budullewraagh

on the contrary, a horde of people checked his facts before the film was released and it turns out that he had them all correct. cite your source, please. he did plenty of opium and god knows what else in college. opium is highly addictive. -> he is was/is a drug addict. criminal? how about the hundreds of thousands of innocents he has slain? he is therefore guilty of that much MANSLAUGHTER. how about defying the constitution with laws? TREASON! good call. i'll second that. i'll also second the second half of sayo's post.

i'll answer that. every citizen is given the same rights as every other citizen (under the constitution). otherwise it's called discrimination. it is irrelevant. if they want it, they should be entitled to having it because we need equal rights for all.

nice try. i read everything. don't pretend to be innocent. you just proved nothing in that post. you stated your opinion and did not justify it. i requested for you to justify it. you failed to do so. you wrote a response that stated nothing. that is hypocritical. i'd even call it spam.

not in israel. not necessarily always in iraq either. to iraqis this isn't relevant; their media states that the targeted houses were not at all military targets. also i would like to add that the people fighting in iraq are 99% not terrorists. they are 99% resistance fighters who want their country back. a great reason why some arab countries hate us is because of our neo-liberal economic policy as well as our neo-conservative political policy. that's not what i was saying. i was saying that they do not represent islam and thus they are quasi-muslim. no; he sat around doing nothing for 7 minutes. his cronies "defended" our country. actually they mostly wasted our surplus and made the world hate us more while creating more terrorists than they eliminated. 1. instead of looking dumbfounded, he could have looked concerned. 2. he could have stood up and told the class that he had urgent affairs he had to attend to and that he was truely sorry but he had to leave. naaaw, you don't say? you asked me to cite a source and i did. now you won't? how many times have you said or implied this? funny thing is you keep coming back. i have even more relevant things to say. if you stop insulting me, i may even gain some respect for you. at the moment i'm sitting here looking up screaming "mods, where are you now?" well, apparently i was absent-minded while watching moore's film. i am truely sorry. i do not feel like pirating the film now, nor do i feel like going to theatres now, so could you please substantiate your thought and share with me your analytical literary genius?

it doesn't explode. i've seen it react with water. i've seen it react with air. it just tarnishes instantly on contact with air. no flames or explosions.

so i can oxidize the cesium and cry for days?

nah i was thinking of a stainless steel pole with the cesium at the end so i wouldn't blow myself up

har har i'd definately go for a conc acid over water. the reaction with my supersaturated HCl would be so explosive that it would probably kill me if i added as little as 1g of it. i'd need a 20 foot pole!

lolly roffles. LiAlH4 too:)

yeah but the problem is that unless you make it into nanopowder it won't be so cool. and even then, cesium will provide for a better reaction.

could fluorinate the antimony and use lithium replacement to recover cesium.

blike, that was incredible. on another note, i am from new york and i call the sport "football" or "footy". i call the game involving throwing pigskins and tackling people "american football". but hey, that's just me.

what solution is acidic only some of the time, despite being exposed to the same constant conditions? periodic acid which element is anti-capitalist? antimony wow, i can't believe i spent 5 minutes trying to think of some. i have shamed myself as well as my family

perhaps. i'm thinking about taking some of that antimony trioxide and cesium chloride...

well, just a notice. those are some crazy low prices.

just for all you hardcore chemists out there, i advise you to go here: https://www.storesonline.com/site/579340/page/253679 things are being sold at as low as 10%!

he should be more clear. gender and race divide the superclass "homo sapien". despite the fact that there are a set number of genders and races, one cannot put numerical values on the degree of which they divide because it is very much opinionated. i said this before and thought it was made clear. my regrets if it was not.

i did contribute something. you read it. apparently you believe gender to be a greater dividing gap than race. the two are not comparable to me, for example, but are comparable to you. it is opinionated. if a nation does not give equal rights to all, that nation discriminates and does not recognize everybody to be equal under the law. more importantly, STOP THE FLAMING!

it is a fact. if you consider the president not taking action to defend his country to be insignificant i highly question your support of your country. so you don't agree with the video footage taken at the time? sorry, but those eyes of yours show you things you don't want to see sometimes; it happens. care to cite a source or two? augh, not theodore roosevelt! he thought war was glorious until his son got killed in the first world war. from that day on he lived a life of sorrow. do you believe it was done effectively? do you not believe that we are supporting terrorism with every civilian we kill? the vicious cycle continues: 1.us blows up house. 2.household on streets starving, will die if not helped. 3.terrorist/resistance group approaches family, offers food, shelter, education for children if the patriarch fights for them. 4.children taught to hate the west through education and real life when their father dies. careful; fundamentalist islam is not violent. these people are called "quasi-muslims". the kkk isn't protestant; they're "quasi-protestant". please be careful not to stereotype by saying "they". rather, could you please use words to the effect of "some"? good call.

that's left open to one's opinion. it isn't fact. not if they aren't allowed to marry. if they aren't allowed to marry, the constitution is not being upheld. but then again, with ashcroft, who cares about the constitution?

ok, let me take a random example. do you not believe that bush sat around for 7 minutes or so after hearing of the attacks on new york? if you believe this is fact, you are contradicting yourself. if you believe this is fiction, you disagree with a great number of researchers, and more importantly, unedited video footage (not from moore's film but from the live coverage). also, could you give some examples of moore "placing event B before event A in his movies to create the impression that B caused A (....)."?

legally there is nothing you can do, though. on a side note, since men are allowed to be shirtless in public, there is no law against women being shirtless in public. of course, there is quite a difference. but then again, there is no way to discriminate.

i was referring more to civil rights issues and such. age of revolutions, anyone?

google (or better yet, vivisimo) "valence shell electron repulsion theory"

let it be known that people were hired to check the facts to prevent right wing crooks from calling the film fictional. they found nothing wrong.