AutomagSam

What I love and people Like Michael Chrichton have pointed out, is the fact that before this great global warming fad, we all acknoledged that Climate cannot be predicted we cannot predict whether patterns, yet some people are asking us to invest millions upon millions on weather patterns 100 years from now? Does it make sense, I think not.

Um they never impregnated a frog if you actually watch the movie. The used some african frog to fill in the genetic gaps, thus thats why the dinosaur was able to change sex in order to breed due to the use of the frog genes.

Who would want to see a docile Velociraptor lol.

Not saying I agree with this, but since I am young and want to educate myself, in detail how would one going about doing what you are suggesting. And spare no details plz.

Oh I didnt mean to offend you tho, I was just pointing it out to the mods, that he deleted mine, which were on the same level, but he didn't get rid of the rest even tho it was claimed he cleared the thread. I understand your post, Infact I totally agree with it. I just think there is lack of freedom of speach if we speak out against how imoral this is and get silenced. It was in no means a personal attack gutz, infact I think your and snoopay700's post should be left there. .....seriously

I know this question sounds lame, but theoretically speaking, is it possible for dinosaurs to be created using the process in the movie.

Yeah ur right in that aspect but the whole idea of this is wierd. But Cap'N is right, so lets ignore the trolling part of this thread. Scientifically I think there is nothing to gain from this whole thing. Splicing oru genes with animals acomplishes what exactly? Scientists are so concerned with whether they can do these things, they tend to not stop and think what would happend when they do do it.

There is nothing to discuss that is the issue. What is the legal thing tho? And u still haven't answered about the gutz comment calling them basterds.

Yes but there it was a legit question not pushing beastiality, and the person who posted it had experience on the forum, as well as good intentions. Your thread was legit.

Thank you. What was the legal thing tho im just curious, tho Im glad u cleared it. And what about gutz, he calls them : As well as Snoopay700 saying he should burn in hell if the guy goes through with this. I mean if ur going to get rid of mine u have to get rid of the rest.

I also strongly agree there should be a general experiment board, as it is not fair to the rest.

Yes that and we have to look at improving such things as our immune system. We can help to reduce issues that our future generations will have, if we can improve the genes. By studying the genetic code, one can grasp basicly the blue prints to create stonger, better built people. AND create dinosaurs on an island...........

It is a good one, I had been considering it for a while in my plans.

Yeah thanks for ur input and all, but I know the limit of our guns, as the RT can cycle up to 34bps, and my mag 19, tho odviously no one can shoot that fast, but anyways we both have battery loaders, we are just designing to be inovative here not cause we need to lol . So its not a question of what our gun can handle. Oh and do you use pbnation or Automags.org, if so what is ur handle?

...then I realised that I was still in 1964 and there were no aliens,I was wasted talking to my cats and....

...he told me of what was to come, the neurons in people's heads had driven them to bad jokes rather than scientific thinking or...

It is to my belief, and beliefs change given time(no pun intended), that it would be impossible to go back into the past and "kill your father". Let me explain why I think this. Say Fred goes back wanting to kill is father. Only one thing stops him from doing this, the fact that his father exists in Fred's present. In order to kill some one in the past, It is to my belief that it would have already have happened in the past, thus Fred would not exist, making it impossible to "kill his father". Now giving this explanation we find ourselves with several issues to look at in the means of time travel. The first, it is impossible to change the past, without there being a seperate time line, which in my mind a seperate time line cannot exist. Second, I would love to think I could travel to the past, but right now, I'm not all that certain it is possible, though I don't deny it, to me it is almost certain you can travel to the future, as it has yet to happen, but the past has already occured making it impossible to do without yet again, a seperate timeline. I DO NOT however think that it is impossible to travel into the past, but am merely speculating all the possabilities until I know the answer. Ahh Time Travel is my favorite thing to talk about

First, I must point out that this is an impossible question to answer. No one here will be able to prepare any insite on the out come of an "alien invasion". It is ludicrous, to even speculate what we would do. Now let me explain why I said the above. In order to "predict" how we would handle an alien invasion, we would need to have information concerning the "aliens". At this point in time, we do not even know that aliens exist. Not one shread of evidence, can be brought in here and state "hey aliens really do exist.", and I say that with a very open view, as I'm not against the notion of aliens existing, but rather the fact that some say based on the data, they most likely do. Anyways to make a long explanation short, it is simply impossible to say how we would do for we know nothing about aliens, or even whether they exist, so how can we predict what we don't know. This is why we must steer clear of predictions, as they just invite entertainment rather then science backed data and knowledge.

...save big money on your car insurance...

We must however grasp that this is a theory. The description you gave of his theory, also lacks a detailed description, time has time? So let me get this straight time has itself? I could be missing something, but it is to my firm belief this is wrong, as to my belief time has dimension, for we move throught time all the time, though we may not realise it. You must take into consideration, that whatever we do in "time" changes things in the future, so we are doing something in this space that we are moving through. I understand where Lajtner is going with this, but it is to my beliefe, emphasize my belief, that this theory is false as to me time most definetly has dimension.

...it was one of the eloi, who had remembered when I...

..I there went all the way back to 1964 where I..

headed for my machine, I knew only the past was willing to except me now, and there I would travel to...

Hey thanks, lol you really know alot about this stuff, yeah I own a 68 classic, my friend owns an RT, but I'll seriously consider what your said.

Do black holes have mass? (excuse me if that is a stupid question.)