Phi for All

! Moderator Note AI-generated content must be clearly marked. Failing to do so will be considered to be plagiarism and posting in bad faith. In other words, you can’t use a chatbot to generate content that we expect a human to have made. Since LLMs do not generally check for veracity, AI content can only be discussed in Speculations. It can’t be used to support an argument in discussions. Owing to the propensity for AI to fabricate citations, we strongly encourage links to citations be included as a best practice. Mods and experts might demand these if there are questions about their legitimacy. A fabricated citation is bad-faith posting. Posters are responsible for any rules violations from posting AI-generated content.

! Moderator Note "Listen to what I'm saying to you and piece it together yourselves" is NOT science. Stop posting like this. Part of the rules is you have to make SOME sense. Do this again and your account will be suspended or banned.

! Moderator Note Please read the rules for our Speculations section. You need to include some kind of supportive evidence in your explanation that persuades us that you have a point to make. The above doesn't come close. ! Moderator Note Also, let me deal with the Report you made re swansont's request for actual science. It wasn't obnoxious or idiotic, it was a couple of questions from a retired physicist about your OP. It wasn't false or misleading information, it was a couple of questions about your lack of rigor. It's also NOT nonsense or harassment, it's part of the rules you agreed to when you joined. Please do better.

This, this right here is a big part of the problem. Science has NOTHING to do with "deeply held beliefs". Read that a few times, please. In science, you have to trust what you choose to believe, and evidence is what you can base your trust in. You don't "deeply hold" a belief in chemistry; you perform experiments that show you over and over how various chemicals interact. You don't need faith or wishful thinking, you need to trust what the science has shown you, until it shows you that you need a better explanation. You seem to really WANT scientists to be as guilty in their "belief system" as religious folks are. You really WANT science to be just another religion with believers who might be wrong. Science is different because it's not asking you to believe in something that can't be observed or quantified, and it gives you a rigorous methodology for examining evidence that either supports or falsifies an explanation. If you challenge a scientific explanation with actual evidence, if you can devise an experiment that shows the explanation isn't sufficient, and can support that among your peers with testable science, your challenge can't be ignored, especially if it's supported by maths.

We've found, over the years, that trying to "think outside the box" requires you to have a firm grasp of what's "inside the box". No offense, but your mistake is in thinking you know enough about the subject to present new concepts. You've skipped the formal study of the subject so you have a bad foundation for understanding, and now you want to propose new concepts to replace the ones that don't make sense to you, because you skipped the formal study. Haven't ALL of your "new concept" threads been shown to have major flaws? You get critiques by experts, but you keep posting your new concepts. At no point do you ever say, "It seems I should take a formal course in this", so I'm not sure where the benefits for all involved are.

I've observed that fanning cool air to the face makes me feel just as comfortable in the heat as cooling the whole room with AC. It's like if the face feels cool the rest of the body agrees.

dimreepr has been suspended for a week for doubling down on some trolling.

! Moderator Note Honestly, it's difficult enough to moderate discussions on sensitive topics without dealing with trolls, especially when they've been members for quite some time. You need to sit the rest of this week out.

Does it sound like Canada and Mexico respect the decisions being made by the new administration? Around the world, this is being hailed as the stupidest, most moronic thing any country could do to it's closest allies and neighbors. If you have a trade deficit, perhaps it would be better to make something other countries want rather than punch them in the face for having better goods.

Something is wrong here. You don't think we approach your discussions in the spirit of science because they often get shut down. There's always a reason why speculative threads are closed. You also say being an amateur doesn't stop you from understanding physics. Why don't you understand the reasons given for shutting your threads down? When a thread is closed because it involves too much guesswork and not enough testable science, why don't you understand that? Why do you think it's not in the spirit of science? Do you think the spirit is supposed to encourage you to be less rigorous in your treatments? This is my frustration. If you understand, why can't you support your ideas using decent methodology? Does this make any sense at all to you?

! Moderator Note Putting more thought into your posts would look less like trolling. Do better, please.

The events might be designed to reduce the popular momentum a certain modern day Robin Hood is getting. We've been assured they aren't foreign or US military or any threat to the populace. Billionaire distraction?

! Moderator Note This is NOT a Quantum Theory. Moving to Other Sciences. What did you want to discuss about this subject? We aren't looking for a blog or a lecture, or for anything an AI has to say on the subject. We're looking for a conversation with YOU. Please give a direction so members can respond.

The idea of a businessperson being able to lead a country is laughable. Countries don't operate like businesses. Countries HAVE to arrange priorities differently, while every single business needs to make a profit. Profit is NOT on a country's list of priorities anywhere. A democracy like the US should be paving the way for the success of all its citizens, not just the richest. The billionaires have sucked dry most people's ability to prosper by valuing their own efforts several hundred times more than the efforts of the average person. None of the businessmen who've been POTUS have done anything spectacular for the country. Bush II took a balanced budget and a surplus (federal deficit erased) and left the country with US$3.293T (Trillion) in deficits, and gave away our ability to negotiate drug prices with Big Pharma. TFG was twice as bad in half the time. You may love them, but billionaires and businesspeople are NOT out to help others, and that should be the key asset of any politician. Public servants aren't splashy and entertaining, but they also give a shit about everyday people, unlike the billionaires who exploit them for profit. Public servants aren't taught to Deny, Defend, Depose.

It may be a focus for this article about a book, but the fact is people all over the world don't trust their media. Russia, China, Japan, the US, the EU, you name the country and the young people there (and many of the older people too) don't trust what their media is telling them. Perhaps we could broaden the focus of this topic, seeing as it's NOT a problem only "the West" is having. It's hard to trust people posting on social media as well, considering many are openly pushing their own agendas. Maybe even paid to do so.

