divinum1

Like I said, it is only single electrons that establish a cooperation between themselves, on one to one bases, and at 90 degrees. All of which is in agreement with currently accepted rules. However, I do not have any evidence for it. But if you look at electron configuration in atom's shells, you should easily deduce how many single electrons each atom has, and thus how many bonds it can have. Although the present electron configuration does not specify single electrons anywhere, which a great disservice to chemistry, and science as a whole.

But they all form molecules, with the exception of noble gases, who do not have any single electrons at all.

Same rotation acts repulsive, because whenever they approach one another, their actions are opposite in direction, and as a result, they repel. On the other hand if two such electrons are forced together, as they may be in some experiments, then they annihilate themselves. And in this case they are perceived as electron and anti-electron. What this clearly means is that there is no such a thing as anti matter. But due to their own distraction they are perceived as such. Although naturally electrons do not act as such. The opposite direction of rotation acts attractive, and when two such electrons approach one another, they align themselves at 90 degrees, and their charges cancel out, and this is how they establish a full cooperation with one another. And this how molecules are formed when two or more atoms are brought together. And only single electrons comply to these conditions, because a single electron has only one direction of motion (rotational motion that is), and as such, it only represents one half of a complete reality. And for this reason, only atoms with single electrons, or being deficient in them, are mostly in their outermost shell, are the ones that combine in formation of molecules.

An electron is an integral unit of gravitons, and any such unit by itself acts as 1/2 of a complete reality, because due to its rotation it creates an in-equilibrium in space, which expresses itself as a charge. For this reason, only single electrons exhibit such charge, which in essence is electron's desire to establish a cooperation with another electron. Oxygen atom for example, has 3 paired electrons, and 2 single one, and only these 2 single electrons are seeking to establish a complete equilibrium. And they do so for example when 2 Hydrogen atoms come in contact with it, since Hydrogen atoms also have a single electron, which also seeks to become complete. And so in the process they form H2O molecule. What this clearly means, is that electrons do not repel when their equilibrium is established. But they do repel if and whenever they are approached from a wrong direction, which does not allow them to establish a cooperation. For two electrons to establish a full equilibrium between themselves, they have to be at 90 degrees, and they thus cancel their charges out, and as such, are neutral. The repulsive force between electrons is a natural state because all electrons are naturally bound to one direction of motion (rotational motion that is). Therefore, same direction of rotational motion acts repulsive. So why do they not simply switch over an establish a full cooperation between themselves? the reason is, because their own rotation is not oriented on their own will, but rather on the force that exist on the outside of electrons. And it is this outside force that causes all free electrons to act as repulsive.

A photon if is a single one, it is the smallest amount of energy that can individually exist (a quantum). A graviton is composed of two such photons or quanta. An electron is composed of a multitude of gravitons. A dielectron is composed of two electrons, and whenever they are confined to the second level, they are known as paired electrons. But when they are bound to the third level (nuclear level that is) the same dielectrons exist in a contracted Space (in radius that is), and are therefore much smaller in volume, and as such are known as "gamma particles". These gamma particles are the main constituents of protons and neutrons. However, these gamma particles also exist in cooperation with one another, hence they exist in pairs, just as all other particles and sub-particles do. Thus, a pair of two gamma particles constitutes one Up quark, and two Up quarks bound together represent one Down quark. And these quarks-Up quarks that is are bound into groups of sixteen. And there are seven nuclear levels that these quarks fulfill, and each level is subdivided into a specific number of regions; the total number of these regions equals 59. And only the last level (the seventh that is) is incomplete in Numbers, but complete in Space (in volume), and in Light (in motion). In fact, this is the point in time when and where the motion of all sub-particles comes to a stop-motionless. And for this reason, a neutron exhibits no charge, which clearly means that the internal motion of a particle exhibits the charge. For this reason, when two electrons establish a full cooperation with one another, their charges cancel out, and as a result, a paired unit of two electrons becomes neutral. And this apply to gamma particles, since they are composed of two electron which are in a contracted form. And when such a gamma particle comes out of a nucleus, either from a proton or neutron, they expand to their proper level which is the second level. And in the process of their expansion, they separate into two individual particles, where one becomes negative in form, while the other becomes positive in form, hence one is viewed as electron, and the other as positron. Therefore, they were not created in the process, they existed as such, but in cooperation with one another they do not exhibit their charge-like characteristics, only after their separation they do so. Thus, a neutron or a proton is assembled by 920-924 dielectrons or gamma particles, all of which exist in groups of 16, with the exception of the last level-the seventh, which is composed of four groups of 5 gamma particles each. Therefore, by smashing a proton or a neutron, they may brake into any number of these constituents, either in groups or individuals, and by observing these sub-particles in experiments, like the one conducted in CERN, it only leads into bigger and bigger confusion. And not only that, but the same comply to electrons as well, neither are they made of a single constituent.

