Phi for All

I've had these dreams before as well, exactly as you and KyleLeClair have described. For me though, it didn't seem to have anything to do with becoming lighter. I felt it was definitely more of a Peter Pan, believe-you-can kind of power that kept me aloft rather than any kind of aerodynamic adaptation or weightlessness. I never needed to run or jump, but rather just knew it was possible to ascend into the air for as high as I cared to go. I've had auditory hallucinations along those lines before, but never at that scale. It's absolutely bizarre what our ears can convince our brains of, isn't it? I think most things people throughout history thought were miracles were simply misunderstood marching band waterfalls.

! Moderator Note This is a science discussion forum. We're looking for aspects of your idea (which is not a theory or a model) that we can discuss. Unless you give us a direction for such a conversation, all that can be done is to comment on what you post here. Our rules say you must present your idea here without going to your website or clicking links we don't trust. For instance, can you predict the height of a geostationary orbit using your idea?

! Moderator Note No bots, please.

Is this the same event? That's hilarious! Come to think of it, I've seen some DG with the name Somerdale Cooper Hill. Yes. I stopped buying cheap food and started buying less food overall, but all top quality. Start another cheese thread in Physics or Biology! Hard cheeses are what the cardiologists all recommend, and I agree with you on that Costco parm. You're talking about the big wedge, right, not the pre-shredded? I suppose I could cut it down to Jarlsberg only, as long as I get some sort of official medical exemption in writing. Maybe a bracelet with a big J in the middle of a red cross or something. And I definitely want a senior discount at the store when I buy my dairy medications.

It may be cheaper here, but all gourmet items have gone up so much lately that it's tough to figure accurately. Many imported cheese prices have pegged somewhere around $17.99/pound, which seems to be the point where Americans question their love. A couple of years ago, Jarlsberg was about $11/pound when other Swiss cheese is about $7-8/pound. One of my favorite cheeses they promote in my local stores is called Cotswold, a double Gloucester with chives and onion they claim is from the UK. Is this a real English cheese, or is this like English muffins over here?

! Moderator Note Sorry, this is a science discussion forum. If there's something about Merge Sort or Quick Sort you'd like to discuss, please give us some direction, otherwise, as a new member, it looks like you're just trying to use us to push traffic to your blog. Thanks for understanding.

This company sounds interesting: https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/666725

! Moderator Note I understand the suspicion when a new member posts like others who've had an agenda. We've certainly seen plenty of spammers start out as informative resources before slipping in a link to their blog in violation of the rules. But staff would like to see everyone give new members the benefit of the doubt, and if you feel a poster is breaking the rules or spirit of the site, we have the Report Post feature so we don't take a thread off topic. Thanks for your understanding.

! Moderator Note This is a science discussion forum. Can you give us a framework within which we can discuss your work? This seems more like an artistic expression than a Brain Teaser or Puzzle. What science can we discuss?

! Moderator Note Thank you for using the Report Post function. This seems more like a misplaced humor rather than active trolling. Reminder to all, we're in the Medical Science section, and replies should reflect that!

! Moderator Note The OP has not engaged in discussion with those patient members who bothered to supply some science, and instead has chosen to stand on a soapbox and wave a metric into existence with their hands. This fails all the parameters for Speculations. Thread closed.

We don't delete anything. People put work into their posts, no matter how they're received, so at most we move the posts into the Trash. Still here, still readable, but nobody has to waste time responding to concepts that can't pass basic tests and smell like word salad. If you'd like to learn some science, I suggest you stick around and read.

! Moderator Note It was worth a try, thanks for the attempts at reason by the reasonable. Thread closed.

