Phi for All

No, that wouldn't be reasonable. From a quick search around the internet, the sources for astrology all claim opposing things. It seems to be very much like religion, where the practitioners pick and choose what they want to believe. Not a science or even a practical methodology. I'm not interested in opinion or guesswork. This is a science discussion forum, and you don't seem to be able to support the assertions you're making. There's nothing testable here, nothing you can make solid predictions about. It seems worthless. Can you explain the value you see in it?

I asked if you have any evidence to support your ideas. This would be a great time to give us the details of your research into why Neptune and Uranus "don't affect human life significantly". Even if we use astrology as a basis (certainly NOT a science), other practitioners claim that Neptune absolutely affects human life, and is responsible for dreams and intuition. Uranus is associated with rebellion and (drum roll) humanitarianism. Can you assure me your methods aren't just cherry-picking results you want to see?

Is this some kind of AI-generated output where you're being encouraged for such creative thought? If we ask you anything, are you just running it through ChatGPT? You use too many unscientific concepts in your descriptions. Nobody is looking for "proof" since evidence is what the methodology is gathering. "Reality" is another big red flag, since you have no scientific definition of it. You introduce this "Gaiven" as the backbone of your concept but don't bother to explain. Basically, a ToE would need detail you lack. Your framework is so loose you probably think it explains everything, but only to you. The rest of us require evidence. This seems akin to using astrology to explain away difficult problems.

There seems to be a lot of evidence that refutes much of what you wrote. Do you have any evidence to support your speculation?

ahmet has been banned for letting prejudice and ignorance overcome their desire to learn, weak as it was.

Mr MAGA, Who knew Iran would be tougher to beat up than a 13-year old girl?

I'm very glad you were able to abstain from posting about it then. Although I found your "waste of time" joke VERY funny, you rascal.

If they can alleviate some gastric distress, it's easy to see this becoming a standard test at the primary care level, with a healthy range we're supposed to stay within. It does make me grin to think about people who test low, and are told they have to take/eat something to make them fart more. Their whole lives they've probably been secretly proud they aren't the crude heathens everyone else is.

I've learned to read my audience when talking political policy. There's a point where their eyes literally unfocus when they realize my answers aren't quick and pithy enough for them to remember, much less influence them. You can see them give up on understanding as they start cobbling up a response that involves Biden or Obama.

Moderator NoteAnd on that sour note, the thread is closed. NOT the way discussion should work, imo.

Perhaps it's the way we use representative democracy that causes the problem of advancing age within it. If our elected officials were more like a committee instead of individuals, we'd benefit from older, wiser heads while still having input from younger representatives with a more vested interest in progressive change. So many of our processes are rooted in misogyny and Christian hierarchies that glorify the individual rather than the group. We keep asking for a great leader instead of demanding fair representation of all our views. I also think capitalist strategies favor conservatism, but only after a company has a good model in place and therefore doesn't want the applecart upset. Then they start looking for older politicians to support, with the idea of keeping things just the way they are. Perhaps a more socialist strategy could enjoy the benefits of "git wisdom" without simply putting us all out to pasture?

If people bothered to fact check the details these programs produce, it might be a fair way to study since you still need a basic understanding of the material and you're actively reasoning through it, hopefully figuring out why the facts are relevant or not. Unfortunately, I see too many just assume the AI is completely accurate and just saved them a bunch of reading and studying, drawing conclusions only a brilliant computer mind could do so quickly.

I completely disagree with you about this, and it's tragic that so many seem to forgive the behavior because it didn't involve kidnapping? I think more harm is done when people ignore the women who have come forward with testimony showing Epstein was indeed a "real pedophile". Ignoring all those women shows an overall misogynistic bias, which has always tainted everything men try to accomplish, especially in science. The male perspective is forced on us at every turn, and I think the negative impacts are showing up in the revelation of the files. That Pam Bondi is Trump's Ghislaine Maxwell?

I particularly dislike the perspective that these children knew what they were getting into and were simply greedy. This is also part of the cult methodology, to diminish and blame the victim.

Consent laws protect children in these instances, or are supposed to, unless the men are shielded by other men who see nothing wrong with having sex with children.