Phi for All

That's good for another warning. I can't believe you're ignoring all the posts where you are being called out for fallacious logic. Appeal to Tradition, Hasty Generalizations, Strawmen, when people point these out they are rebutting your arguments. If I could give you a second warning for this post I would. Go back and reread. Cheggitau: This backpedaling from "docile" to "conformist" was a hoot. As Mokele and others pointed out, there is an aspect of enslavement in the word docile that is non-existent in the word conformist. I think you realized it too but were too stubborn to admit it and JUST LET IT DROP. Well, in the middle of writing this I got notification that Mokele has closed the thread and suspended you for a couple of weeks. I had come to the same conclusion myself. No doubt it will do no good. You'll seethe for a while and themn come back to whine some more. I am really disappointed in you, aswokei.

Yes you can, and should. Stop taking advice from Sam and see a psychiatrist. Not a psychologist, a psychiatrist. And before you say it, seeing one doesn't mean you're crazy. You have a problem with these games and you need someone who is trained to help you overcome it. Don't look for quick fixes on the Internet. Our "opinions" won't help you. Get help now whatever the cost. You're probably worth it.

Your "yo-yo" can be up to half a meter wide, deep and tall and have a 6 meter "string". This gives you quite a bit of room to work with. You can't light it up first so you'll need some kind of centrifugal switch that starts your lights from battery power. It needs to traverse the string slowly and the key there is that your "yo-yo" can change size once it starts. I'd use spokes which slip out easily (engaging your electrical circuit) and make it spin slower. These spokes could be made from conduit (with stops to ensure they don't fly off) and then could be drilled with holes for the whistling effect. Does that help?

Spotted this idea for a solar furnace. Might be pretty cool. I mean hot.

Any further postings which call for acceptance or argument of unaccepted physics (non-mainstream) will be considered thread hijacking and will incur an official warning. The Speculations forum is for hypotheses which have not undergone the verification process. Please stop interjecting comments on your personal research in the Physics section until such time as you have been published and peer-reviewed.

Can you provide a link to the research or give us a direction for further comment? What do you think the "something more" might be?

Enough. I count seven members, including two Mods, who thought your comments on feminine docility were too general to be considered acceptable. The rest of the argument has been you trying to unsuccessfully defend those statements. You chose not to provide any studies to back up your claims. You have no supporters and you've now turned this into a scuffle over Mod abuse. You're acting like a little kid who keeps annoying a bigger kid and then cries "bully" when he gets swatted. No one has any more time for this. I'm sorry your feelings got hurt when someone objected provocatively to your provocative statements. If you can't take the heat.... If there is no more interest in the thread subject then we don't need this thread open anymore.

"A" thread? All his threads are like this. While this one didn't require his attention there have been several where people asked for clarification and never got it. 191 posts, 93 were thread starters. He/she is a voyeur.

I think every Moderator has a crap threshhold. Mine may be higher than Mokele's but it's not unlimited. You have trolled this thread enough and it started before Mokele gave you a warning. Bringing up Christians and abortion clinics is a clear strawman. I don't remember this kind of posting from you before, aswokei. Please reread the thread and remember that this is a science forum where people are held to a very rigorous standard when it comes to blanket assertions and fallacious arguments.

Good call. Doh! I think you're both headstrong and unrelenting. I think you're both passionate in your views. I think you're belaboring the point and you're lucky Mokele hasn't shown up in Georgetown to knock over all your buildings. I think Mokele feels that stomping hard on a fire keeps it from spreading. And I think he has big feet. And I think any arousal I might have felt about this thread has been diminished to the point of non-existance.

And what happens when someone files a complaint because they overheard someone using it as a term of endearment? Not everyone who hears a conversation feels the same way about the words used.

That's another good one everybody should learn, that in science "theory" does not mean "idea" (ala, "What's your theory?"). The popular sound byte "conspiracy theory" has also harmed science tremendously by equating theory with wacky paranoia.

