Mike Smith Cosmos

I think the whole notion of Sine x at school was a bit mystifying. However when seen as a point , going around a circle extended in time , coming out as a wave , takes all the mystery away. No wonder most things in the Universe are : Either a ) ROUND b) Going round in a circle c) Spinning or have connotations of d) Waves

I like it ! " get out and hit the rocks with a hammer; see the lie of the land;" Yes please ! That would be just Great for our next meeting/discussion . I wondered where you had gone, I thought you had fallen into a mid Atlantic trench ! Talking of which this morning I painted an interpretation of Richard Fortey's Book " The Earth an Intimate history " Pages 200-215. He describes ficticiously being in a satellite just before Pangea split , with the formation of the Atlantic. , looking onto the Appalation mountains at the back of New York. beyond would be seen the peaks of Newfoundland, Behind that the mountains of Ireland, Wales, The lake District and Scotland ( Calidonian) and still further East.Nor East the Scandinavian mountains, All Stuck together. Then Pangea split between Newfoundland and the UK forming the Atlantic Ocean and the Rest. ( is history ) Just a symbolic impression.

Wolfhart, I have been trying to get my head round your experiment in 60;s About the Electron and the two traces , one 690 ns after the other, or before the other, proving something about causality. Could you go over that, with a bit more reasoning. Thanks. It is all very interesting. Mike ( Greetings back from Devon )

Marc Great Pictures of Devon and Sw England. If you zoom in you can probably see me at the computer I will Wave ! Give some words of an introductory overview of Geology , as we can go forth into the subject and the field in the south west.of England . Remember the University of the third age ( means People over 50 years old. ) This is your moment to change peoples lives !

Surely , this containment of hydrogen as a fuel , is not an unsolvable problem. For what could be at stake here , with hydrogen fuel gained from plant material. Fuel cells are so good at producing electricity to power electric cars. And Electric cars if produced in large numbers could be easy to produce , cheap, easy to use, no pollution, no noise, fun etc . Perhaps at this juncture we could slow the speed, redesign the look, redesign all sorts What a lovely thought ! .

ONE THING SEEMS TO JUMP OUT AT ME from your paper. . " In spite of all the progress in physics this problem has not been solved in the last 100 years. " That is interesting, really interesting. You are saying an electron needs some form of nudge if in a floating state. I have been introducing this under another word ' initiative' . I have tried to illustrate this particular phenomenon of an outer orbit(energy band) electron , jumping down to the lowest orbit(energy band) and giving out a photon. Illustration found at :- http://www.scienceforums.net/index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_rel_module=post&attach_id=4698 I agree that the electron needs some form of bump or initiative as I call it to jump to the lowest band. In my picture illustration MAUVE to RED. I have illustrated minute threads like those proceeding a high voltage electric discharge, whether these are some form of virtual particles or virtual electrons ' trying out ' a probability in mass numbers, I don't know. But then the electron jumps (or changes energy band) . Having to give up energy , I have illustrated the germ of a Photon ( perhaps virtual), Then 'ignition' of photon illustrated by a minute star with probability wave attached ( just an illustration. ) Then photon rushing off at the speed of light. I Think in your article Hypothesis you are saying you put your weight on total causality. I am putting my thoughts and proposals as a mix of causality and probability, as the mechanism of physics. Again only an illustration :- From Left to Right [ Causal lines ] [ Probabilistic Splay of various probabilities ] [Causal lines ] . becomes reality ---------- only one becomes reality---------- becomes reality .

