MigL

You have to wonder when people like S Spicer are going to realize that all their ass-kissing, and bowing at the altar of D Trump, will never get them anything. The very first time they have a difference of opinion, no matter how small, with D Trump, he will turn on them and try to ruin them, just as he has done with all the other 'useful idiots' during his previous administration. Do these arguably intelligent people actually believe the shit they are spewing for the 'orange clown's benefit ? Or are they doing it in the hope of some personal gain in the midterm, or next Presidential elections ? Can the short term gain be worth the ruin of a political carreer ? ( apparently a lot of Republicans think so )

Mass presupposes an instantaneity while electromagnetism does enegry in motion – two separate instances; as it were, which is first, the chicken or the egg? In the context of our local circumstances I could say it’s their combined effect under the auspices of instantaneity, can gravity be adduced. Please don't attribute quotes to me that were, in fact, posted by kba. Quote the original post please, not a quote of a quote. Thank you. I don't know what any of your post is supposed to mean. Mass and energy are both equivalent properties of a system; energy is the property that allows for changing the configuration of the system, and do work, while mass, the property that resists change in the configuration of the system, is responsible for inertia. No chickens or eggs involved.

It would be much simpler to model/sum gravitational potentials.

Sure. We'll throw out all observational evidence from the last 90 years, and make up stuff so that your theory is valid. \\\\astronomers say cosmological red shift is very different from gravitational red shift. And, that you are totally wrong !

Even if I could understand what you mean by 'electromagnetic field represented inside particles as mass', I don't need to answer why a 'free-form' electromagnatic field doesn't generate gravity. Because it DOES !

Maintaining speed, in the absence of extraneous forces, requires no energy.

You don't need much red Phosphorus to make Crystal Meth, as the red Phosphorus is re-used. The Pseudoephedrine and Hydroiodic acid are the raw materials. Don't blow yourself up ...

Are you saying all galaxies should have Cosmological red shifts equivalent to gravitational red shift from 'climbing out' of the source galaxy ? And not a red shift linearly dependent on distance, proportional to Hubble's constant ? That will come as a surprise to astronomers ...

There seems to be some confusion about the 'relation' of supernovae and the Big Bang event. There is none. The Big Bang produced about 3/4 Hydrogen, 1/4 helium and traces of Lithium and other light elements. This is what formed the first stars. Stars, during their lifetimes, produce some heavier elements, up to Iron, during successive higher temperature core fusion processes. Supernova explosions can actually supply enough energy to produce some even heavier elements, but most are produced when the end product of nova/supernova explosions, neutron stars, collide. Newer stars are 'seeded' with these heavier elements. Our Sun, which ignited about 5 billion years ago, is one such star, and our rocky/metallic planets are a result of the metal rich gas that went into the formation of our Solar System.

I don't think the two cases are remotely related. Almost all of the proton's mass is in the 'field'. The constituent quantum particles ( quarks ) are 'point-like', and don't have a position/momentum until interacted with.

A little late to the party; TSMC has been doing 7nm for a couple of years and is set to introduce their 2nm process in about a year and a half. "In semiconductor manufacturing, the 2 nm process is the next MOSFET (metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor) die shrink after the 3 nm process node. As of May 2022, TSMC plans to begin risk 2 nm production at the end of 2024 and mass production in 2025;[1][2] Intel forecasts production in 2024,[3] and South Korean chipmaker Samsung in 2025." 2 nm process - Wikipedia But what has any of this have to do with Russia's invasion of Ukraine ???

I find it funny ( not the incident itself ) that the most gun-happy society in the world was so restrained in their response, when in most other countries ( even European ) it would have been seen as an attack and armed troops brought in to quell the insurrection. I can see National Guard troops on stand-by, for any such major functions, like certifying elections, in the future.

It may not 'vibrate' unless you count the cycles in years or decades, but you will certainly get different effects if you measure the gravity on one side of the Sun, with all the planets lined up towards you radially, than if they were lined up on the opposite side of the Sun ( it does happen ). Unless you are sufficiently distant, the Solar System can't be regarded as a CoM problem. The planetary gravitational wells act like small moving depressions along the wall of the much larger depression which is the gravitational well of the Sun.

I thought someone had already mentioned this ... ( must have been in another thread ) Even assuming 'change' is fundamental, by definition, Speed of Change = Change / Time, which, upon substitution gives Time = Change / ( Change / Time ) and cancelling out 'Change' gives the deeply meaningful ( HaHa! ) result Time = Time Would you care to try again with something that makes sense ?

Oh, you Americans ... so easily triggered. I, myself, do NOT believe J Biden's election is questionable. That is my opinion, based on facts as I understand them. However, 2 out of 5 Americans are questioning the election results. That makes J Biden's victory questionable to 40 % of Americans; does it not ??? The reasons, founded or unfounded, are not in question, as those are THEIR opinions, based on ( or lack of ) facts as they do ( or don't ) understand them.

I did not say it was questionable to me. But it certainly is to a large number of the American populace. That is fact; not opinion. See story in The Guardian for evidence "More than 40% in US do not believe Biden legitimately won election - poll" ( I'm unable to post a link to the article ) Does that comply with Rule 2.12 Swansont ?

I'm with JC on this one. It is certainly 'questionable'. As evidenced by 40 % of your citizens believing J Biden did not actually win. IOW, it is being questioned by the electorate.

The ppoint you fail to understand, is that they won't. Russia, on the other hand, thinks it can, and will. That is the reason for NATO. HaHa Most Americans might find gas and food a little more expensive, but they still have more vehicles than household members, and are too well fed to the point of obesity. What are the Russian people eating these days ? Do you remember the bread lines of the 80s and 90s ? Maybe V Putin should stop buying weapons, and be a little nicer to the Ukrainians who supply Russia with wheat, instead of just taking it and letting Ukrainians starve by the millions, like J Stalin did.

My apologies; guess I misinterpreted this

Yes you are. Your link says 'failing state'. You say already 'failed'. And I said 'literal' and 'original' in reference to overturning Roe vs Wade. Not the enshrining of the right to bear arms in the Constitution. Seems all Americans pick and choose what parts of the Constitution they deem important. Even "We, the people ..." fails when some are not classified as 'people'.

Russia's ended a long time ago; they just don't realize it yet. Maybe their first clue should be that any of the conventional forces of the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Sweden, or even Poland could 'mop the floor' with the Russian forces, as evidenced by the criminal war in the Ukraine.

Yugoslavia 1999 was an EU operation; not NATO. And it provided the basis for the EU Armed Forces. See here Defence forces of the European Union - Wikipedia

The IDF. As previously done in Operatio Opera in June 1981, when the French designed Osiris class nuclear reactor was rendered unoperational by an Israeli Air Force strike group of F-16A fighter jets. The IDF now has close to 50 F-35s, making stealthy strikes even more viable in the middle East region. And who would go to war with Israel ? They DO have nuclear weapons.

Stop hiding behind your Constitution to perpetuate all sorts of anti-social behaviour. It is your Constitution that is protecting the rights of demented people to go into schools and shoot up kids. It is a literal and original interpretation of the Constitution that has lead to the overturning of Roe vs Wade. What passed for 'morality' a couple of hundred years ago, such as owning slaves, is no longer valid. Maybe it is time for some changes ...

I bet a lot of Easter Europeans, and especially Ukrainians right now, wish he had gotten his way.