Hi Dovada! May I give you just a good hint as where the center of the universe is; Since every system has its central point, so does the universe. To determine where that center is, (me and you can not) but the scientists who are using Hubble telescope should have no problem, simply by taking the measurement from our point of reference, in all three dimensions, adding up all six coordinates, and then dividing them by six, that would give an approximate center of the universe. Whether that center is one single star or galaxy, or a group of galaxies has yet to be determined. But the universe as a system in itself must have a central point, just like a galaxy has, or even a smaller system like our own Solar system. According to my calculation the universe has a radius from; 6.75x1026 m, to 1.35x1027 m. The reason I put two radii is because the universe is expanding and contracting between these two radii. However, the center of the universe is least important in finding the reason as why our own solar system is bound to a constant motion, which is circular in form, with some minor exceptions. Therefore, to determine any of these facts, one does not have to concentrate to the center of the universe, but rather to the system in question. And if such fact can be determined mathematically, this means that the solution to all motions has been discovered. And I firmly believe that I have done that, but nobody seems to pay any attention. They simply see all things the old fashion way, and always asking prove this prove that. Now if mathematics does not prove anything, then science shouldn't be called science, as far as I am concerned. Nevertheless, when you look at the orbital motions of the planets in our solar system, you can clearly predetermine that the force of these motions is dictated by the Sun. And nothing can be in constant motion unless a constant force is acting upon them. Similarly, nothing would be standing still-being motionless unless a constant force is acting upon it as well. It is so obvious, why then thinking and believing that a body in a constant state of motion, will continue to do so for ever without any force acting upon it. For this reason, I firmly believe that there are two forces of gravity, and each one acts independent of the other, and they are directly proportional to one another, and the radius or the mass from which they derive. And since the speed of light (c/s), and G (u-g-constant) are limited factors, hence all things in the universe and within it are limited in accordance of such. Therefore, masses, their radii, and their forces (Fo&Fc), are also limited in accordance of such. None of them can extend beyond these limitations. All of which can be mathematically verified. And because of these limitations the universe became divided into 3.67x1013 individual systems, so called galaxies, many of which broke into smaller groups. Hence each galaxy was established by the same amount of mass; 4.955x1040 kg. approx. Where in the beginning all that mass existed as one single star, whose radius was; 3.67x1013 m. At that point the Fo (orbital force) was equal to; c/s, while its Fc (centripetal force) was only 2,449 m/s/s. And as the Fo imposed its action upon that mass from the very beginning of its formation, the mass became bound to a rotation, whose rotational velocity produced higher kinetic energy than the Fc did holding the mass together. And as a result, the mass broke apart into billions of smaller pieces. And this is how all galaxies came into being. Now if anyone wants me to prove this, then they should examine their own intelligence first. The universe is limited both inward, and outward, what this means is that whatever apply to the outer dimensions, the exact opposite apply to the inner dimensions. Therefore the universe is limited in the smallest, as well as in the biggest, therefore the universe does not expand to infinity, nor does it contract to infinity. The limitations of the universe were predetermined as the light speed was determined, and the light speed was predetermined as the space was determined. And now these three quantities are directly proportional to one another at all the times. Is there anyone that can prove that this is not so?