This isn't a phenomenon found only in "the West". Russia is having the same problem, as is any country that favors authoritarians that undermine the social fabric of their countries. Costs of living increase, wages don't, and the super wealthy are allowed to use their money in ways they shouldn't be able to. The media in the US has no obligation to inform, and instead appreciates when we all have to spend more time deciphering the news. This problem is worldwide, atm.

I don't see this as productive at all. You dislike religion, so you create your own?! Non-participation is also an option. This isn't like saying you dislike store-bought bread so you make your own. This is like saying you dislike your astrological sign so you came up with something you like better. It may not be a specific religion you dislike, but rather the whole concept, in which case it may be better to ignore it completely.

You're only comparing salaries. The fact is, even "highly paid" tech workers are being underpaid compared to the profit they bring to the companies. Even a senior engineer salary at Apple is smaller than it should be compared to the US$391B in annual revenue they earned this year. It's been this way in the US for quite some time. It's pretty easy to see the trend. In the 50s, a household only needed one worker to afford a home, a couple of cars, and even college tuition for a couple of kids. After Nixon, it's been getting steadily worse here, until now most families have two workers and still struggle to maintain a home and vehicles.

Billionaire personality traits like paying people less than they're worth so the billionaire can have more? If you look at how productivity in the US continues to grow while wages haven't kept up since Nixon, you can see how billionaires get richer while getting more work from the rest of us for less overall pay. Their profit is basically our struggle. The more they profit, the more the rest of us have to struggle. Billionaire personality trait #1? Pretend your resources are worth 600 times what the labor to turn them into a product is worth, and pay workers as little as possible. Make them struggle.

I'm done with it. Nobody who voted for him is worth my time if they can't draw a line somewhere. The Access Hollywood tape was the deal-breaker for me, way back then. It was morally indefensible, but politically acceptable for some. Now I can say proudly that I consider consent to be important, and you know exactly who I voted for.

It's easier than you think, you just have to be honest. I'm far too racist for my own tastes, but I'm learning and growing. I've lived with racism my entire life, and I don't fool myself into thinking it hasn't affected me, and that helps me avoid discrimination (for the most part). I'm sorry you feel that way. I see it as an attempt to overturn the rule of law, and normalize discrimination by taking a moral stance and trying to make it political. I don't see equal rights as a talking point, but you obviously do. I absolutely am arguing that more than half of Americans are racists. I don't appreciate your lumping the rest in as a strawman, I have no patience for that crap anymore. Fascism is also applicable, but is a separate argument. I think any white American who thinks this society hasn't taught them to discriminate against many different groups is just trying to make a distinction between themselves and the more obvious racists who don't want to change. You can have racist thoughts and realize they're wrong, that they're part of an upbringing that you need to unlearn. What's proven ineffective in two elections is stopping the interference from foreign powers using our lack of informative sources to prejudice the American people. The media is entertainment rather than information, and coupled with an uneducated electorate we get folks voting to remove their own rights and safeguards. Good luck without NOAA, Florida!

What do you mean "she wasn't chosen"? She was elected as VP, voted into office by the People. What's the role of the VP, you might ask? One part is to take over when the president can't fulfill the duties. And Biden left us one of the strongest economies in recent history. So strong it encouraged US corporations to price gouge their own customers, knowing the uneducated would blame Biden, as if POTUS has control over private companies and what they charge. And yet you don't bother to link to it here. I'm going to assume you made it up. OTOH, TFG has decades of ruining people's lives under his belt: https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/13/politics/trump-small-business-owners/index.html https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/columnists/mike-kelly/2020/01/24/donald-trump-still-owes-money-to-contractors-who-built-taj-mahal-atlantic-city/4547037002/ https://nj1015.com/trump-stiffed-hundreds-of-workers-and-contractors-in-new-jersey-report-says/ https://theweek.com/articles/783976/brief-history-trumps-smalltime-swindles https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hundreds-claim-donald-trump-doesn-t-pay-his-bills-n589261 He's a swindler, so I assume you cheat people too. None of this is a deal breaker for you. People like you and him kill thousands of decent Americans every year. He's a racist, so I assume you hate people of color too. None of the bigotry and prejudice bothers you enough to make it a deal breaker. People like you and him discriminate against the only known humans in the universe, and ignore the diversity of life we have on this planet. I hope you don't pass this behavior to the next generation. He's fooled you because of all your ignorance and hatred. You're the poorly educated people he truly loves. Harris kept trying to tell you what she was going to do for us. TFG keeps telling you who he's going to punish, and you evangelicals just lap it up. It's all about punishment and atonement and how shitty humans naturally are, and now you have the shittiest human on the planet as your leader. Get down on your knees and take him there!

Not everyone. I thought MAGA wanted smaller government. All the offices you guys don't like will now be run by people who don't know what they're doing. You and I will be paying the salaries of thousands of federal employees who will be working hard to destroy those agencies. Their only qualification is loyalty to POTUS/Emperor. Big fan of the Russian invasion? Most people don't like Putin the way you seem to. Do you? It doesn't seem that way. I think you just voted to raise your own taxes to pay for a government loyal to one man. Elephant in the room? That's one of the first indicators for me for anybody's job performance. Most of the people who worked for him the first time refuse to be loyal to him now. They haven't exactly been quiet about how dangerous TFG is. Please elaborate on Kamala Harris' major faults.

He doesn't tell his own uneducated base that the tariffs are so he can exempt his friends and punish those who won't kneel: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/23/us/politics/trump-tariff-exemptions.html Openly corrupt, morally barren, and a convicted felon. And so many people are OK with that, and want him as their leader.

This would be a fantastic claim to support with any evidence you've researched.