Phi for All

Well, since you're still stuck in the box, and you actually wish to interact with the house rather than just defiling the floor of whatever room you're in, you'd have to assume someone moved you into the house's bathroom, close enough to the toilet for this to be effective. Or perhaps right on top of the toilet, depending on where you're cutting the hole, what gender you are and how thorough a job of bathroom-going you plan on accomplishing. And even if we assume you're just a guy cutting a hole big enough to pee through, we further have to assume you have the... reach to be able to make this practical. That's really too many assumptions for a riddle, don't you think? I mean, I'd be a bit angry if the answer was that convoluted. Technically, you wouldn't just be "in" a box, you'd be more like "standing in" a box. And again, technically, if the box is open, you've just changed the definition of "box" to include "open box". Is it just the vertical sides that define a box? How many more iterations will it take before you have me standing on a flat piece of cardboard that you're still calling a box? I use this word "technically" because this is a puzzle after all. The OP stated a simple premise that seemed to have a simple answer. Ah, but that's usually where the "puzzle" part comes in. One tries to find some technicality to exploit to come up with an answer that's not so simple (well, some people do). And just like I'd be a bit irked if the answer is some convoluted stretch of the imagination with all kinds of caveats and assumptions not implied in the OP, I'd consider it a spectacular waste of time if the answer was the simple one, that you are in both a house and a box. Not a great riddle, that. Hey, that IS a good one. You should start your own puzzle thread instead of hijacking this one, Hardly. I love that joke, though I'm not at all surprised you never understood it before now.

Well, nice try, Lucky, but you're still functioning as a human while you're in your skin or your clothes (although you really can't be "out" of your skin, that's a bad analogy). If you're in a box in a house, you're in a box. You can't do anything you normally do in a house. You can't use the bathroom, go to the fridge, you can't even do the most basic thing to change being "in" a house: you can't go "out". Why? Because you're in a box. The box is in a house. The puzzle requires a human in the box, not a laptop, so let's toss out that bizarre example. And a human only partially in a bag, not fully enclosed? Ridiculous.

I have more DVDs than Blu-ray movies, and I'm finding the Blu-ray players I've had don't play them as well. The disks freeze in spite of being in pristine condition. I get a lot of "No Disk" messages also. I'm also concerned about the investment. Blu-ray took such a long time to dominate the market, and what with the economic slump, I find the hardware to be very cheaply made. The first Blu-ray player I had had to have the buttons on the top because it was too light to push them from the front. I'm wondering how much to invest in a physical format when downloading technology seems to be getting much better.

What a fascinating piece of technology! The industry obviously failed to get the market primed for this new format change, what with the economy and consumers that are getting tired of the hype. The technology itself is pretty great, quality-wise. I'm not that into the depth of experience offered with Blu-ray movies, watching the endless "making-of", deleted scenes and inside stories offered, but the picture and sound quality are definitely a cut above. My problem is that, with the earlier format war with HD DVD and the slow market, the Blu-ray players have moved past my original dilemma of how to keep playing my DVD collection while building a new format library and are now into streaming Netflix and Pandora and trying to act like my smart phone for versatility. I run Netflix through my Wii console so I'm really just looking for a player that plays both Blu-ray and DVDs but I'm on my second Blu-ray player and it's now refusing to be consistent with the old format. I don't know if this is an attempt to push us further away from the old format, or if they are just skimping on something that will eventually die anyway, or if I'm just not spending enough on a player I only need to do one thing, play disk movies. I'd like to hear what others think of the technology, and what the economic slump means in terms of how long and how much and wtf is going on with Blu-ray.

They're not saying your hazmat reg is unofficial. It's an official regulation that affects only the manufacturers of hazardous materials. And only when they have to label something hazardous: It's too specific and brief to be anywhere near what the government would need to make English the official language of the whole country. It's just basically saying that if you are going to sell your hazardous products in the US, you have to warn people, in English, and provide enough information that they can check it out before using it.

ABSOLUTELY NOT! Don't you EVER try to start one of these preachy, overly-biased threads outside of the religion forums again. If you once tried to hold an honest discussion about these matters, things would be different, but it's abundantly clear you're not here to learn, you're here to teach, and preach, and rant, and rave. Do you ever plan on discussing science here sometime? ! Moderator Note Moved to Religion.

I've often wondered how much of aging is decay and how much is the result of applied wisdom? When we're young, we run up and down the stairs each time we need something or want to put something away. As we get older, we learn to be more efficient and start putting things on the stairs that need to go up, then take them all at once to save trips. And do our reflexes slow down as much as we think? I remember in my 20s when I saw a glass get pushed off the counter as I was doing dishes and I quickly slid my bare foot under it so it wouldn't break, barely catching it in time and risking slicing my foot open if I miscalculated. And I remember something similar happening in my 40s but I hesitated and let the glass break. Were my reflexes slower or was I simply more cognizant of what a serious foot injury could do to me, being now wise enough to quickly reason that a glass wasn't worth the lost days at work and the emergency room bills if I miscalculated? Doesn't accumulated knowledge affect how we live our lives? I certainly don't take as many physical chances as I once did. Is that because I'm not as physical as before or is that why I'm not as physical as before? It's not as important to me to catch every frisbee my family or friends throw like it was 30 years ago. I never thought about pulling a hamstring or the results of falling while running at full speed when I was young, but those are definite concerns now. What would accumulated knowledge do to us physically if we were immortal? I'm assuming the kind of immortality where we could die from serious injury but old age is not a concern. I suppose it would make a difference if we could regenerate damaged tissue but I still think wisdom and experience tempers our thought processes and makes us act differently. How differently would we act after a few thousand years?