Raising the taxes to the level the Europeans pay is a bit extreme (I'm still smiling about paying $1.93/gallon at Costco on Monday). Personally a bump at the pump won't affect me that much as I work from home and my business driving is reimbursed by the company but if we go to $6+ a gallon (even over a five year period) the ripple effects would be terrible. How much more am I going to pay for goods and services that use gasoline and will it be totally offset by the few thousand dollars I save in income tax? I think the UKers will tell you that Inland Revenue cuts them no slack. The problem with promising less income taxes if we pay higher sales taxes (on anything) is that the income taxes may just creep up again anyway. I've seen this happen with local government. Lottery funds that go to the parks system sound great, but then the parks system budget is adjusted and the surplus is used elsewhere - zero savings to the taxpayer. In the corporate sector an announced decrease in cereal prices is offset by a higher price for bread, and within a few years the cereal prices are right back to where they used to be - and now bread costs twice as much.

Hopefully you've learned that if you *mean* in general you should *say* in general. Some mistakes can't be left unchallenged or it lends them tacit support. You've tapdanced around this issue to support yourself but in the end you made one mistake and your refusal to acknowledge it has led to a really stupid argument and time has been wasted. Nothing is "implied" when you try to make a controversial blanket statement about half the world's population. Everyone on this board has made these same mistakes. Admit it and move on.

Everyone should know that the term "scientific fact" is mostly used by people who know nothing about science. Unfortunately most people can't be bothered by detailed research histories and gathered data so they fall prey when someone backs up their totally bogus assertions with the phrase, "It's a scientific fact!"

Ya think? Make sure you use a gang that has a no-payback policy. And get a receipt. If the police believe you the gang certainly won't. Guess who the gang targets next? At the very least you will be blackmailed for the rest of your life. Don't forget about all those undercover cops who nail people looking to hire a hit. Asking around about stuff like that is what pays an informant's rent. They'll snitch you out in a heartbeat.

Oh yes, I've heard about it. From you, as a matter of fact, over at PhysOrgForum, where you joined and posted this identical thread. Why the sneaky tactics? If you were serious about wanting rigorous review you should be willing to answer some questions and provide some data. Just because you claim your reactor will solve the energy crisis, cancer and air pollution all at the same time doesn't mean we won't listen.

Calling all women docile compared to all men, especially in the presence of all men, comes off as hostile and discriminatory, thus an example of misogyny. In addition to being a rather laughable generalization. Watch some C-Span, the WWF or the audience for Oprah. Or in the real world working for companies like mine. Actually I'm having a hard time thinking of any woman I know as "docile".

Go ahead and use the references. You're a trusted member and it sounds like you've found a great product and are simply entusiastically passing along a good reference. We probably jumped the gun when you first posted because we get so many Rolex ads and people joining just to post links to sales sites. Sorry, sorry, it'll never happen again, and by never I mean... somewhat frequently.

You don't confront friends, period. You talk to them, you reason with them. You didn't tell us what they claimed about the stones. Are they saying something like, "Hematite is said to have healing powers" or "Garnet is believed to have the power to cleanse the blood". Both those statements are true. Or are they saying, "Opals have been clinically proven to cure depression"?

The odds of hitting an asteroid with a manned spaceship are... astronomical. Proximity detection equipment and a few quick thruster bursts should take care of it. Absolutely, to a certain extent. That's what thrusters are for but you need more and more thrust to go faster and faster.

Intersystem travel is going to take a very long time so you need some way to keep your scientists in stasis during the trip (unless they will be raising families of scientists for the return trip). Btw, creating an artificial gravity isn't that difficult with present technologies. The design of the ship would have to let it spin to create the effect. I remember hearing that a trip from Earth to Proxima Centauri would take 70,000+ years.

And I would advise not sending any email to Mr. Sphincter. Feel free to give a salary range if need be.

It's your rank. Post more and it changes, making you a larger particle. General Discussion posts don't count though.

Ditto. For instance, the way to avoid those clever homicide detectives is to make it look like an accident. No murder, no murder investigation. There was a great Columbo episode where the killer almost got away with it by waiting for his victim at the end of his nightly swim before bed. When the guy was stepping up out of the pool the murderer brained him with a chunk of ice. He made sure the guy sank and then tossed the ice in the pool (no murder weapon was found). It was assumed by by all the investigators that the guy slipped on the diving board and drowned after hitting his head, total accidental death. All the investigators except Columbo....