I have just started a Geology Group in the South West of England in EXETER . It is part of The University of the Third Age. We are enjoying ,in the initial weeks , seeing how Devon and the south west of England fit into geological history. I am not a Geologist but am enthusiastic for understanding of our Earth and the processes behind its formation. One of our members expressed the desire to know the setting of Geology of the Earth, as a whole, whats it all about Rocks,? Volcanoes,? Earthquakes,? Going out into the Field with a hammer?, or what ?, Its easy to plunge into specific detail of areas of Geology. But they are asking ' Whats it all About. ? Does anyone have a nice 'Succinct way' ( having had time on your side to get to grips with what its all about ) of explaining What Geology is all about ? This is so that we can discuss it in our meetings. . Exeter is a few miles from where I live. As the above simple map shows some of geological surface rock strata that are within easy reach , easy access, so we can go on field trips, which we will start shortly. But they would like a succinct explanation of the setting of it all , before we get bogged down in details. ( Rocks, fossils, eras, millions, billions of years ago.) . I do not know too much about it yet, but a local young research archeologist / geologist who said there was evidence of lava flow locally . We must go and see. This does show the need the group has for an overall setting .

Well , there are a good few things that you brought up, each of which could be discussed at length. Which I am more than pleased to. However, as you have asked initially about " I am a bit confused about what exactly you are trying to associate or state in your post here." The whole thread is about a Proposed Theory of Everything. Not just combining or not the basic forces as many associate with a Theory of everything TOE but Probably mistaken by me I originally (1980-1990) thought people were looking for The real thing , the whole shebang, the Theory of the whole D.. Thing. So, much to a little bewilderment by some of the readers, whether rightly or wrongly I have tried a bite at the whole shebang. Namely really EVERYTHING. Life , the universe and everything including life ,or consciousness BEFORE the big Bang. Literally EVERYTHING including dare I say it whatever form Consciousness existed before the big bang.(Pre-bangrian ), and whatever else was there.! Believe it or not it took a bit of working out: I reasoned that for any One First principle , to cover everything that was to follow, without assumption had to be. Quote by Mike Smith Cosmos There was nothing around at all , so this nothing could present no reason for anything or everything to occur. Now if this was not the fundamental principle .. then nothing would have been able to occur. So there would have been nothing and we would not be here to talk about it. Now if this was the fundamental principle then anything and everything , could and did occur. Who ever got there first was by definition God over everything. If this was consciousness this is where I have to be careful that I don't get struck down ,on the one hand by God for misrepresenting Him/Her , and or on the other hand being Smote down by moderators saying this should be in another thread. The trouble is , if I am addressing the Big Everything , I really can't avoid this issue , as it must of necessity be part of the everything. However if this upsets your sensibilities ( or anybody elses ) then we can quickly move on to What comes next. Now however it did occur as far as I can reason it out on the observation of how the rest of the universe works, before an effect there appears to be an "initial something" , and because this can originate by both animate or just material form ( in the broadest form Matter and field ) , I call this "initial something " [initiative]. So for our next second step : Quote by Mike Smith Cosmos Now at this stage we are talking a big lot of Space. No restrictions , no reason for things not to occur. BUT however it was done " some form of initiative for it to occur" Pretty smart stuff ... the Big Bang Banged and we have a fairly good idea as to what happened, from quantum soup, to plasma , to higgs field to force separation to quarks, to neutrons, to protons and electrons , ..................to recombination and as they say the rest is history. However, in this great miasma of goings on , because of all this advent of STUFF, whether this amounted to quantum fields ( which I believe these are a major part of the " how the cosmos is being made " ) , to paticles , waves and whatever else. A new 3rd fundamental principle arose. Quote by Mike Smith Cosmos So really all this stuff started interacting and in some ways provide " reasons for things not to occur ". And so the science we know today and the part of 'science we have yet to know' came into play. But I am saying that the first two principles hold true. Which they must if they are right. And so things still try to find ways first of "having no or little resistance or avoiding reasons for things not to occur. ( path of least resistance ) ( even none like super conductors or rockets in low earth orbit. ) . I think we are just starting to touch and make good use of 'the science we have yet to know' . This is where quantum fields come into play together with all their wierdness, or more to the point their operation which is often counter intuitive. My looking for spaces is all tied up in this, because I think a lot of these spaces belong in or with the quantum area. ( like things work a certain way when observed or touched and a different way when not observed ). {I do not want to be touched ! } Particularly by a moderator ! I have a bit to go yet. And so I propose we have it : Quote by Mike Smith Cosmos And it works . From the beginning of time to the birth of the Cosmos and beyond . What more do you want ! And from here on in, I can generate countless examples of how this theory works with todays devices, everyday happenings, Astronomy, geology , electronics , Human consciousness, However Quote by Mike Smith Cosmos

