Amr Morsi

Philosophically: If they will return to life after death, then there is nothing called spirits [concept of spirits doesn't permit their return to the body], and there were no real death from the origin. So, no fear, they just returned metabolically. Otherwise, there will be no return, because it is spiritual. So, no spirit-return. Can it be genies-like interaction? Wow? Don't fear man. Just go forward and kill the thought. Kill it.

I think that self-control is the main factor that guides the effectiveness of identity in one's response to others, i.e. it is the door. I do also know that identity-influence in response depends upon the situation/stimulus. Sudden, tensioned, .......... If 'identity' means 'self' than I can confidently reply, response is an identity of a self/spirit. But, if it means 'identification/extinction' then it is totally different it amplifies factors and suppresses others, and is excluded form the first statement, although not totally. I, my self, like to be as normal as possible, after applying ethics, and not to lead/show, unless it is an apparent right and/or a great need [to the situation, not to me]. Regards.

I wonder, microbes are very weak organisms, and every microbe can be affected, if not disintegrated, by thousands of chemicals [different types of attack], so, why till now there are many incurable infectious diseases?

In the Fourth World, all got dead. No one is leaving there now. What is the percentage factor Loka? And, why it is far from '1'? Is it body and sanity {easily infected and unresisted}? Or, environment and medical care? I am totally unspecialized. But, I can understand the word, or statement; "Ask a trier and ask a physician". And ..... I am neither a physician nor a trier [although I tried to be a physicist or a mathematician, but I have come out to be an engineer]. I am a virus ...... close your computers. Kidding ..... I just wanted to contribute. Thanks.

From a personal point of view, if there are hormones (or especially if other chemicals) that stimulate muscles, then it is better for us not to know them. Could it be nerves? By the way, I didn't hear before that hormones have been isolated or even having its compound analyzed. Is this true? I can add a thing, as I was athletic (I mean sportive), force enlarge muscles and effort on muscles strengthen it. My brother who is an Orthopedics Lecturer, said this is in agreement with many medical facts. But, I want to grow up bones! Calcium?! [Enlarge or renforce! ].

The following may be true: "If Higgs has color charge, then it will consequently have electric charge and will be used to unify (and most probably: alone) the Standard Model". But, a question: "Does the symmetry ALWAYS get broken in Electro-Weak Interaction?".

Perfect. States/modes in dimensions of space. Then, you would have mixed states/modes. But, away from field-concept and motion-concept, definitely there must be 2 additional properties that link extra 2 dimensions, as far as I can understand. A great trial of understanding the whole work in the scientific medium. Will quantum mechanics support GR or the opposite? And, does 'support' mean 'be a feature of' or 'be the origin of' or 'be adaptive with'?

A question: Do Higgs bosons mediate interactions in Color (strong) Force, taking into account that Leptons don't experience this type of force? But, I am sure of something, which is: As long as Color Charge has its own unique type away from the Electric Charge, then Higgs Bosons can't be involved in the strong force, unless leptons can be proven to consist of certain quark-composition that makes its interaction in Color Force is null, or do have small color charge, because at that instance the Higgs boson will have a color charge, no doubt. And, since this suppose is BELIEVED to be wrong, then Higgs Boson can't contribute in Strong Force. A philosophical discussion. A good point: mediators are mostly believed to interact, themselves, by the force they mediate, I don't know how. So, do Higgs bosons are believed to interact with any force, especially the weak force (and so they do have an electric charge and interacting with electromagnetic force {Electro-Weak})? Do Higgs Boson have Electric Charge? Note that they breaks the symmetry in/of a charge medium.

Points pointed to in the thread: 1. Higgs: matter, a special mediator, both or something else / neither ....... or something else. 2. Has it checked experimentally that electrons and positrons annihilate to pure energy? 3. Are they real or virtual? AND, if real, has it been discovered experimentally or not? A good question, perhaps it was in ajb's head, or a similar If real, why not be considered as a particle? Thanks to add any.

When a documented thing is poorly mentioned, then mostly it is top critical.

And so, I am not wise at all. I admit.

Thanks for your advice, Sir.

Don't feel so. I do mean every word I say. Thanks for your advice.

Waves and spreads of electromagnetic field begins from every point of the wire inside the shielding. Some reflects back and other penetrate it to the air. All being governed and described by Maxwell's Equations and by other field theories fro more exactness.

Add quantum and material's presence and properties ..... and begin to derive the whole issue from the beginning ..... can you do it? By the way, I can remember that there are 2 Joule's Laws: one for heat and the other for gases (if not one a feature to the second or 2 faces to the same coin).

Isn't friction for example, limits the max velocity, and hence affects the power?

It is either this either air-layers. But, viscosity is known to contain higher orders of velocity, rather than linear and square. Are there 2 reasons for viscosity? To solids and to layers of fluids. Or this is for liquids and this for gases?

What discriminates animals from eating plants rather than eating meat? I mean what determines this nature, is digestion and trial? is it tendency and like?

What was the reason of the "plenty"? Was it because he played "a big role" or was it "other factor"? It is the judge. If the organ can reform "theoretically" then there is no barrier to find a "Recover".

The edge: 1. Can't remove them immediately (if you have the tool) 2. Can't make surrounding ones divide/the organ to reform 3. They multiplicate if slope of removal is small 4. They must totally get removed to end the tumor 5. Reason for the disease must be removed Why not to maximize the growth of undiseased cells/tissues and to kill the diseased ones on the same rate (provided that they will not reproduce at a certain intermediate interval)? I think I must go to fix wheels better. Come with me!!!!!

Are there other rodents that don't belong to Rodentia?

Then, like metals (mostly), get attracted to any magnet. That's how they infect living organisms and manipulate nutrition? If this was the nature, isn't it better for us to learn MICROBONGFU? This means that they are growing in certain environment exponentially!