Jump to content

hypervalent_iodine

Administrators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4586

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

hypervalent_iodine last won the day on March 3 2022

hypervalent_iodine had the most liked content!

10 Followers

About hypervalent_iodine

Profile Information

  • Interests
    Organic and medicinal chemistry
  • College Major/Degree
    Ph.D. in medicinal / synthetic chemistry and mycology
  • Favorite Area of Science
    Organic Chemistry
  • Occupation
    Postdoctoral research fellow

Retained

  • Empress of Everything

Recent Profile Visitors

113433 profile views

hypervalent_iodine's Achievements

Scientist

Scientist (10/13)

1.4k

Reputation

Single Status Update

See all updates by hypervalent_iodine

  1. mistermack

    On my recent thread on conspiracies, it was posted in the politics section, and it was about politics. As I said in the intro, SOME conspiracies are true, eg, Bay of Pigs, Watergate, plots to kill Castro, etc. All accepted history, fully documented and undisputed. A full list would be huge. 

    So why is this SUBJECT treated as rubbish, when some of it is verified history? Some are rubbish, some are not. 

    Today we have a journalist murdered in the Saudi Embassy being discussed on the news. Is it rubbish because it implies a conspiracy?

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. swansont

      swansont

      !

      Moderator Note

      1. You should have asked for evidence, rather that reasons why you think one is true.

      2. This is a topic that should be discussed in the forums, not in status update.

       
    3. mistermack

      mistermack

      It's put up to be shot down or debated or added to. My post was meant to inform people of new evidence and developments, and invite other views. A lot of people are not aware that the last official investigation concluded a probable conspiracy, or a second shooter.

      re 2. The thread was closed, so I couldn't discuss it in the forum. 

      I'm not whinging about a closed thread, I just think it's missing a chunk of history to exclude a whole class of discussion, but I can see the slippery slope downside too, as stringjunky pointed out. 

    4. swansont

      swansont

      !

      Moderator Note

      Closed in the forum means closed everywhere. Status updates are not a way around thread closures, or forum rules. And I was referring to the reason the thread was closed. It's not appropriate for status update.

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.