This is the one that really makes me sad. It's creationist 101, and it's been handed down since the Scope's trial. It really shows that the speaker has no interest in understanding how evolution works, and is content to repeat the ignorant catch phrases of others. No offense meant to you personally, Brainteaserfan. This is a strawman argument I've heard my whole life, it's inaccurate, it's dishonest and it pains me to see it still is used on the youth in this country.

I really wish they would. This would accomplish several things. Congress would be showing the people that we've gotten along quite well up to this point without an official national language law, and that only something unlikely and drastic would ever create a need for one. It would also point out that we don't need a law for every damn thing, that common sense can be quite powerful when used more than occasionally. And lastly, since the majority of US citizens have no appreciation of subtlety, they would completely miss the point and have every member of Congress removed so we could start fresh.

Your situation seems better than average, and I'm not sure it's representative of homeschooling in most areas. I think you have a well thought out program that lends itself to creating great potential. Again, you may be an exception. Most young-earth creationists I've had discussions with believe all of science is suspect since they think it's deceiving everyone about the true age of the earth. And it's not just one small part of one subject. Geology, history, astronomy, biology, so many areas of education are affected when you ignore evidence of an ancient Earth. And not all homeschools are for religious reasons. In fact, some people in areas where religion takes precedence over education homeschool their kids to keep them away from public schools where the teachers fudge the curriculum in favor of their religion.

! Moderator Note You are once again in violation of our rules. If you can't abide by the rules you agreed to when you joined, you will be banned. If necessary, we can contact your ISP and lodge a formal complaint.

I think it varies as much as any educational environment. Great experiences and horrible ones, and everything in between. And like the environment, the students can vary the same way. I don't think there is an optimum way for everyone. Socialization definitely needs to be augmented, imo, but there are lots of after school activities, organizations and groups that can do that. Look at your average textbook and think about having to remove anything that talks about the world before 4000 B.C.E. Your books have to have pictures of dinosaurs and early humans co-existing. You can't get those in public schools.

Has anyone gotten an answer to a question you asked of exploration, or has it just been this dramatically punctuated preaching? Reality could be the target of a specifically named warhead. "SOPHISTICATE MISSILE" actually does sound like something that could exist in the US arsenal.

! Moderator Note exploration, you are ignoring specific questions being asked of you, a violation of our rules. What little can be successfully derived from your writings seems like preaching, which is a second violation. Please re-read the rules you agreed to when you joined the forum, and abide by them in the future. If you do not, your threads will be closed and you will be suspended or banished.

Wow, I mean WOW!!! Thanks for the new pictures! You're right, you have NOTHING to regret. I now know the true meaning of chemical hardening! We should definitely get together and discuss a new, um... activity series for my... metal. And my titration process should produce a cumplete reaction for both of us. Nice mole, by the way. HA! My socks are two drawers down! No problem. The Cap'n has a rather low flash point anyway. In fact, there's rumor he's homogenous.

So are you saying the answer to your riddle is "You're in both"?

Soooo... you're not Bobby "the Burner"? And you say he's dead?! That explains why you haven't responded to my blackmail threats. I guess I can throw all those naked pictures away....

! Moderator Note Please, no. This thread was not meant to be ontological in nature, let's not go there. Please stay on topic to keep this thread in the proper section.

Yesterday, I walked over to the hardware store and bought a bucket and a gallon of paint. Then I stopped by the feed store and picked up a couple of chickens and a goose. I'd left my truck at home and I was wondering how I could carry all this stuff home when mooeypoo walked by. I said, "Hey, moo, can you help me home with this stuff?" Mooey suggested, "Why don't you put the can of paint in the bucket. Carry the bucket in one hand; put a chicken under each arm and carry the goose in your other hand?" I said, "Why thank you very much! Can I walk you home?" She said sure and we started walking. On the way I said, "Let's take a short cut down this alley. We'll get you home quicker that way." She looked at me and said, "I'm a beautiful young woman and the alley is dark. How do I know that when we get in the alley you won't hold me up against the wall, pull up my skirt, and have your way with me?" I said, "Mooey! I'm carrying a bucket, a gallon of paint, two chickens, and a goose. How in the world could I possibly hold you up against the wall and do that?" Mooeypoo replied, "Set the goose down, cover him with the bucket, put the paint on top of the bucket, and I'll hold the chickens."

I always liked: There once was a hermit named Dave, who kept a dead whore in a cave. Said Dave, "I'll admit I'm a bit of a shit, but look at the money I save!"

Don't flame me, I didn't borrow it. Hellooooooo, one big eye left, I don't USE whips anymore! But I did borrow dave's cattle prod, if you wannabe trying some Italian.... Btw, I saw your reply to my message about those pills the vet gave my bull that made him service every cow I have, then break down the fence and service all my neighbors cows. I don't know the name of the pills, but they sort of taste like peppermint.

Overenthusiastic?! I've never met a woman like that! Perhaps you lack stamina? We have a special section for those ideas that diverge from accepted science. See Speculations. Is that Greek style or Italian?

Post Options below attachments.

You've been touching the manicotti again.

Technically, I still don't think so. Grammatically, no. Look at it this way: if you're a refrigerator, and you're in a box in a house, are you "in" the house or are you still in the box? Similarly, if you're a human, you're not "in" the house in a functional sense if you're in a box. You can't do anything you would normally do "in" a house, you can't even access the house itself if you're still "in" a box. Being in a box is your primary state. I think that would be lative case, not locative case, because you're implying motion to a location with the carriage the seat is in. You could dream?! We barely slept, naked outdoors....