Hi Dovada I notice that you are interested in cosmic motions, which are not adequately explained thus far. For it is obvious that for anything to be bound to a motion that there must be a force that causes that motion. You already know that I introduced gravitation as two force system, all of which is mathematically proven that there are two forces of gravity, but all that is useless. Hence, how can you prove anything? even if you do come up with an equation, it will be discarded. For the truth is the hardest thing to swallow, because it destroys the lie, and you know where that leads. I do not know who is behind all this, but all these topics are just trowing the ball back and forth without any aim. So do you think that we should continue to be ridiculed.

Hi Anilkumar: Let me try to explain in layman terms as why space around a mass is curved. It is gravitational field that establishes this so called curvature around a mass. And the reason is because gravitational field is composed of two forces. Which coexist and cooperate at 180 degrees relative to one another. And these two forces divided the space equally between themselves, while at the same time they have to remain perpendicular to one another at all the times. And as a result, at both polar ends they become subtracted, and this subtraction results in the curvature of space at both poles. Which makes the curvature of the field something similar to magnetic field lines.

Any orbiting body is subject to the orbital force of the body around which it orbits. Orbit of the Moon for example is bound to Earth orbital force whose magnitude is directly proportional to the mass of the earth, G, and the distance between the two bodies, as follow; v = (mG)/d (square rooted) , Where v matches the velocity of the orbital force at that particular distance. And the velocity of the force is = m/s. (not meters/second/second, as centripetal force is) Furthermore orbital force is circular in form due to the division of space between the two forces. And for this reason, all orbital motions are circular. Hence orbital force, centripetal force, and the distance between them are always proportional to one another. Fo= Fcxd (square rooted), Fc= Fo2/d, and d=Fo2/Fc ,

No, gravity as a whole is composed of two forces, each of which acts independent of the other. Centripetal force is only one half of gravity, and this force acts centripetal-directly toward the center of the mass. And it has nothing to do with orbiting bodies for as long as an orbiting body is bound to the orbital force, which acts circular due to the division of space between the two forces. The notion that gravity is just one force, is misleading everyone and everything from any further progress in astronomy and physics. Centripetal force is the one that hold the mass together, and any object that does not comply to orbital force is then overtaken by centripetal force, and it thus comes falling down to earth. While orbital force is forcing the mass/object to stay synchronized with it. Hence Newton's law of universal gravitation does not apply as stated. Even the very first Newton's law; An object continues in a state of rest or in a state of motion at a constant speed along a straight line, is incorrect. Because an object that is at rest, is already subject to a force, and that is the reason for being at rest. And the same apply to an object that is in motion, for it is in motion because a force is already acting upon it. I hope you can understand what I am trying to prove.

!. Gravitation is a natural two force system; one is orbital force, and the other is centripetal force. 2. Each force has its own action and direction in space: Centripetal force, or the g force is the one whose all actions are directed toward the center of the mass. Whereas orbital force is the one whose all actions and directions are circular in form and parallel to the equator of the mass, (earth orbital force for example acts from west to east). 3. Orbital force is not centrifugal in nature, its action however does display some centrifugal effects, but the force itself acts circular. 4. Actually gravity is part of orbital force, which represents one half of gravity, while the other half belongs to the centripetal force. Since orbital force is all unified in its direction and action, it is therefore hundreds and even thousands of times more powerful than centripetal force which is divisional in character. Hence the orbital force is the prime mover of the universe, and for this reason, all heavenly bodies are moving-orbiting in accordance of the force being imposed upon them. And it is always that one primary body (like Sun) that imposes its force on all bodies within its system, and they all obey to it: which is; Fo=Gm/d (square rooted), Fo=orbital velocity:

First there was God, who is the originator, the "Father" of "All". And the first thing he did, he divided his own Godhead into a multitude of smaller divinities which are now known as the Sons (pl), since they are descendant of God the father. And the sons were preordained to (light) cooperate with one another, on one to one bases. And this is how they transformed into a holiness, and are thus called the Holy Spirits. And this is how the Holy Spirits became divided into two equal halves. And through their act of cooperation (light), they established an order in space, which became divided into two equal halves as well, and as such was called the firmament of heaven. And that was just the beginning of the metaphysical reality, which many billions of years thereafter transformed into the physical world of matter that we now live in.