That was the problem with the ethenol replacement for petrol . I wonder wether this perhaps could be developed more fairly for the human population ? . . ####### Build a happy life # Under the Sun ########

Surely we could grow and harvest any photosynthesis bio product. Anything that sees the sun . No? Maybe we can't charge around like idiots all the time, but surely that's not a bad thing. Living within our means. The sun only gives so much energy per Square meter usable land area. We will just have to ration out use of this new clean energy, instead of squandering our restricted resources.

That is Utterly amazing. From here on in the world will change. The game change is on . AT LAST the first and most abundant element in the universe HYDROGEN can at last be released from plant matter, economically, cleanly and at reasonable temperatures with little or no pollution. ! Yippy the break from fossil fuel is here. The age of hydrogen Fuel cell powered cars are upon us. And More beyond ( see end caption ! ) PAPER SCIENCE DAILY ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Apr. 3, 2013 — A team of Virginia Tech researchers has discovered a way to extract large quantities of hydrogen from any plant, a breakthrough that has the potential to bring a low-cost, environmentally friendly fuel source to the world. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . . THE DAYS OF PEACE AND PLENTY WILL SOON BE UPON US ! . .

Low Earth Orbit Any Ideas for a good clear space where things can Happen ? It does not have to be in outer space( though it could be ). Could be at your finger tips, in your thoughts, it could be in the centre of a piece of scientific equiptment., but it does need to be pretty clear for the Initiative to operate in. (Forces can be balanced out). It is fun to think and work out where they are.

RADIATION IN SPACE OF RADIO WAVES Applying this to the Theory of Everything , to see WHY it Works so well. After a 100 years of development of techniques in Radio transmission, roughly speaking signals are produced as a waveform ( INITIATIVE you thinking the words and speaking the words in your mobile phone ) are changed into electrical currents. These are changed into electro-magnetic signals of sufficient frequency ( vibrations per second, 100's of millions per second). These E-M (Electro-Magnetic signals Travel down transmission lines in your Mobile phone hand piece to a small internal Antenna . Local or nearby E-M fields are generated in the space near your mobile. Then at a small distance away, (called the far field ) AND THIS IS THE AMAZING BIT the E-M fields become self perpetuating and hare off into space as Quantum Bubbles of Electro -Magnetic Waves at 186,000 miles per second (300.000 Km/Sec) to your nearest Cell Phone network Receiving station. probably on top of some large Mast. Then a reply from whoever you are talking to ( as they INITIATE a reply to you) in the reverse direction, namely via the mast antenna to your mobile phone. Why does this work so well ? Because through SPACE ELectro Magnetic waves ( in Photon Form ) have no reason why they cannot move through space (so they happen, no reason not to happen, will happen ). And if there was no obstruction ( reason not to happen) in a particular photon's direction, it would continue to travel to the far edge of the universe. ( so we are led to believe ! ). It is only you , who have to put energy in to your mobile phone by the battery, and the Cell phone network who have to put energy into their Transmitters. Once the photon bubble of E-M waves is produced it goes through Space with no further requirement for energy ( no reason for it not to happen ) for ever ( humm for ever ? well ! ) Thus Electro magnetic waves as described by James Clark Maxwell work within the description posed by the Theory of everything. This is the thin thread through space. YOU could not follow it as you are not in Electro Magnetic wave form ( at least not yet ! ) Should you require to read in more depth then see following Reference . Ref :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The secret is, in all of this, to find the spaces. Not where everything and everybody else is but where there is clear space where things can happen . . If you want to know where more of these spaces are ,where exciting things can happen if..... . . I am your man . As I am on a quest. Who said Science was not fun. . I am probing deep into Pre-cambrian Geology, . I am probing the Pre-Bangrian Domain, and . I am following a Photon of radio frequency Electro-Magnetism on its way to the Edge of the Universe. . What more do you want ? . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ..

