DimaMazin

Simply you should use exacter equation of force For example F=Gm1m2/r2+Gm1m2/1020r 1020meters - distance of change

You even can't mathematically check it !

Change of motion direction of traveler changes wave frequency of photons which are reflected from the traveler. Flash event and any events of co-located observers are simultaneous.

Well, but event of change of color of co-located traveler exists. If the observers don't observe each other then how are they defined as co-located at the same time of flash event?

Then start of relative motion of O1 and O2 from co-location and start of the photons motion similarly are two events according to Einstein.

Yes and observation with measurement is an event.

Relativity of one event to different times of different frames is issue of simultaneity. Don't make axiom without math.

And so you approve that the flash is simultaneous in two frames and every observation of every of the observers is simultaneous in two frames.Let's check your math. to =0 - time of start of flash in two frames t1 - time of collision of O2 with light in O1 frame t2 - time of observation of O2 S - distance between observers and flash in O1 frame S' - distance between observers and flash in O2 frame t1=S/(c+v) t2=S/gamma(c+v) t2=S'/c t2=S/(gamma*c) S/gamma(c+v) doesn't equal S/(gamma*c)

One event of radiation and two events of reception.Three events.They can't be simultaneous in two frames because then math of indication of clock will be wrong.

I see more events.

The distance has less meters in O2 frame.The distance has more meters in O1 frame.

Lorentz factor has no thing to do with quantity of mass.

Gravitational field runs only with own master.

We can see light or shadow of past object.

Then lightning is motion of electrical charges with turning of their potential energy into kinetic energy ,which transforms atmosphere into plasma and creates sound wave.

Moving electric charges in ionized plasma are lightning.

and v2=c(velocity of light) is relative to the car.And Vt is velocity of the light relative to the initial reference frame Vt=(v1+c)/(1+v1c/c2) Vt=(v1+c)/(1+v1/c) Vt=(v1+c)/[(c+v1)/c] Vt=(v1+c)c/(v1+c) Vt=c

If photon has time of life then photon of very far object should have decay in vacuum.You can ensnare them and they after a while should die.

Try to use relative simultaneity and relative length contraction.

Then we should see products of decay of photons from very far objects .

Photon has no energetically inertial frame,but it can have particular inertial frame. Our clocks have some own kinematic slowing of time, it doesn't mean we have no particular inertial frame.

I would like to see the wrong equation of OP. You have forgotten contracted distances in light frame.The fastest spaceship motion has insignificant change of distance between the fastest spaceship and the Earth in light frame,though changes exist.

We discuss question about speed.We don't discuss energy question. I meant our speed is half of speed of light relative to light.

We are moving at c/2 relative to light.

No.Mathematically wrong thing can't be experimentally right in the same case.