Yes; The Trinity itself was actually the first that became divided into two equal halves. Hence it is the Trinity who is the main part of everything there is. Because first it was the Father who became divided into the Sons (pl), who themselves established a cooperation with one another, and they thus trams-formed into a holiness, which as such it became the first reality coexistent of two equal halves. And from then on, the entire world is divided into two equal halves.

It seems that science is being divided against itself, with too many theories and hypotheses, none of which agree with one another. After all most of them are just speculation, but scientists think that they are right. Consequently they do not see the truth even when it is represented to them. They simply ignor it, because it is contradictory to their way of thinking. But someone somewhere will perceive the truth, and the truth will make the world free from the dark teachings that we are forced to accept as such.

I believe that science and every scientist for that matter, with every new discovery they are one step closer to God, even though they do not realize that. I was the same way for over 35 years while studying physics. And then one day in 1985 I wrote something relating to atoms and particles of matter. When I finished my writing, I didn't pay much attention what I wrote until a few day later, when I red my own writing. I became fully aware that my writing was pertained an explanation of how everything in the universe works. And I called them the "True principles of Nature", which I am using ever since. And therewith I discover virtually everything about the universe. All of which leads directly to God.

A charge of a particle must be its rotational motion-spin or torque. Since it produces no frequency or wavelength, but just a charge which constant. This means that its rotational motion-spin or torque is also constant. Therefore the charge of a particle is its rotational kinetic energy;

To prove that gravitational fields are limited, I would have to go 331,000 km. above the earth, and in that area the two gravitational fields of the earth and the moon are separated. And if I could place an apple at that distance, we would find out which way the apple would fall. And that I can not do. Although earth g-field extends up to 685,450 km. away from the earth. Both g-fields are spherical in form, with some exception on their polar ends. And just as the moon's g-field being surrounded by earth's g-field, so are they both surrounded by Sun's g-field. And that apply to every planet in the solar system. Hence what we observe as planets orbiting about the Sun, they are in fact carried around the Sun by its own g-field who is not stationary. It rotates differentially ( by a square root of the distance). To say that planets are orbiting around the sun, is just a simple explanation as the way we see it, but in reality it is completely different. For example Jupiter's g-field extends to; 39,920,000 km. And all Jupiter's moons-satellites are orbiting around Jupiter in precise accordance of Jupiter's own orbital force (Fo) ; m x G/d (square rooted).

The Moon and all man made satellites are a testament to that. They all orbit around the earth in accordance of earth's orbital force (Fo), which is exactly the same in velocity as is the orbital speed of these bodies. Hence, they are moving-orbiting around the earth in accordance of orbital force (Fo) of the earth. Where their velocities are: Ov = m x G/d (square rooted).

By definition, an object in motion is subject to a force already, and if you intend to make it move from that state you have to use a force. But gravitational forces are not subject to such condition. They simply perform their natural act as they suppose to. For the two gravitational forces exist in full cooperation with one another. Where one force is using the other force as a base upon which it acts, and vice versa. But in due process of their division, one force (the Fo that is) becomes much stronger because it becomes unified, whereas the other force (Fc that is). is the one that becomes all divided. And as a result, these two forces are not equal in strength. The Fo (orbital force) is therefore hundredth and even thousandth of times more powerful than its counterpart (Fc).

Newton's first second and third law of motion are correct. However Newton's law of universal gravitation is incorrect and incomplete. Newton's first law does relate to gravitation (in fact to both forces; Fo, and Fc, even though Newton was unaware at that time that there were two forces of gravity), which clearly states; that an object continues in a state of rest, or in a state of motion. But it does not specify as why they do so. For they do so because they are both being bound to a force. The object that is at rest is held to a mass due to Fc (g) acting on it constantly. And so is the object that is bound to a constant state of motion (orbital motion that is), which is constantly acting upon it by Fo (orbital force). Furthermore all motions in outer space are circular due to space being divided between the two forces. For this reason, all heavenly bodies are orbiting in a circular motion, and are bound to constant speed, with the exception when they move further away. And all gravitational fields are limited in accordance of their masses and the distances separating them. Therefore the law of universal gravitation has to be rewritten, and re-defined. (I am still working on it.) Newton's very first law clearly states, that for any mass to be either at a constant rest, or at a constant state of motion, there must be a force that compels them to do so. And that apply to the rotation of the Earth as well.

