admiral_ju00

There are only very few genes on the Y that actually code for anything.

I guess you've never heard of the term Co-Dominant (genes) either.

In males Only. Skye was talking about the female X chromosome in FEMALE. And stop using the blasted Caps, they don't make your point across any more easier or intelligent.

Mendelian disorder is a single gene disorder. Meaning it can happen on any allele and on any chromosome. However since you question everything I say, I found you a more official version of the above said: Courtesy of: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002048.htm

Have you ever heard of Mendelian disorder?

Are you saying that there aren't any genetic disorders that come from the X chromosome(Y chromosome is not in this equation obviously)?

Excuse me. I'm not thinking straight for the time being. Primarily because I have to divide my attention between my work and the forums. Obviously one is more important then the other. I should be able to provide you with a better answer once things settle down here a bit.

Like Skye said, this is the only chromosome in the female genome that has a few more 'extra' genes on it.

She is wrong. You are wrong.

I do believe that there were some studies into this and yes, it is spring. Also, most physicians advice against or at least warn that if the child is born during the winter, that there is a higher chance of experience some complications, either to the mother or the offspring.

Sex system in humans is part of their social system. Like Swansont said, it is due to our evolution as h. sapiens that our mating seasons are not as pronounced as it is in other species. Greater apes also show some very interesting sexual behavior, and as I've mentioned it here once(forgot what thread that was in), but Bonobo's are much like humans when it comes to sex. That reason alone makes then a bit more diverged then some of the other apes, however strange as it is, it(their sexual system) alone does not make then more closely related to us. Here are some more reads for those interested: Bonobo Apes Primate Males

Quite alright Heh, why would that angrify me? I have no problems with Sociology and Sociologists, after all, some of the things we study do cross-over.

Interesting. Thanks Martin.

They do regenerate, spawn new connections, etc.

That is the title of this paper. What do you guys in particular Martin and Jana think about this? http://xxx.arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0407/0407476.pdf

Something that I found very interesting and though of sharing it here: http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science/07/29/peru.brewery.reut/index.html

An interesting article that I thought is relevant here: http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science/07/29/science.courtship.reut/index.html

Holy schnikes, that's a long read. Don't have time to read it all, but I do not agree with this statement offhand: There have been at least several Anthropological(by the way, Archaeologists are Anthropologists) studies that say at least a certain portion of Indians are certainly Aryans, as well as the roots of their linguistics. Stuff like that.

I thought that the MIB and MIBII were pretty cool. 'Old-busted hottness' On a second thought, I guess if Tommy Lee Jones wasn't in it, it would have been more on par with Will Smith's other movies.

Not really. Philosophy is still an important part in many of the things that we do. Some of the things that Aristotle philosophized are still under heavy debate. Basically, you might want to read up on Aristotelian philosophy to get an idea of what it is and how to think and write philosophically. I myself can't bear reading his stuff. It angrifyes me for some reason.

Interesting. My uni does not check the ID if you're using the bookstore on it's campus. Others, yes.

bender cartman gir hitler homer jesus zim zoidberg ermy Cheers I forgot to add the linky in that 1st responce(it has been fixed) Sry