expansion case. Method of calculation of light arriving time. arriving time = light leaving time + (distance)/C = 13.75billion years 8a Super cluster case t8a+distance 8a/C=13.75billion years 16a Super cluster case t16a + distance 16a/C=13.75billion years(2012) Observer line calculation [latex]t_{current}=t+L/C[/latex] [latex]t_{current}=t+(L_{initial }+vt)/C[/latex] [latex]v=(Ct_{current}-L_{initial})\frac{1}{t} -C[/latex] [latex]v=A\frac{1}{t}-B[/latex] [latex]t_{current}; [/latex] current time, 13.75billion year [latex]L_{initial}; [/latex] initial Supercluster distance from the Earth

This is a constant accelerated expansion case. Red line is an observers line. The origin is Big Bang point. Redshift = receding speed effect + universe expansion effect. This chart is not a red shift chart, but a receding speed.

Our observing method through the telescope.