I had a think about the Human Consciousness issue. Peter . Last year I painted a sequence for the very important growth to human consciousness in contemplating and seeing the Cosmos as per Paul Davis. Starting from the big bang and a hint of before. Through the Geological column to Human Consciousness. Quickly applying this to the theory :- 1 st cube illustration of pre Bigbang domain. 2nd cube 4 dimensional space time Post Bigbang domain + . Probably a bit hasty, but illustrating it coming from before the big bang ( Pre-Bangrian ) Joke I hope you are going to feed this lot into your computer algorithm when you get it up and running ' Popcorn ' . It will probably come up with '43' ( Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy) and then wipe ME out of existence ! I owe you a promised subject from this list:- 1. Mechanical Movement by Plate Tectonics 2. Movement of sea waves and light photons. 3. Mechanical movement of heat . 4. Radiation in space of Radio waves. 5 Electron orbital/energy band change. 6. Viral and antibody attack . 7. Quantum tunneling . I think it was 4. and 5 . I will start with 4 ... RADIATION IN SPACE OF RADIO WAVES and how this works within the framework of the theory of everything I have proposed earlier. :-................................................................

Peter, Will try to reply to these four comments of yours. a) consciousness. I agree is very fundamental. I have read a lot of books by Paul Davies including I think his book Mind of God. If I remember he too put Human consciousness very high up the list of fundamentals. Two or three points I would bring up at this juncture as regards consciousness. As you and others have commented that the theory I have put forward does not contain specifics ( say consciousness, or whatever) . When coining it , in order to cover "Everything" I had to sweep out to a phrase that covered this namely "anything or everything " hence As Examples :- So things like God, Metaphysics , all the Pre -material Universe things tend to be in 1. Whereas 2. concentrates on why and how easy or hard things happen. Many of the calculations of the physics of material behavior concentrate in 3. True for an individual issue , say consciousness I personally would need to go away and think " how does that fit in with the theory and make explanation as to why/how or whatever which way Human consciousness exists or behaves. I will do that , and see what I come up with. It will probably involve , flipping from 1) to 3) to 2) Your b) physical mechanisms There are probably a couple of reasons for this . one I personally am a physics man, I have spent most of my life working with problems that involve physics type problems, underneath (not on top) I think in mechanistic ways. Two I have been trying to use examples within this forum and to individuals that tend to look at things in science based ways. If I was at a party with some art type people I would probably couch my ideas in a different form. Although at the moment I seem to be struggling. Your c) unfair on physicists I actually thought it was me having a hard time. My motives for putting this theory forward , apart from my personal satisfaction with the theory , Was that I do find it works . I would like others to know of it and try it out. IF this is one of the ways the universe works, its not my theory, its just a principle as to how a lot of things work, [if not everything ] whether I have put it into words or not. Your d) should be controversial I thought it was fairly controversial That God can be explained if necessary. That something as immense as the Big bang and the creation of the material universe could suddenly come into a completely,total empty void.That positivism and negativism is explainable as a type of human behavior which has an explanation. That negative feedback systems are present in the geological systems keeping our earth a suitable place to live. ( that is if we dont b.. them up.). That great things are individually and en mass possible if we FIND the right INITIATIVES in the right location. ( a place and space where anything or everything can happen , if there is no reason for them not to happen. Not just any old place.) Clue IBM used to instruct their salesmen in ( remove all the objections to why someone should NOT buy their computer system . Then they WOULD buy) Serendipity Our Jack Russel ( Called ' Sweetie' ) has just gone and eaten my glasses while I am tending to my post.!

