36grit

My latest thought experiment. What is the difference between a wave and a particle, if not just the scale at which they are measured and calculated. That is to suggest that if the double slits were big enough for the wave to pass through, wouldn't we measure and perceive a particle? If the slits were smaller than the electron wouldn't we perceive a wave? My latest speculative thoughts suggest that scale is relative to the electromagnetic atmosphere that particles travel through. And that waves travel more efficiently through the space than particles because they do not require velocity, and/or acceleration time dilation and particles do. The theory, a) Waves travel in harmony with time. b) Particles are the result of wave cancellation by the timing of a foreign object that it must pass through. The experiment: Create a timing that an electron can travel on. Sound waves are common in the macro world that sets the scale, so we'll use them to vibrate a copper wire. The electrons flowing over the surface of the wire should harmonize with the sound frequency, (and each other) according to the timing of the vibrations. The result should be a cooler wire and a more efficient transmission of electricity. Let's hope it works!

So, how fast do protons vibrate in the nucleus of an atom?

Does the proton go from 0 to C in a single plank length?

I wouldn't be so sure. A true genius showed me this group of true genius' and blew my mind. I was not expecting it but this is the way. Maybe if just spin the sonic vibratory field?

Seems to me that, it depends on which side of the looking glass you're standing on. If energy is a property of mass and mass is made out of energy, Then isn't mass a property of energy?

Spin, wobble, and directional movement are all properties of momentum. One will effect the other and should be mathematically calculable. Alchemy: Well, I didn't say it would be easy, but If we took a lead atom and a hydrogen atom, lined up the disks perfectly parallel, perfectly harmonized the spin/wobble ratios and made the temperature of both compatible, then we should be able to press them together, or simply watch them merge. I think this model might be used to explain which photons enter a galaxy and which ones lens around said galaxy. Disk wobble frequency might also explain how magnets work, but I'm late for work. Will explain soon.

How do you define exactly what energy is? Is it merely a wave resonating in a vacuum at it's simplest form? How many types of energy is there that we know of?

If we could completely isolate a body of mass from all outside electromagnetic interference, and then re-arrange all of the electromagnetic components that make up that mass, to better fit a new position in the universe, and then dissolve the isolating field, the mass should quantum leap to it's new position. The flow is dark energy, that which expands the universe. If the universe is constantly expanding then all things must constantly re-position themselves to the point of least resistance. To look at the universe is to see the valleys of this expansion. I can't think of any other way to describe the model at this time.

I'd say that: the cloud of possibility is the electron who's scale is relative to the path of least resistance. The path of least resistance both through and around the filter is simply to turn 90 degrees. If experiments prove this theory correct then we will know that particle spins wobble and this is what creates the interference patterns. Wobble frequencies may even turn out to be at the heart of a new understanding of the strong and the weak forces. Once fully understood and mathematically calculated, we may be able to turn lead into gold using very little energy. May be worth investigation.

Time is the relative flow of least resistance within the electromagnetic universe. What do you think?

The reason for the experiment would be to see if the shape of an electron more resembles a disk than a ball, I guess. If the photons, or electrons, are parallel to the target on average, then the wave a possibility will show an interference pattern. And if the particles are perpendicular to the target, on average, we should see particle like pattern. If so, then the film we are using to detect the particle is responsible for the particles behavior and not the fact that we observed the particle. To understand the shape of the particle is vital to our progress.

According to my latest thought experiments the electron should always be a particle. How can it be anything else in an expanding universe? But the double split and countless other experiments prove that it is also a wave. The wave observation might be explained by a principle, whereby the cloud of possibility itself is spinning. Seems to me that this would explain the wave like properties we observe, if for some reason, it stops spinning when we observe it. Is it possible that the detector somehow changes the spin to be perpendicular to the target or perhaps stop the spin altogether somehow? I wonder what might happen if we turn the detector film at a 45 degree angle? I wonder if we could come up with different interference patterns if we used different gasses in the room. I wonder what the result might be if we put the film in the middle of the slits, both on front of and behind. I wonder if we could predict it's landing by using a magnifying glass to narrow the cloud into a more predictable landing. We might even be able to fry an ant with one, that'd be cool. Have any of these things been tried?

Freedom Of Religion. This is why you were born, for this we are. Mark Clayton Beal.

Gravity is a natural thing, it grows like every other tree in the forest. The birds and firefly light upon it's twigs and branches. A conduit for individual life, time and energy.

Double slit: The understanding of my thought experiment to date: It is complicated to put into words. 1) An instant of time (relevant to our frequency or perception) is one loop of the fractal formula z=zsquare+c. The universe is expanding one frame at a time according to this formula. 2) Infinite particles represent points on the geometric plane(s) 3) atomic protons represent one loop of expansion. They step from one frame to the next, this defines their position in 4d space. They are relevant to a single plane of the fractal geometry. 4) captured electrons represent 6 loops of expansion, their relevance can exist in several points within these 6 steps of expansion. still speculating,