DimaMazin

And Russia doesn't fight against ISIL. Russia just increases a cost of Syrian oil.

If Republicans made mistakes then why Democrats didn't correct them? Why Islamic world doesn't believe Democrats too? Increasing of population should correspond to scientific development. When it doesn't conform then the population needs a war.

Even if tail and head are simultaneously accelerated in frameS and from frameS to frameS' then they aren't simultaneously stoped in frame S' Ttail=T head T' tail=T'head - gamma * v * length/c2

You + the refugees - Tar = weak folk That is better when Moslems are weak.

Terrorists don't fight against terrorists otherwise they aren't. Terrorists fight against citizens.

Yes. That thing is more useful than Russian or Islamic idiocy. Still France doesn't understand this completely. France should less cooperate with Russia and less to love Moslems.

The Islamic idlers are the problem of France. Donkeys shouldn't increase Islamic idlers in USA then they will be good.

NATO can defeat Russians in Syria. Russia is weaker in Crimea due to participation in Syrian war.

Propaganda doesn't feed people. More economic sanctions. Russian regions are losing people.

Indeed. I am bad guy for you, because I don't recognise policy of secular society without science development by useful.

Really International human rights don't protect anyone from terrorists. Moslems have spoiled their countries, now they spoil Europe. Europe shouldn't make a help for moslems instead of science. If you want to make experiment with Islam in Euorope then you should build houses for European refugees in USA first.

Any membership in religion should be forbidden.

European laws let people to be moslems. Islam let moslems to be terrorists against the rest secular world. It all is logic trap for backward people, which turns them into terrorists. I didn't demand to despise the group. Rather I was demanding to despise the politicians which don't forbid the religion in Europe.

Those,who need a help to be moslems, should search for the help in another place. Europeans shouldn't help those who help to terrorists. Fight against idiocy should be predictable because it should be always. Refugees should be obedient and they can be such when new laws exempt them from religious obligations.

Such religious idiocy should be banned in Europe.

Always religion can be dangerous for science development.We should use any people for development of science. Now we should use actions of islamic terrorists against their religion.

Excuse me Strange. But a,b,c aren't sides of triangle. They should be just derivatives from angles like factorial or something else. m2=m2 All is correct. I do make for equilateral triangle.

Area and perimeter.

Fatness of triangle=A/P2 A/P2=1/(a+b+c) We know that: When angles of triangle are 60,60.60 degrees then a=b=c=12/(3)1/2 When triangle angles are 45,45,90 then a=2 b=2 c=2*21/2 When angles are 30,30,120 then a=14 b=14 c=16*31/2 Can we make any actions(the actions should be the same for any triangle) with triangle angles to define a,b,c ?

Some features of a parabola Coordinates of the vertexThe x-coordinate at the vertex can be found by completing the square to put the equation in vertex form, or by differentiating the original equation, setting the resulting equal to zero (a critical point), and solving for . Both methods yield . Substituting this into the original equation yields https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parabola a=3 not -3 y= -24 - (-6)2/(4 * 3)

I know exact definition of time. Time is quantity of nonsimultaneity between two events. Nonsimultaneity is change of ability of distance to transmit signal.

See Janus's post about Doppler effect:http://www.scienceforums.net/user/222-janus/?tab=reputation&app_tab=forums&type=received&st=30 " Now for light,traveling in a vacuum which does not require a medium and adjusting for Relativity, we use where v/c is the relative speed of source and receiver measured as a fraction of the speed of light and is positive when they are approaching each other. With this formula, it doesn't matter which(source or receiver), is considered to be moving."

I exactly know that an observer doesn't see contracted gap between simultaneously accelerated rockets. Therefore you can't deceive me. Once you have admitted with brag that you were breaking laws of USA. Therefore it's not surprising when you make crime in science.

I thought observer makes math of moving object relative to own frame.And when observer can't make the math then he/she isn't a scientist.

Then all is in own frame and nothing is contracted. I don't understand such science .