Peter . In my 20's at college, while studying Electronics, on the side I read up on some of the philosophers like Berkeley, Decarte, and Laplace. Some were saying ' Everything beyond your fingertips could be an illusion' , others that ' the universe was a massive clockwork machine that theoretically if you had the computing power of a God you could predict the future of the whole universe both past and future '. These and others could send your brain into a spin. I took a rain check on all of this and got on with life,and all that life was to throw at me. Over the years I have developed my own ' picture of things of how things are ' as best as I have been able, based on observation and the whole compendium of everybody else's ideas as I have read, seen or conversed with others. I am now nearly 70 which sounds a lot but is only (,up to 10 a child, up to 20 getting to college, to 30 getting into life, 40-50 marriage and life begins at 40, 50 and 60 career development, 70 I am here. eek ( Where did it go?). All I know for certain is 'Ones' ideas develop. All I have ever wanted to know is " What is this Whole Cosmos all about ? " Thinking back to those early days and their philosophy. I do not think the world beyond my fingertips is an illusion. Its real and its amazing . Its not a giant clockwork machine unwinding. Its playing a cosmic symphony of incredible depth, unpredictable in many many parts, yet driven by an interesting regulating set of systems. Although I am utterly convinced, its not like one of my designed electronics prescriptive circuits, there is far more to it than that . I would love nothing better than to understand how , in principle , does it work.? So the search goes on .! .

I don't get it. When I read my own words about 'The Theory' or the recent interpretations of ' the theory', I get excited, thrilled at the consequences and in awe at the magnitude and intricacies of the machinery of the cosmos. I see lines of least resistance or no resistance curving and swirling through the cosmos, working to keep the whole thing going. I see individuals battling there way to make things happen that the universe resists for all sorts of scientific reasons, I see some getting hold of these threads and riding/surfing the cosmos by riding the threads. If your motiffe has any relevance I would have thought you too would see that. Perhaps I am not explaining myself well enough by using such generalized terms in my theory without giving more detailed examples of the threads ?

I wondered where you had gone. ! 125 cc BSA bantum was Start machine when I was 16 y. The first time I took it to bits, I found that the previous owner had left out the circlips that keeps the gudgeon pin in place. gudgeon pin holds the piston on. Needless to say it had worn nice slots in the barrel of the engine. Performance was abissmal . you could get off and walk quicker. my last bike was a Honda Cx500cc shaft drive. It was like riding a bucking bronco. Boy did it like the open road. I've retired with a Honda Lead Scooter. Fun and very pedestrian ! Mike ( thebike)

That's a tad sweeping. May be under a current paradigm of what makes early 2013 science earn the title "science". If we were to take a bigger perspective and think of today's science as the surface of the earth science and tomorrows science as the science of the sky, then tomorrows science will need a new Paradigm. What works for analysis and prediction on the earths surface, could be seen as far more predictable than craft in the sky. And then again a further paradigm shift when going into space. So that we don't trap the expansion of blue sky research on the ground so that it CANT take off more easily, perhaps we could relax the strictures slightly to allow for new theories in their infancy. I am proposing that for any initiative-goal pair, there exists a thread , or pathway which CAN link and allow the expediting into reality of the initiative providing :- The potential, at the initiative, across the 4 dimensional space-time region , is higher than that potential at the goal. IF it is not, then more potential will need to be given to the initiative. The initiative will pick up anything required to achieve the goal on its journey along the thread. To not change its nature, the initiative would only require minimal input to move across space-time at a thread of equal potential. This last sentence is applicable as Isaac Newtons first law. I hope you appreciate to look at the idea of " A theory of everything" I have had to leap all the way to the other end of the spectrum and go figuratively to the EVERYTHING edge of the Cosmos.

