MigL

I leave it up to you to decide which post was the lie. ( apparently the emoji didn't give you a clue ) But I notice you still haven't answered the question... what exactly was found at the LHC that would lead you to believe this ?

So maybe start working to understand these simple things, before trying to understand the 'death' of the Universe. Just a thought.

Yes you are . Put your affairs in order and pray to you God(s). And let's please move on.

Funny how you don't understand 'measurements'; a very simple grade school concept. Yet you have no problem making inquiries, and even predictions, about Betelguese going supernova, or vacuum decay. Maybe you should concentrate on the simple stuff. By the way, you are right . There is a conspiracy, on this forum, to keep the truth from you, and that is why your threads on vacuum decay keep getting shut down. The truth is the vacuum is only months away from decay, and it will destroy the universe. But that won't matter to any of us, since Betelguese will go supernova next week, and destroy all life on Earth.

Do you somewhat understand relativity Michel ? The imprint may 'vanish' for one observer, but it does not for another. Your now is NOT the same as another observer's now. And your past is NOT the same as another observer's past. The block universe is common to all observers; there is no 'outside' , nor 'preferred', vantage point. But every observer 'experiences' a differing 'now' foliation, and a differing past light cone, of the block.

You have been told numerous times, during the past week, the mechanisms for vacuum decay. And if you say you haven't I will put up ALL the links/quotes and call you much worse names than INow has. You have also been told that the general consensus is that no more phase changes and symmetry breaks are thought to be possible. But there is always a very slim possibility since the Higgs boson mass is close to the critical value; more research with the top quark will tell us for sure. So, not very possible, at all. But what exactly was found at the LHC that would lead you to believe this ? Please provide a LINK and a QUOTE. And don't say temperature < 0 again...

So then you agree... Inflicting inconvenience/harm on one group in an effort to affect another separate group, IS unethical and wrong ? Thanks Dim, I just hit 5000 posts. WHOOHOO ! ( that was my mission for this morning )

And while I'm on a roll... Isn't that the argument always used against the US when they impose sanctions on a country like Iran ? The US ( and others ) withholds supplies, which may cause hunger/starvation or even deaths, in the case of medical supplies, in an effort to get the Iranian people to change the way their ( oppressive ) Government does things. That is almost exactly the same. Inconveniencing and holding a group of people "hostage' in an effort to influence another group. Does anyone actually think that the 'just' cause is worth it to the family that loses a child because of lack of medication ? ( which couldn't get there by ViaRail, our shut down rail system; did you think I was still referring to Iran ? ) No, Im suggesting there are nuances and blanket statements don't cut it. A lot of the Canadian protesters are affluent and well fed.

Or, they live in an authoritarian/dictatorial society where they are not allowed. I don't recall any protests/rioting in Stalinist USSR, S Hussain's Iraq or KJU's N Korea. But I guarantee they are/were NOT well fed or content. But That's not what I'm asking for... If I have nothing to do with your 'cause', why does your protest need to inconvenience, distress or even hurt me ? Has our 'me' society degenerated to the point where only our own personal wants, needs and goals matter, and to hell with common curtesy and things that may be important to others ?

I don't follow ( and don't agree ) with your conclusions. Please elaborate.

I think we all know what you mean and the point you're trying to convey. However, it becomes that much harder to correct new members using non-standard terminology when one of our more senior/respected members modifies accepted scientific terminology to bolster a point. ( next thing you know, some new age fanatic will come along and say the Earth has feelings... )

The answer is right there on TV re-runs of The Big Bang Theory. Use a quantum liquid for the gyroscopic mass. It would be self-balancing and have minimal friction. I'll leave it up to someone else to work through the 'trivial' implementation issues ( )

from the Wiki entry on Prof Challenger "Challenger hoped through this experiment to prove that the Earth was a living organism that sustained its vitality from the ether of outer space" There is no aether . "Two out of three ain't bad" From the album Bat Out of Hell, released 1977, by the artist Meatloaf. There is lots of things I don't know, Dim, but useless trivia isn't one of them.

So Dim... You listen to Meatloaf when you're stoned ? ( this is becoming a running joke )

Just to throw more clichés into the mix, does the end justify the means ? If something is perceived by some, to be for the greater good, does it justify removing/modifying some people's rights ? Or to put it in an easily understood context, did G W Bush have the right to remove some privacy rights in order to ensure the safety of society ( WRT terrorism ) ? Getting back to the Canadian situation, these laws ( that could be unjust ) are currently in place. The government is allowing people to break these laws, occupy publically funded services that people rely on ( not just for vacations ), and waiting for a 'meaningful dialogue' to resolve the matter. Since I now consider our taxation laws, which fund these publically owned services, to be unjust, as I can't make use of them, do I have the right to withhold some of my taxes in protest ? Do you think Revenue Canada will consider 'meaningful dialogue', or will I get a visit from the RCMP ?

By any definition, something that is alive, must Feed Expel waste Reproduce None of those criteria are met by the closed system that is planet Earth. The metaphysical is not scientific.

SHUT UP ! It's 10 pm and you guys are making me hungry. I shouldn't eat at this time, but now I want a chicken sandwich.

I don't think I was very clear, Zap. If dimensions are lacking, i.e. a state of quantum foam, then there is no geometry. And geometry IS space-time. Without spacetime there is no 'prior'. Nor a 'when', or even a smaller 'time' increment. ( of course this is all based on Bufofrog's presumption of 'no dimensions' )

Seems the Politics forum has 'stalled'. I know ranger and JC will appreciate this, but I'm hoping the larger group finds it interesting. A gas pipeline has been approved for northern BC, with agreements signed by the ELECTED Native tribal chiefs of the affected lands. The HEREDITARY chiefs, however are opposed. https://www.ecowatch.com/pipeline-protests-canada-indigenous-2645171362.html?rebelltitem=2#rebelltitem2 Protests by natives, and sympathizers have been going on for quite some time and have spread across the country. The main form of protest has been the disruption of transportation, mostly rail, as far as eastern Ontario. Our Government refuses to take any action, and would rather wait for 'dialogue' to settle the situation; meanwhile close to 85,000 train trips have been cancelled since Feb 6. And the RCMP and various Police forces will not restore law and order as they have been 'burned' by Governments before ( Oka and Ipperwash ). Also, to be clear, I don't wish to discuss the pipeline, its benefits or problems; I wish to discuss valid/legal/accepted forms of protest in a lawful, ordered society, without people running others over, as in Charlottesville So what do polite Canadians do ? Obviously everyone has the right to protest what they see as an unfair/unjust action. But does my right to protest trump your right to go to work, on vacation, visit sick friends or go to a hospital ? I always thought it was fairly simple... Everyone has rights. But my rights stop when they start infringing on the rights of others.

No dimensions implies no geometry, and consequently, no time. In which case... What does 'prior' mean ?

That isn't what I meant. And you didn't understand that either.

Exactly. And that's the problem.

You made a promise on Apr 15, 2016... "Because of biased unfair lying mods I am closing my profile account now." And you've broken that promise. Very un-Christian of you. We don't come to your Christian forum and argue without faith Why do you need to come to our Science forum and argue with no evidence.