quantumdream

You're kidding about the coriolis effect, aren't you? This isn't a sphere! Keep it simple, smartie.

aman, I think you have the general idea. Can any of you now do the physics to "derive the equation that describes the dynamics of the unfurling roll?"

A roll of supple paper of thickness x, wound tightly and initially of radius R>>x, has its free end attached so that when released it unwinds downward by gravity. Derive the equation that describes the dynamics of the unfurling roll, and determine its point of maximum velocity.

The parameters I gave define the observable universe, whose age and dimensions closely outline current hydrogen populated intergalactic space.

The parameters I gave define the observable universe, whose age, dimensions and temperature closely outline current hydrogen populated intergalactic space.

One more time, Brush up on your random walk!

I should have said "void of baryonic matter" (not to consider neutrinos, other WIMPs, or exotic particles). By classical, I mean non-virtual as well. The percentage of hydrogen decaying in intergalactic space is negligible for this problem.

Mine already is.

When was the last time that the Earth's atmophere (even a few atoms of it) decayed into energy? Proton (hydrogen ion) halflife is greater than 1000 times the age of the universe!

Some day, in order to stop hallucinating, you may have to take pharmaceuticals for life.

Yes, averaged over the given age and radius.

Radical, my guess is more on the scale of ~centimeter or ~meter.

In a statistically mechanical intergalactic space with (noninteracting) hydrogen atoms of average density 10^-5 atom/cm^3, with age 10^17 seconds, radius 10^28 cm, and temperature 3 K, what is the maximum radius void of matter to have existed given those spacetime parameters? That is, create a random walk model to describe the maximal absolute void volume that classical intergalactic spacetime has ever allowed.

We all have a different phase relative to the actual atoms, which does not affect their dual (me-atom) expectation value, but does that of the triadic path you-me-atom. Much like a dual slit experiment with communicating observers for slits, and a laboratory>>lambda source.

Motive - to show a correlation between physical phenomena and intuition ("eventual expectations") internal historically to observers (and manifest to a degree greater than that provided by the scientific method).

Conspiracy~"to breathe with." Quantum participation does just that. The world affects us as we affect the world. "Quantum thinking," as opposed to thinking with aloof classical reason, is in sync with environmental expectation. It answers in an unconventional manner, but one that intimates a more inclusive objectivity. Perhaps there is even a Higher Intelligence that influences our expectations with outcomes. Moreover, the scientific method is not always the most effective; rather than rigidly changing our expectations, "eventual expectations" may also interpolate toward a conclusion. Recall the unconventional methods of Ramanujan, removed from the scientific method, reproducing much of modern mathematics in a his mystical fashion, deriving problems and corollaries solely from solutions themselves.

Perhaps there are no great truths or theories, just a world that dispenses information consistant with our eventual expectations...

In a cow field, tall grass and mushrooms tend to grow where dung is distributed by the cattle, which list to one side due to herbaceous and mycological consumption. The scientific jargon referring to this phenomenon is "crap circles."

Does the summation of reciprocal prime pair products 1/(2*3)+1/(3*5)+1/(5*7)+1/(7*11)+1/(11*13)+1/(13*17)...=? or the summation of reciprocal Fibonacci pair products 1/(1*1)+1/(1*2)+1/(2*3)+1/(3*5)+1/(5*8)+1/(8*13)+1/(13*21)...=? have any significance in number theory?

Femi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein condensates are created respectively for those statistics by cooling fermionic atoms or helium to extremely low temperatures (less than 10^-6 degrees Kelvin). The phenomena observed, where atoms' radial displacement becomed less defined outwardly to the magnitude of approximately one centimeter(!), is a consequence of the cooling restricting their absolute momentum ~ (:delta: p) ~ (2mkT)^.5) ~ h/(:delta: r), according to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

Sonoluminescence (light from aqueous acoustic bubbles) seems to be the biggest bang for the buck for rapid mechanical energy conversion. But back to the topic. Apparently an ether-like effect measured in the experiment first referred to has been violating the symmetry of relativity. The correction term mentioned might not arise from a macroscopic ether, but a microscopic quantum gravity, a "compactified ether." First repeat the experiment using a spherically precise microwave cavity, noting any directional anomalies. Calculate whether :delta:t=n*R^2/r, where :delta:t is the quantum time correction for an orbit of radius r around a mass whose Schwartzchild radius is R. I obtain n~2.5 (i.e., near unity or equivalence) for this experiment. This equation is my approximation for quantum gravity. Please see my website's second article.

I'm in the same boat, so here it goes, by the seat of my pants: Branes involve extradimensional (parallel) dimensions. I'm thinking that at least one of those (spacetime) dimensions' resonances interferes less destructively (if at all) for gravity than for E-M waves (restricted to conventional spacetime). The brane extraspacetime may then be seen through gravity as traversing the cosmos, "short-circuiting" our accustomed four dimensions, as it were. We see light confined to our spacetime and travelling circuitously compared to gravity cutting across its E-M paths.

I'm not referring to conventional dimensions like those of ordinary spacetime. I'm speculating, using harmonics of compactified string or extra brane dimensions.

Four dimensional Pythagorean theorem, with a negative time term (here for simultaneous (s^2=0), lightlike events): s^2=0=x^2+y^2+z^2-(ct)^2 (ct)^2=x^2+y^2+z^2 (think of this representing a light ray with v=c).

Inflation is also accessible here and now in high energy, near Planck scale (10^-24 cm) physics. That may indeed allow superluminal travel. I'm not familiar with the aspect of Tesla you mentioned, but it may be possible for one to tunnel into these higher "harmonics" subatomically to achieve c+. Just adjust your phase around the frequency 10^35 1/sec (that of GUT).