No I did not predict it, not really. I knew from experience, and from observation , leading to part of the theory ,that for most things in your life that you want to happen , come "From taking the first step". Hence the 'initiative' bit of the theory. But I had a formulated theory, much as quoted above ,but in one sentence. I was laying on the pebbles ,having just swam in early morning sea water 7 am ,cold, but the sun was warm. I lay back ,alone, no one to be seen anywhere for miles to the right and similarly the left. Just Pebbles, more and more pebbles. 10 meters down the beach it turned to flat sand. I was thinking about the theory, as I was more musing about it in my mind to do with astronomical and other physics things that pointed to the theory idea. O.K. I said to myself "smart ass " If this theory is right, try it out. Now. I sat upright and said " I want a perfectly round stone " The first step, the initiative. Now what ! Do I sit here and wait for a round stone to drop out of the sky on my head, 'i asked myself' What do I expect. My reasoning being ,that with all these millions upon billions of stones, and all the erosion processes gone toward making all these pebbles , it seemed to me that there was no reason in the whole world why there should not be a perfectly round stone somewhere in these billions upon billions of pebbles. No stone fell on my head. Oh well I said to myself . Theory is shot. To my right and left every 25 meters or so old wooden groins decended down toward the sea edge some 50 meters at this time. They use them to stop the beach washing away. These were old and in bad repair. In fact I could see through the groin to my right to the flat damp sand beyond the groin. It was perfectly flat sand but there was a rather strange little pile of three pebbles all on its own. Odd because the third pebble was on top of the other two. As I clambered through the wooden groin I could see more clearly, but they were just three ordinary every day random pebbles ( except that one of the ordinary pebbles was on top ). As I got near I could now see a forth pebble that was hidden from view before this time. Oh my giddy aunt IT WAS PERFECTLY ROUND . This is the one in the photo uploaded. I paced around in shock... Mike you are a scientist. This is just coincidence. I spent many hours pacing up the piles of stones looking to no avail to find such a stone by searching . Thus started a whole series of testing !

I walked past a garden this morning in south Devon. The owner was tending his border, looking for shoots. We passed the time of day discussing a late spring. " eye lad twill be t' longest day in couple of months! What yer tink ow that ! ".

. . [ I have previously proposed the Hypothesis as a potential Theory of everything: ]- Quote I undertook a First experiment back in the late 1980,s , which I have described earlier. I have continued to conduct and observe evidence for the theory over the intervening years. Here is a photo taken today of the EVIDENCE of the first experiment conducted in 1980,s ......................................................... The following is a copy of the earlier post at the starting page of this thread:- Page 1 ( A Lingual theory of everything) :- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Well funnily enough , The first experiment I tried out my theory was with one of those Billions and billions of chances for something to happen. I was sitting on a beach, in the south of England at 7am one morning, having just had a refreshing early morning swim. I looked at the beach to the left of me and the right. It extended uninterrupted for miles in both directions. The top part of the beach contained billions and billions of pebbles of all sorts of shapes and sizes, smoothed edges by erosion. Step 3 . I started the initiative " that I wanted a spherical stone" say like a golf ball. Step 1 I was at a location in space and time, where step 2 ' there was no reason why this could not occur. Billions of years of eroding history on rocks, and billions of pebbles. I have the pebble , to this day . Round, Spherical, Size of a Golf Ball. If you like , I will photograph it and upload it. You might well ask how I obtained it. However There was Space ( Space and Time ) for the pebble to be eroded to shape .......1 Step1 There was a thing to happen that there was no reason for it not to happen .........2 Step 2 . There was As I Raised it, The Initiative ( in this particular experiment ) .........3 Step 3 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ There is your Hypothesis, There is your Experiment. There is your Test. There is your Evidence. All-be-it that it spans humungus numbers and time, nonetheless the evidence is there, you can touch it ( or at least I can ) you can look at it, its solid evidence. ! ( Score 1 to me , 400 to you. At least I am trying ) Michel, only just got round to posting the evidence , sorry a bit delayed . Too busy trying to fathom the whole shebang out ! Mike

