admiral_ju00

Yes. There are too many to go through, and w/o hints at which journals I need to look through (as in Publishers) and to complicate it a bit further, no dates and times..........you can see where I have a problem. Hence, my idea to find an online db, that can be easily quarried across many journals published upto date.

Nice one, YT2095. I like option 2 the most in your responce.

I do, but so many sites offer variants of this message: "An online subscription or single article purchase is required to access this article" I'm still waiting on the reply from the Nature Publishing Group for a question(s) I sent them last week(Friday). I need that answered before I'll commit to their journal (which is a bit cheaper than many others).

http://news.com.com/2100-1040_3-5062464.html?tag=fd_top http://transmeta.com/efficeon/efficeon_tm8620.html http://transmeta.com/efficeon/faq.html I still say that Itanium is better or better yet in a league of it's own, here's some info on that. But that's a whole new level of power and money. http://intel.com/products/server/processors/server/itanium2/index.htm But if you want someone to do a detailed comparison between the P4, Athlon, Transmeta's cpu's designed for PC's, then it'll take more time than I have or want to dedicate to this. The above websites should tell you the advantages of their new cpu.

geez, you're impatient and pushy i suppose it can work, provided that it will run in the shell and not the mac os itself. don't have a max os X to try it out myself though. but yes, taking a source designed for a linux and recompiling it on unix, will not be a problem in most cases.

1) How in the hell did these guys reached Absolute Zero - when all the rest of the physicists are able to come very, very close but w/o actually reaching it completely. 2) Molecular vibration in absolute zore temp is absolute nonsence. By the way, thanks Tesseract for the summary of that bs.

mooey, which is precisely why I've added that little part to the end:

your english is not bad, and you've just answered my question about this time machine thing(after your current debate)

looks like quartz to me.

and when might that be?

there are a bit more than 6. color, transparency, hardness, streak luster cleavage fracture gravity(specific) crystal form are you trying to identify something based on it's physical appeareance or based on it's compound makeup/formulae?

The whole beauty of this is that It's in the eye of the Beholder (That'll be YOU). The only reason you think these pictures are looking right at or through you(whatever), is because (unconsciously) you want them to, by paying extra special attention to them(especially to their eyes). The same phenomenon can be applied to most other people, but it only starts to bug you(or anyone else) is when you more or less, let your imagination take the best of you. How to fix it, pay no attention to them. Don't think that they ARE looking at you, etc........

if i may take a wild guess at it: Jar Jar Binks?

............ ............. LOL LOL LOL ROFL

you mean on a mac which is running linux? yes, shouldn't be too much of a problem. if you're referring to mac os itself, then no.

yes, but the type of info(database) i'm looking for is found on that linky's 3rd & 4th paragraphs: the stuff in bold, in particular is what i'm looking for.....

Heh, George Carlin RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

the problem is (a lot) more widely spread out than that, i'm afraid.

i like this site: http://www.phact.org/e/dennis4.html

Nice! thx.

it's on my to do list that never gets enough time and or attention. :sad:

rofl. nice one.

i don't think i want to know what made you enter such a site

Well, I'm sorry, but unlike you, I do not engage, read, study and devote any of my time nor do I care, to Pseudoscience or other off-the wall crap.