Tesseract

Oooooh, good point.I guess he has some problems.

Your right Blike , but It was Bush's idea to go to war not the senates idea.

heres something its a quote: "See, one of the interesting things in the Oval Office — I love to bring people into the Oval Office — right around the corner from here — and say, this is where I office, but I want you to know the office is always bigger than the person." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Jan. 29, 2004

How many posts do you think are left Jerry?

Its not he same thing as telemarketing its done by officials to a small sample of the general public, if someone dosnt want to answer the phone they dont its just a wasted vote. If the president wants something like the war in Iraq he gets it.

If you want a really f****d site about ninjas look at this: http://www.realultimatepower.net/

Seems like a cheap imitation of this site. Especially the name sciforums and this site is science forums.

Im talking about decisions not laws.If the president wants something he ahs it.

I dont think US or Canada should have referendums or polling or votes by ballot, here is a better way, read the passage: "Using Official Public Opinion Surveys, performed by your elected MP and not by private companies, we can find out which of the public policy proposals are approved by the majority of us. For every important public policy (equal access health care improvement, tax cuts, poverty elimination, accessible education, strong justice, more care for seniors and other) an information package about this proposals will be provided to a random panel of 400 voters from the electoral list of Cambridge and North Dumfries and at he end of the week they will receive a phone call from the MP asking them which proposal they support or not. This scientific survey has an accuracy of 95%. If the public opinion from Cambridge and North Dumfries supports one proposal with more than 50%, I am bound to raise my hand in Ottawa accordingly. This is what we call direct access democracy." This is for Cambridge and North Dumfries in Onatrio Canada, but the system is to be used for the whole country. From http://www.wegovern.ca/john_oprea_2004_election_cambridge_ontario_canada.htm

I think the president does the decisions for the country, not the senate or the congress.Even thought they do some of the things.Maybe not as important.

The problem again is how are you going to launch the photon so it hits the mirrors and how to make it a 100% reflective surface?As I sadi the photon would be absorbed in 1-2 bounces.

The ballot systen dosnt work to much money to make them.The ideal way is for the MP (or the US version whatever that is) to do a phoning of a select group to equally distributed ages, and sexes in each town.Look at the links it explains much better than me.

No its not about Bush or the war, Im talkign about democracy, mainly in Canada and the US.There are many other threads for Bush. So your saying you wouldnt rather have a choice in what happens with your country and would just allow a person to make descisions for you because your too lazy?...

I know it works well with other countries but not very well with large ones.Direct Acess Democracy is better for large countries, look at links. More for our tax money as in having important and benificial things come from taxes.Health care (medicare) education, enviromental and ocean related, new energy, wood substitutes, .....things like that.

Please move if in wrong forum. Nowadays democracy is more and more like a monarchy, the head people in office make the decisions for the people that only get to vote, every four years (I think its the same in UK).Well that is represenatative government, and that is the definition, but dont you think people deserve more for their tax money, I sure do.The best democracy is in Sweden (I think its Sweden) they have a direct democracy system, where the people have mass referendums to decide policy and laws.There are some other ways for better functioning Democracy, what are your opinions. Here are some sources: http://www.wegovern.ca this is for canadian democracy (a direct access democracy site) http://www.directaccessdemocracy.org About Direct Access Democracy http://www.npsnet.com/cdd/ ....direct democracy in Canada

LOL, now its funny.

It dosnt matter what the beam splitter is the problem is that it cant separate a single photon from the source.Thus the experiment is impossible.

Its not about the curvature of the mirror its about the curvature of the surface of the mirror (there isnt a perfectly flat mirror) .Besides there is not 100% reflective surface in existense the photon would be absorbed on the second or third bounce...

I dont get this at all can someone explain it please.

This is the new thread about photons.

There are two reasons why the experiment in this thread is impossible: 1)Statistiaclly its impossible to measure out or have one photon, you can never do it even wiht a beam splitter you would have less and less accuracy as the amount of photons became less, it would be unmeasureable. 2)You could never make a 100% secure device (for the experiment) that didnt let in any radiation or particles or light from the outside and you could never have a 100% flat mirror that would reflect the photons exactly back because the photons are smaller that the atoms in the mirror.Also you couldnt have a device to constantly see the photon in the chamber everytime it would hit something (its moving always at light speed) it would lose energy until it disappears. So how would you do it?

Could someone please move my posts from the other thread in classical mechanics to here please. And please move if in wrong forum. So anyone have anything to say about photons?