DimaMazin

America needs to defeat Islamic State, but is incapable without Putin. Is it Great America ? Rather Trump needs Putin to defeat democracy in USA.

I am studiing differential calculus in KHANACADEMY. I will check SR later. If you know nesessary math then you can try to check it now.

Try to study Relativity of simultaneity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_of_simultaneity

Clocks measure more time in expanding space. Maybe time is an expanding space.

After the victory Americans will be losing ability to make science, therefore we should try to do science without their ability. Another countries should make less golden hotels and more scientific work.

Yes, we need no Trump. Sanctions are non-interference.

Trump is in political trap. Because he has right to not recognize president elections, therefore people have right to not recognize the president elections. If Putin creates political traps then not only Trump but and all USA get into his traps. Trump is just crass politician.

What will be military math if Trump will cause civil war in USA?

Some time yes, if Alaska will be Russian region. Why Putin creates nesessary weapon for destroy of USA?

Then why Putin attaked Ukraine? Putin wants Trump be a president because Trump can make USA weeker and Russia stronger by concellation of sanctions. Fight for leadership between dictators . Obama was lame duck because was partially trusting to Putin. Even do you think Putin needs free USA?

Americans use wrong math even for president elections, therefore Clinton has lost.Trump wants to have peace with Putin.But when Putin will attack America, Americans will obligated ferstly to kill Trump.

Like in Russia.

If Trump make crises, instead of Great America, then will Trump leave White House? I think Trump is like Yanukovych. And USA will fail.

t'd=t'+(gamma-1)x'/(gamma*|v|) x'= - x Then clocks simultaneity in S' is: t'=t - 2(gamma-1)x/(gamma*v) We can use it for definition who is accelerated relative to each other. For example if Andromeda age exactly defined and distance is exactly defined then we can define who is accelerated , Milky Way or Andromeda Galaxy. I think SR can not make the same.

Free UK isn't my enamy. Trump's USA will be my enamy.

You disagree on simultaneity. If you both are approaching you see blueshift. If you are escaping from each other you see redshift.

Don't complicate relativity by classical physics.

Lorentz factor reduces time there.But lorentz factor can increase or reduce frequency.Time doesn't tell about fraquency at motion in gravitational field.

Posted by Janus on 28 May 2016 - 09:13 PM "The time dilation factor for a clock in circular orbit ( as measured by a distant observer) is found by: where r is the orbital radius. This is what you get when you take the combined effect of gravitational and relative velocity time dilation effects found by. And substitute , the orbital velocity at r, for v" You can define different time like Janus defines, but how defined different time can help to define energy change of photon?

And don't forget to study fraquency/energy change due to velocity. Janus is very simple here: "Now for light,traveling in a vacuum which does not require a medium and adjusting for Relativity, we use where v/c is the relative speed of source and receiver measured as a fraction of the speed of light and is positive when they are approaching each other. With this formula, it doesn't matter which(source or receiver), is considered to be moving." Edited by Janus, 31 December 2014 - 08:45 PM.

v1 and v2 are any velosities.

vrel=v1v2 / (1+v1v2/c2) v1=c v2=0.8c vrel=(c-0.8c)/(1- c * 0.8c/c2)=0.2c/0.2=c

And so traveling object is contracted in clocks simultaneity, but isn't contracted in directional simultaneity. You can check it if your photons attack traveling object at directional simultaneity. Directional simultaneity of unaccelerated twin is clocks simultaneity of just accelerated twin. Therefore accelerated twin will have less time at meeting. But directional simultaneity always exists as increasing x at increasing time, even accelerated twin sees directiomal simultaneity of unaccelerated twin as increasing x at increasing time. Still my model looks mathematicaly correct . I see no meaninglessness.

Of course you can choose any directional simultaneity, then tick rate of clock ,which is moving for sinchronization, depends on your choice. Length isn't contracted in corresponding directional simultaneity, but it is contracted like velosity in clock simultaneity,which is real only for zero speed.

Let's consider such mathematical idea: Rapidness creates length contraction. Acceleration creates derectional simultaneity. td=t+(gamma-1)x/(gamma*|v|) Speed on directional simultaneity is gamma*v then. There later time(clock indication) on bigger x is simultaneous to earlier time(clock indication) on smaller x. Therefore traveling object has less time for travel in derectional simultaneity than in clocks simultaneity. Clocks simultaneity isn't proven because approaching clock can have another tick rate than runing away clock. Can rapidness be a reason of length contraction?