My initial experiments with the theory were with physical things and the human consciousness. ( Mind ) In Principle , I was ,and still am in the "how science works mode" One makes observations. One makes an Hypothesis. One does experiments to test the Hypothesis. One evaluates the results. Adapt experiments . Make public the findings and results. Using this diagram. In normal life most of us ( apart from me now I am retired, go about the normal causal things of life. I did go to work, I did the business, so I got paid, we all consumed food we were housed , and so we lived. So far on the diagram I am at the first POINT in CUP. Now this is where I set myself up in a Test with large probability. Had I left it at that , the diagram shows approx 40:1 probability of reaching the next cup. But I made an initiative, in an environment where "there was no reason for it not to happen" whamo ! It happened. On to the next line of causal activity and on we go. For years and years, experiment after experiment. The Theory does not contain the details for the experiment, they need plugging in at the time. Feeling confident in the theory , I now look for examples of how the universe uses this system to function. Now it is no good saying " i want to win the lottery " as there are some 50,000,000 other people giving you reasons for it not happening for you. However if you think about it there are initiatives you can create ,if you are careful, that perhaps have no reason for them ,not to occur" now we are getting there, or at least nearer. IF you think about Creation. To Create, infers there was nothing there already ,or there was complete empty space for a universe, otherwise it would already have been created before. If the theory is right. There was no reason for things not to occur. So anything or everything can occur. However there does need to be an initiative. Once things exist , then there start to be things preventing other things occurring to some extent accept along " lines of least resistance " . Now as regards, who or what started this whole process off is up to the individual, as to a) Was it nothing ? Many people think this ! b) Was it some previously existing Super Civilization ? Some people think this ! c ) Was it God ? Many people think this ! This then is up to individuals to think about , talk about , and come up with their own answer ! If you want to go one step back from each of a) b) and c) that too is possible with the theory .

When I made a start on " A Theory of Everything in the 1980's " , I thought people were looking for a Complete Theory Of Every last darn Thing. I was very disappointed that what science was meaning at that time was a single theory which would combine all then known four forces ( Gravity, Electro-magnetism, the weak force, the strong force. ) . However I have always been interested in the Big Picture. So I set off looking for the biggest ever THEORY of EVERYTHING. To me there could be no bounds. So it must encompass All matter visible and invisible, the universe, God or anything that anybody cared to say might come before the big bang, from NOTHING, to pre-super civilizations that might have conducted some form of massive experiment to create a universe/s. see picture :- As current science tended to or appeared to concentrate or limit its theories to mainly calculation or mathematical prediction as the major basis for establishment. At least in the areas of physics that I was familiar with. I have always been attracted towards the philosophical , conceptual approach that many of the early masters brought some of the early basics to light. So took the choice to look for A Theory of Everything in WORDS as concepts first. The maths I believed could come later. What I believe I have come up with can contain the predictive, causal part, that conventional physics contains but I am of the opinion that we will limit our expansion of discovery if we do not think BIG. As illustrated above. I think that on whatever scale we look ( which I am happy to give examples to support the theory ) we will find a measure of causal , predictive classical physics , followed by regions of space and probability which are non causal even though often (not all ways ) navigable by statistics. See following illustration Note the left hand side shows predictive style ,causal ideas. This is followed by probability style progress. This is then progressed with more causal, predictive science. This is put in a simplistic diagram, but I hope illustrates the principle by which I believe the universe is working. whether this is at the quantum mechanical level of atoms or at the astronomical level of (as big as it gets ).

I totally agree with you , but I can not get anybody to agree with me that the whole universe is spinning about a center. Their opposition being , "spinning relative to what". ? I say it is just spinning , thus centrifugal force will thrust outward, like Kids on a spinning play ground apparatus.. !