ed84c

well 5614, your the right side of the exchange rate to pay for it... I got a $20 changed to day for £9.87

so techincally it really isnt that much to do with the Transitor then, it is more to do with the PD over the Collector/ Emmiter. btw how did u find this thread?

Any Ideas (tried and tested plz not stupid theoretical ones that dont work)

No, as far as i understand it the Graph is a curving one, it becomes harder and harder to pull a particle as fast as light, the faster you are, therefore no.

Mabye Quantum Mechanics is incomplete?

well when people were theorising; the Sun went round the earth. Then people made observations and they found out they were wrong, that was the point I was making. We dont know what laws govern wormholes, I suspect even if it would appear to avoid needing rules, that we will find it does need rules.

How do you know, have you ever been in a wormhole?

adj; Not going straight to the point, round about. Is that right?

theyre selling them in Comet for £30 and Aldi had some for £20 http://www.kellyindustries.com/sounds.html

what are ferromagnets? Just Iron magnets?

i tried the IMO one and it seems to have speeded things up a little, muind you the speed is so variable it may be a while b4 i know for definate.

how much did it cost? Download Indiana Jones of Bearshare, it wil be the DVD version and therefore in 5.1

I doubt the ESA would have the interest for a $2 bn investment, in one thing. Remember we europeans are stingy

i dont see why not. There arnt any 'random' influences in this case, if thats what you mean.

Here is the formula then; E=GMC^2 G= 1/1-Sqrt (V^2/C^2) if V (velocity) = C (speed of light) Then G= 1/Sqrt 1-1 or intinitity. Unless M in the Equation E=GMC^2 then E will always = infinity. Now lets try above C 1/Sqrt 1-(V^2/C^2) if we say V= 2C then we get 1/Sqrt 1-2, o dear.

fixed

is there a reason for this ?

sorry, my bad english again

Do you have the electron arangements for these chemicals?

Well to go BACK in time you would have to travel faster the speed of light. There is a formula that stops you doing that; i will give it to you when the [math] a [/math] tags are working. As for wormeholes, i reckon we will discover a new physical law when trying this, one that prevents us from travelling back in time.

is finding aswers for you hw all you ever use this site for? ex- fy= gx + hy ex-gx= Fy + hy ex-gx= (f+h)y (e-g)x=(f+h)y x=(f+h)y/(e-g) there for for every x there is (f+h)y/(e-g) hope that helps

Is this a H/W question? If not, I think you may be confusing relative apearance with reality. Anyway X and Y would both experience (tiny) amounts of time slow, due to special relativity. therefore theoretically the model is not water tight because you may be able to work it out from this (theoretically) wait till Martin comes along, he seems to be an expert on these things.

well if you observe the electron then you know the electrons direction (i.e. towards your eye) so prosumably (as per heisenbergs UP) you cant know the position?

http://www.aqa.org.uk select your qualification and subject, then go to assesment material and download the past papers same applies for different exam boards (infact the sylabusses are usually similar so you can use a range)

electron volts= E of one e at 1V