Tesseract

нет Я хочу выучить русского. Try these links: http://superstringtheory.com/ http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html http://www.msnbc.com/news/201650.asp?cp1=1

нет Я хочу выучить русского. Try these links: http://superstringtheory.com/ http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html http://www.msnbc.com/news/201650.asp?cp1=1

Я наклоняю верю этому, я должен объяснить все...standard

Я наклоняю верю этому, я должен объяснить все...standard

Occam's razor.

Occam's razor.

Well its not really a theory at all, because: 1)it should be consistent with pre-existing theory to the extent that the pre-existing theory was experimentally verified, though it will often show pre-existing theory to be wrong in an exact sense, 2)has survived many critical real world tests that could have proven it false 3)makes predictions that might someday be used to disprove the theory 4)is the best known explanation of the infinite variety of alternative explanations for the same data (Occam's Razor)

Well its not really a theory at all, because: 1)it should be consistent with pre-existing theory to the extent that the pre-existing theory was experimentally verified, though it will often show pre-existing theory to be wrong in an exact sense, 2)has survived many critical real world tests that could have proven it false 3)makes predictions that might someday be used to disprove the theory 4)is the best known explanation of the infinite variety of alternative explanations for the same data (Occam's Razor)

Its the most comenly known theory to the general populace and it may turn out to be false.

Its the most comenly known theory to the general populace and it may turn out to be false.

No. Blue: what we see as blue is the visible spectrum between green and indigo' date=' seen by the human observer by radiant energy with wavelengths of about 420 to 490 nanometers. Or one of the [i']psychologica[/i]l primary hues. The answer is no' date=' because: 1)We see blue becasue that is the result of our brains and the light reflecting off the ball. 2)We see (or feel it) being sphereical because of the result of our brains and and the light reflecting off the ball. 3)We cannot measure the way our brain percieves things when our brains can make [i']no more distinction between them[/i].

No. Blue: what we see as blue is the visible spectrum between green and indigo' date=' seen by the human observer by radiant energy with wavelengths of about 420 to 490 nanometers. Or one of the [i']psychologica[/i]l primary hues. The answer is no' date=' because: 1)We see blue becasue that is the result of our brains and the light reflecting off the ball. 2)We see (or feel it) being sphereical because of the result of our brains and and the light reflecting off the ball. 3)We cannot measure the way our brain percieves things when our brains can make [i']no more distinction between them[/i].

Its only grows 20cm long.

Its only grows 20cm long.

yes

Id say twice as powerful as a longbow wielded by a samurai.

Lets see the arrows your using.

Nice.

I depends on how you like your wine.

I suggest you dont use a filter to get rid of the yeast, that makes the wine of less quality and sweet.You should find fining agents (bentonite) or egg whites, much better way to remove the suspended things.

No.How about the first 100 prime numbers.

Why dont we just make a huge metal curtain and eclipse the sun several times, and spell hello in morse code.