Tesseract

Being able to predict long term effects and find patterns in random sets , is called chaos theory. It also says that there can be completely random events from normal equations.Given the theory to be true, it would provide support both for predicting the future and not being able to do it.

Also its not even Lepiota, heres what that looks like: http://www.mykoweb.com/CAF/species/Lepiota_magnispora.html

The mushroom in question ,isnt amanita panterina heres a picture of what that looks like. http://www.setasandalucia.com/amanitapanterina.html

You should patent this, before someone else thinks of it. Anyway you could build the light projecting device right into the reflective surface you you wouldnt need and hole.

Theres a much better chance that theres lifeforms, than there are intelligent lifeforms.A few trillion light years away there could be an amoeba somewhere...

Well, I dont know maybe she invented the name leukemia...? lol

The problem with the Darke equation is that all the variables are predicted.

Hmm, N = N* fp ne fl fi fc fL http://www.activemind.com/Mysterious/Topics/SETI/drake_equation.html Your right.But still small chances.I saw this once before,but never examined it.

She invented leukemia...?Who would want to do that?

Theres a possibility,but even if they existed it wouldnt nessecerily be as advanced as us.They might not exist anymore, maybe destroyed themselves.Comparing the incredibally small time humans have lived in history of the universe.It wouldnt really be surprising if we were to early or to late.

Okay Ill try but I cant promise anything.I dont know its kinda hard to be perfect.

Ok...all I said is that there arent many people on the math forum, thats it.I think that was a little to harsh.

Hmm I liked your last avatar more.I only posted two anyway, and they kind of make sense, and are related to the post.Anyway Ill stop.

I thought spam means:Unsolicited e-mail, often of a commercial nature, sent indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists, individuals, or newsgroups; junk e-mail. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=spam

He, he, he wouldnt that be funny.I only did two anyway.

They dont, but there arent many people on the math forum strangely.

No I was just writing things as to get more posts in , to make me a Baryon.Thats over 100 posts so I needed some more...

You would need Vast...amounts of storage space to harvest a universe.

Who would spend so much time needed as to create an elaborate illusion like he did?

I dont like this thread anymore, read my other ones people, paradoxes, genomes,chaos theory...

I think if it were easy to make a universe someone would have done it by now .

What, I don't not...? You learn English speak should. Just joking it makes sense...

No one has anything to say about 4d shapes...hmm.

Wow amazing thread.

We know that our universes isnt finite,so its either infinite or expanding.If it were infinite you could never harvest all of it, and if it were expanding the robots would have to expand with it and they could never do that.Remember Zenos paradox, as soon as the robots (assuming they could travel as fast as the universe) would arrive were the universe was expanding it would expand farther. If the universe was finite (strangely) it could be possible, yet very difficult.