Our teacher assigned us to different topics, in which we need to make a sort of book. It should have objectives, introduction, body of the report, generalization. I was assigned to ribosomes. I just need some help because I can't seem to decide on the scope of my report.
Yes, I agree. There is a high chance of failure in human cloning. One would take a lot of risk. In the future, this might me perfected. Still, a lot of people will object to it.
I guess. We performed this lab once in which we hydrolyzed starch into its components. The iodine became paler, from black-purple to red, then to orange. Well, starch turned into dextrins, and then to maltose.
IMO we evolve because of the need to evovle. Darwinists would say because of natural selection, and that is a pretty neat way to answer how and why did we evolve. But the question why is hard to answer since we can't prove it. Every animal is somewhat related to another. And we are closely related to mammals since we are also mammals. About the experiment of Miller and Urey, there is a logical argument against that. I think you should read it yourself because it is very convincing and will keep us informed of what's new in biology.
Can there be other reasons aside from a lack of nitrogen from the soil for the plants to have a stunted growth? Our class are planning to go to a bonsai forrest after the school year for a biodiversity research. I guess it would help to know.
I used my USB Flash Drive and transferred some files from my computer. Then later, when I have to remove the device, I noticed that the My Documents folder was already in my memory stick. I can't delete or transfer it to the computer. What might be wrong? I swear I did not send the folder to the Flash Drive.
So, I guess, environment accounts for the cell to differentiate depending on the organisms need to adapt. I think its a pretty complex process since the organism must first be exposed to a stimulus, then followed by many successive reactions. Then a particular gene is triggered. cool
I can't think of a single reason why transplantation of organs should be considered unethical. When a person dies, his body will just return to dust. So, instead of letting it go to waste, why not let somebody make use of its parts.
I think hypnosis works by opening your subconscious mind. I have read a book about the wonders of hypnosis. There are many forms of hypnosis. Some can help people ease their pain. Some can help them recall the things that they have forgotten. I think it helps in a person's creativity because it allows the person to be in touch with his personality in a deeper level. The traits of the person that is unknown to him will be revealed. The left part of the brain is called the "creative" part. It is also the one that works when you are in the subconscious state.
To play music in front of a new audience would make a person nervous. Self-hypnosis might work to help you feel relaxed. There are licensed practitioners who give tapes for self-hypnosis. The effectiveness would also vary depending on the willingness of the person.
This has been a topic of debate for ages. Until now, it hasn't been resolved. Clearly, scientists should have a side on this matter but should remain skeptical. If someone would establish the requirements to categorize something as living or nonliving, there would still be questions such as this.
elow! I'm new. I just want to try this forum because our teacher inspired us to do so. I'm into biology. but i think i'm born for math or techie. by the way i love anime. and play utopia
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.