If gravity had an infinite range there would be no order in the universe, just a chaos as it was before the universe was. And how can you prove that gravity has an infinite range? please answer me that.

Your first statement, that an object feeling no force will have constant velocity, and that an object feeling a force will change its velocity, now this is absolutely wrong. Because no object anywhere in the universe can have a constant velocity without a force acting upon it. And an object being bound to a force does not have to change its velocity. The only time such object will chance its velocity if the force is faster than its velocity. For there are objects in space whose velocities are exactly the same, as the velocity of the force at that particular point. Geostationary satellites are a perfect example of that, for they are not bound to earth's centripetal force, but rather to the orbital force of the earth. Since both earth's gravitational forces are directly proportional to the earth's mass and its radius. However the orbital force (Fo) attenuates by a square root of its distance. Whereas the centripetal force (g) Fc attenuates by an inverse square of its distance. Hence they are not equal in strength. Earth's: Fo = mxG/d (square rooted) , While earth's: Fc = mG/d2 Therefore Geostationary satellites are 100% synchronized with earth Fo, for this reason they stay in a constant place. And the same is true about the orbital speed of the Moon. In other words they are all getting a free ride, but they have to be synchronized with the force. And when an object is bound to one force regardless of which one it is, that is the force that the object stay with. And here on the surface of the earth, everything is bound to the Fc (g), and for this reason, every object is stack to it because it is held by a force of 9.8 m/s2 constantly. While the Fo is taking care of earth spin-rotation, and the orbiting objects.

To answer to your question about orbiting bodies, yes they do orbit faster when closer to the gravitational mass, and slower when further away. The reason for this is; because the Fo (orbital force) decreases by a square root of its distance. Whereas the Fc (centripetal force) decreases by an inverse square of its distance, which is a big difference. For example Moon's orbital velocity is directly bound to the Earth's orbital force; as follow; Ov= mxG/d (square rooted). which = 1019 m/s. Whereas Earth's Fc, at a distance of the Moon is; Fc (g) = mxG/d2 which = 2.7x10-3 m/s2 The orbital speed of the Moon being bound to the orbital force of the Earth is because Eaerth's gravitational field encompasses all around Moon's gravitational files, which extends to 52,000 km. while Earth's gravitational field extends to 685,400 km. Therefore the Moon along with its gravitaional field is like a small bobble within a bigger bobble, although they are not exactly baloon like. All gravitational fields of all masses are limited, they do not extend to infinity. Even Sun's gravitational field extend to approx. 6.5x1014 m. away from the Sun, where Sun's own field is encompassed by galactic gravitational field. And the same apply to galaxies themselves, for they are divided and surrounded by universe's gravitational field which extend far beyond the edge of the galaxies that are observable. I hope this will give you a broader insight of how gravitation works, although there are many more mysteries about gravitation, which I might explain in some other topic.

Any object that has a velocity and a direction is subject to a force, and if the force is constant so is its velocity, and so is the force that causes this velocity. And if an object is present anywhere in space, it is subject to two internal forces of its own, Fo and Fc. And every such mass exists in cooperation with another mass which predominates over the smaller mass. None of this would take place if these masses had no gravitational field around them. Hence gravitational force is only directly proportional to the mass around which it is established. And it is this force (two of them Fo and Fc) that have the dominance over the mass, and it is the mass that has to obey to the force imposed upon it, not the other way around. Therefore Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation is also incorrect, because masses do not attract, it is the force of gravity that contracts the masses toward one another. And they only become contracted up to the point where the equilibrium of the three quantities become fully established, so that none of the quantities overlaps or under-laps. For if they do so, that becomes expressed as an attraction or as a repulsion. Hence gravitation is completely misunderstood. Scientific theories hypotheses and definitions are more abstractive than constructive, for they do not explain any reality as it actually is. If the science-scientists knew everything about the universe, then the science would no longer be science, it would become religion. Maybe this is the reason why religion became a religion, so that we do not have to wast our time about it for the second time.