Tesseract

*Beware not only can they affect your brain they can explode* http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041123/ap_on_hi_te/exploding_phones

Science of mind is what brings that which cannot be named, because structure hinders the studier from comprehending the mind in it's true state, as opposed to a bag of satsumas.5 kilos and assorted nuts and bolts which only hinders Anna Kournikova from showing her true fiendish, but perfectly shaped flask containing Ethyl Alcohol. Therefore, the only reason Weetabix lacks a certain resonance is because MUTANT TUNA FISH have taken over ScienceForums the natural mating habits of the admins breakfast cerial(s) are directly proportional to American PI. Now the evidence of this radical statement : fafalone the great is a Cerial Killer, and YT will now be castrated for spelling serial wrong. But what NavajoEverclear doesn't know is that the plan to kill his cerial takes precedence over this never-ending paragraph.And thus, we have the unfortunate situation of cerial dying horrible death alongside the Marsha Clark groupies, inside of your own kitchen. Besides if the aliens found out that Michael Jackson and his quest to make all black men look like white women was going to be sucessful, they'd probably insert anal probes into our brains. Muffins do not feel good when put up FOR ME TO POOP ON!! Though upon further analysis blueberry cellular phones, strawberry pop tarts and a side dish of shit on a shingle therefore we come to the conclusion that, while covered in bleu cheese, monkeys dance however, also significant is the number of clingons on the starboard bow as apposed to the tesseract

Mines quite empty. Thats my katana.

Science of mind is what brings that which cannot be named, because structure hinders the studier from comprehending the mind in it's true state, as opposed to a bag of satsumas.5 kilos and assorted nuts and bolts which only hinders Anna Kournikova from showing her true fiendish, but perfectly shaped flask containing Ethyl Alcohol. Therefore, the only reason Weetabix lacks a certain resonance is because MUTANT TUNA FISH have taken over ScienceForums the natural mating habits of the admins breakfast cerial(s) are directly proportional to American PI. Now the evidence of this radical statement : fafalone the great is a Cerial Killer, and YT will now be castrated for spelling serial wrong. But what NavajoEverclear doesn't know is that the plan to kill his cerial takes precedence over this never-ending paragraph.And thus, we have the unfortunate situation of cerial dying horrible death alongside the Marsha Clark groupies, inside of your own kitchen. Besides if the aliens found out that Michael Jackson and his quest to make all black men look like white women was going to be sucessful, they'd probably insert anal probes into our brains. Muffins do not feel good when put up FOR ME TO POOP ON!! Though upon further analysis blueberry cellular phones, strawberry pop tarts

Science of mind is what brings that which cannot be named, because structure hinders the studier from comprehending the mind in it's true state, as opposed to a bag of satsumas.5 kilos and assorted nuts and bolts which only hinders Anna Kournikova from showing her true fiendish, but perfectly shaped flask containing Ethyl Alcohol. Therefore, the only reason Weetabix lacks a certain resonance is because MUTANT TUNA FISH have taken over ScienceForums the natural mating habits of the admins breakfast cerial(s) are directly proportional to American PI. Now the evidence of this radical statement : fafalone the great is a Cerial Killer, and YT will now be castrated for spelling serial wrong. But what NavajoEverclear doesn't know is that the plan to kill his cerial takes precedence over this never-ending paragraph.And thus, we have the unfortunate situation of cerial dying horrible death alongside the

Not very?

The funny thing is, that this is the kind of question that zen buddhists spend weeks thinking only of this to achieve enlightenment.

Why what did you think???

I put forth an argument , just nobody agrees with that one. You cant really get an answer without being objective though.

You can't define more thats why this is a false problem. Its both equally blue and equally spherical. The only wat to solve it would be to add to the question.

You seem a little off today...its strange

Are you feeling ok?

1)It matters, because he may not see it as blue. 2)We dont know the exact shade of blue. 3)He will see blue but he may not know this. We assume that. look at this example, these are just a few of the possible colours the ball could be can you tell which is blue and which isnt? If you didnt know the question would you know?

Anyone have a really good processor? Or a better question what kind of processor do you have?

Anyone have a really good processor? Or a better question what kind of processor do you have?

You mean perfectly a sphere becasue spherical means: 1. Having the shape of a sphere; globular. 2. Having a shape approximating that of a sphere. 3. Of or relating to a sphere. And sphere means: 1. Mathematics A three-dimensional surface, all points of which are equidistant from a fixed point. The ball is not a sphere but it is spherical, and since spherical only needs to be defined and relating to or having the shape of a sphere the ball cannot be considered less spherical. Weather its a perfect sphere or not is not in the question thus we cant use it to answer it. Unless the observer has a visual problem they would say it was spherical, not a spheroid or a sphere so we must leave that part of the problem. Now about blueness, anywhere from 420-490nm is blue, that means all the wavelengths between those nm is blue. Now we have an observer. One . We do not know the exact hue or shade of blue. So we must compare them seperatly. Now in statistics you take the difference between the numbers and divide it by the smallest possible number to give the statistical uncertainty (The estimated amount or percentage by which an observed or calculated value may differ from the true value.)Which as I said before is 16.66%. Now we have one observer observing each wavelength of blue between 420-490 (becasue we dont know which it is). There is almost 17% that the observer will say that the colour is not blue. Because we dont know the colour of the ball exactly we cant say he is wrong. So in those 17% the ball is more spherical than blue, because the observer will say that it isnt blue but it is spherical. In the other 84% he would say the ball is blue and is spherical, so in those casses we cant compare those things under normal conditions. But if we change the conditions we change the question. Now I think thats right.

You mean perfectly a sphere becasue spherical means: 1. Having the shape of a sphere; globular. 2. Having a shape approximating that of a sphere. 3. Of or relating to a sphere. And sphere means: 1. Mathematics A three-dimensional surface, all points of which are equidistant from a fixed point. The ball is not a sphere but it is spherical, and since spherical only needs to be defined and relating to or having the shape of a sphere the ball cannot be considered less spherical. Weather its a perfect sphere or not is not in the question thus we cant use it to answer it. Unless the observer has a visual problem they would say it was spherical, not a spheroid or a sphere so we must leave that part of the problem. Now about blueness, anywhere from 420-490nm is blue, that means all the wavelengths between those nm is blue. Now we have an observer. One . We do not know the exact hue or shade of blue. So we must compare them seperatly. Now in statistics you take the difference between the numbers and divide it by the smallest possible number to give the statistical uncertainty (The estimated amount or percentage by which an observed or calculated value may differ from the true value.)Which as I said before is 16.66%. Now we have one observer observing each wavelength of blue between 420-490 (becasue we dont know which it is). There is almost 17% that the observer will say that the colour is not blue. Because we dont know the colour of the ball exactly we cant say he is wrong. So in those 17% the ball is more spherical than blue, because the observer will say that it isnt blue but it is spherical. In the other 84% he would say the ball is blue and is spherical, so in those casses we cant compare those things under normal conditions. But if we change the conditions we change the question. Now I think thats right.

Wow look at that.

Wow look at that.

continuation:

continuation:

Top ten best sports pics (first 5):

Top ten best sports pics (first 5):

So compressed the atoms would fuse.