My point about all white males being suspect was lost on more than just you. Stop thinking from your own perspective and put yourself in somebody (almost anybody) else's shoes. Black people don't know which white males to trust. Neither do Latinx or Asian folks. Women especially have to watch out for resentful, hateful, ignorant white men who think women are the cause of all their problems. How could they possibly tell the difference between me and you just by looking? If I'm not with my wife, you and I might look the same in that regard. I might be the one who holds hostility towards women because they won't have sex with me. I know you hate facts and statistics, but I don't know another way to actually show you how white men are the main suspects in all sorts of crimes against women. I know you wanted to come here to explain an idea you had about science but instead started talking about how oppressed you are by women and intellectuals. It's obviously a big hangup for you, but this is a discussion forum. We'd like to think you might actually LISTEN to some of the points being made, but you haven't yet, so I don't think your ideas are best for conversation with adults. This isn't the echo chamber you've been spending time in, listening to other men disparage women to make themselves feel better. In this type of discussion, we use reason to help others see our points of view, to persuade them that there are other ways to look at a problem. I haven't seen much that's reasonable from you. It's great that you've taken the time to respond to so many replies, but your responses make it seem like women and intellectuals are printing up "Keep kicking Greg A!" t-shirts just because you're so perceptive about the True Nature of the World. Regardless, it's easy to see you misinterpret most of what's being said to you, so in that regard a science discussion forum will probably do you more harm than good. You just don't understand what we're talking about when it comes to supportive evidence and critical thinking skills. I love discussing topics with the members here, mostly because the rest of them know what reason (and irony) looks like.

I wish you could hear what we hear when you post things like this.

The thread began 18 years ago? I'm going to go with that. ... to the response you so wanted to give yet didn't? I so wanted to listen to it but you didn't respond.

Interesting read. I was hoping the Times article about medical sexism could shed some light on why 19th century American women conspired to foment war between the North and South in order to wipe out all the men and create a single-sex society. Alas, no.

So, by that same reasoning, WWII was more about killing animals than anything else? The fatalities were mostly horses and dogs. In modern times, the US lost less than 3000 troops in Afghanistan, but but wiped out half the total livestock population. Was the underlying influence of that war to kill goats?

... with stall walls covered in executive Sharpie memos.

Don't forget the crimes we haven't even heard about yet. My first thought was that we're going to hear about something Alex Jones confessed about Trump, or that someone checked Trump's Twitter feed and found a comment that supports him being taken to Walter Reed to remove a wad of chewed up documents from his colon. But you're right, that he's a suspect held zero surprise for anyone.

Have you all thought about how much evidence was needed for a judge to sign off on a warrant like this?

But that's not because of censorship, or because you're speaking some kind of Truth we want hidden. It's because your predictions aren't based on anything you can explain. We gave you pages to explain yourself, but you mostly used that time to cry about censorship and how oppressed you are. We pointed out how many of your "observations" were incorrect, and we provided data that supported that. You didn't bother, so we assumed you had no evidence. We asked you many questions hoping to draw out more information about your ideas, and again you ignored those you couldn't answer. That's why your ideas won't make it into the textbooks. Accuracy is one of the hallmarks of science, and scientists are always going to be triple-checking for it.

This is the "All lives matter" argument again. It's not bigoted to want the discrimination against women and BIPOC folks by white men to stop. Can you tell me how they're supposed to know how you're a "good white guy"? Did you build a toxicity meter yet? Right now, a lot of these folks have to treat all white men the same, because the consequences of misreading which are good is too steep.

I don't know about that, but I did see a thread last year on another science discussion forum where three of our old crackpots (I recognized the names but can't recall them now) were expounding on an idea one of them had stitched together with guesswork, wild hairs, and thin ice. Talk about clusterfuck! It was just those three, and they each had differing "theories" about why relativity is wrong, and none of them could explain it to the others, just like they couldn't explain it to us. It ended up looking like a word salad food fight, and the only thing they could agree on was how wrong Einstein was.

"Common" usually means more than 1 in 100. "Risky" is purely subjective, and something only you and your doctor can assess. That said, I wouldn't risk a 1 in 100 chance when the side effect is so opposed to my objective. If I want to keep my hair because I think it makes me attractive, why risk impotence? Finasteride isn't a "cure" for androgenetic alopecia. At best it can help you keep hair you currently have. The attitudes towards male baldness are changing for the better (much faster, easier acceptance than women are getting, certainly). You might want to consider getting rid of the "ruff" and embracing total baldness. I'm blessed with an almost full head of hair at my age, but I'd pluck it all out by the roots rather than risk a 1% chance of impotence.