Phi for All

Welcome back, man. Are you still at the other end of 93 from me or did you move?

I guess it's a miracle that the Hebrew priests who wrote Leviticus had a word for turkey since they'd never seen one before.

REALLY?! You went for THAT whore/sun pun and missed the whole "She solar body for science" bit?

! Moderator Note It was motivated by the fact that I thought I'd moved it there pages and pages ago in response to someone reporting it. I sincerely apologize to the membership for keeping it in a mainstream section for so long. Mea culpa.

I remember that the carrion-eaters were considered unclean. Turkeys? They had turkeys in the Middle East back then? I don't think so, but maybe you're talking about a variant of the American turkey.

YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE WITCHCRAFT!!!

The bubble edges are a little disconnecticated!

Don't forget the POPCORN!!!

A couple of generations ago, the Baker boys were all hot for Miss Candlestickmaker, so the smell of money has replaced patchouli as a selective pressure.

! Moderator Note Let's aim those guns at the ideas please, and not the people who have them. No more personal attacks.

You probably got that the first time you watched the movie, but it took you five years to stop asking about being a moderator.

The staff was seriously considering your application, and then you said this.

I told you it didn't matter if you turned the puzzle upside down. Straight edges are going to be assumed to be the outside edge, but nice strawman. What's really ironic is you claiming to be an autodidact yet your consistency in failing to properly read and understand what we've been writing makes it seem like you ignore what doesn't support your assertions. What did you think I meant by "The order isn't important"? Shouldn't someone who is teaching themselves be more worried about cherry-picking their information? An edge isn't "proof" that it's going on the outside of the puzzle you're doing. I've experienced trying to put a jigsaw together that had four pieces from another puzzle mixed in, so at best an edge is supportive evidence that leads one to assume it's part of the outside edge. 11% is far from the majority.

LOL. Make it like what? The only assumption I made was that you put the pieces together to complete the puzzle. It isn't really a jigsaw puzzle if you don't (unless you're moving the goalposts again). The order isn't important. I don't even care if you put it together face down. When you see a piece that has a straight edge, you aren't going to even try to put it in the middle. You're going to assume it belongs on the outside edge because that's what you suppose will be the case, even though there isn't any proof that it will be. And you test that assumption as you analyze and hypothesize about where those edge pieces will fit because you will be looking for a match along the outermost edge, not the middle. There's nothing unscientific about those kinds of assumptions, as long as you're testing them to make sure reality-based evidence continues to support them.

People who are happy with a product aren't as likely to praise it publicly as those who are unhappy with it will complain about it. For every person who complains publicly there are tens of thousands of people who experience no problems, generally. Please understand that comments about why you're questioning established products IN NO WAY mean we're questioning why you want to learn to read labeled ingredients. You're being smart about that part. The questions are because you seem to be putting a lot of significance on a few vocal complaints and ignoring the fact that these products are still being purchased by a large enough customer base to keep these companies profitable. Market economics suggests these products are not dangerous to a very large amount of those who use them.

You make the assumption that the pieces with a straight side go on the outside. You also further assume (in a landscape puzzle, at least) that the sky-colored pieces with a straight side go on the top edge. The four pieces with right angles on them are assumed to be the corners. This isn't analysis, it's assumption based on previous knowledge.

False Dilemma. You do both. Communicating your ideas is part of the process. Why do you want to propose your ideas if not to communicate with others about them? Review of your work by others is probably the best part of the methodology. No matter how much you think you know, you can't begin to touch the sum of knowledge possessed by everyone else who would read your work.

One of the Mous quadruplets, brother to Blasph E, Ven E and Magnan I.

Meteors compress the air in front of them and that generates a great deal of heat. I forget what they call it, but this can cause them to burst before they hit the ground.

Step One - Grow wings out of your back.

The FDA only requires testing if you're making a medical claim or trying to use an ingredient that hasn't already been tested as safe. This is a cunning piece of marketing mendacity, because soaps using known ingredients don't have to go through the approval process, yet they make it sound like the manufacturers are deliberately putting harmful ingredients into their products and the FDA is ignoring it. In reality, if a manufacturer made any money from a product that hurt people, they'd lose it and more in the lawsuits that would follow. Longer shelf life or cheaper ingredients won't help you if no one will buy your product because it's harmful.

Drownings, floods, burst pipes....

"Harmful" needs to be defined. And some people are more sensitive to certain ingredients than others. I know they used to use Dimethicone to fill silicone breast implants but the industry switched to saline for safety reasons. Dimethicone is an approved ingredient in many products used on skin. I wouldn't think a skin care company would last long using ingredients that were dangerous to a significant portion of their customers. Are you experiencing any adverse effects from this skin care product?

Recipe for misunderstanding: imatfaal going back to all the places he visited yesterday, asking, "Have you seen my penis?"

We're certainly not the only creatures who've caused the extinction of other species, but we're the only ones I know of who actively work to preserve other species as well. Would any other species hesitate to kill and eat its favorite prey if it knew the prey was one of the last few of its kind? I think part of our problem is not thinking of ourselves as part of nature, that human civilization is evil because it can negatively impact other species. We are part of nature, so whatever we do we is natural even if it's not the smartest thing to do in the long run. If there is anything we can do better than any other species, it's thinking in long-range terms, and we just don't do enough of that lately. If we can start exercising that part of our intellect more, then I would definitely say this world is better off having us here.