Jump to content

budullewraagh

Senior Members
  • Posts

    3080
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by budullewraagh

  1. not just sodium persulphate, but certainly quite a bit of kinetic energy
  2. i'd like to see what that would do with a little peroxymonosulfuric acid Ca+2 to Ca is 2.84 CaO(hyd) to Ca is -2.189 so i suppose you could do the CaO(hyd) to Ca if you really wanted to.
  3. Na won't replace K K+ to K -2.924 E^0/V Na+ to Na -2.713 E^0/V
  4. yeah but i dont have a blowtorch or a bunsen burner
  5. i need to get some high temperatures, so hey, why not use a magnifying glass? think this could possibly work?
  6. nope, theyre not at all soluble in the motor oil, but supposedly they do work. i've heard reports of people doing it and obtaining a metal that burns purple(k). they also do it in molten state in an inert atmosphere or in aqueous solution, although you get the hydroxide when aqueous. if i had a K source i'd do it myself, but unfortunately i can't obtain the nitrate or even the chloride around here.
  7. you wont make the hydroxide if you use motor oil, whose Ka is almost noneistent right?
  8. told ya so so, i dont suppose you're going to be doing lithium replacement by the kilo soon?
  9. no, no, no. ever heard of sigma and pi bonds? hybrid orbitals? the electrons are shared between the atoms.
  10. of course it is the united states that caused this. it's not "reinstating" but rather it's "instating"
  11. eh, they didn't start becoming imperialistic when they noticed their need for imperialism; they were imperialistic hundreds of years prior. they realized they needed to become stronger when the mongols knocked on their doors. i can remember that in 1591 the korean admiral yi sun shin completely dominated the japanese navy after years of japanese imperial raids that left countless innocent chinese and koreans dead. of course, when commodore matthew perry came, the japanese became involved in the global economy, but this was not the true reason for japanese imperialism
  12. don't you mean Na2CO3 rather than NaCO3?
  13. there are better propellants. these days FNO3 and C(NO2)4 are used as rocket fuel.
  14. yes, i do believe that. come on yt, in all your studies you've never heard of reduction potentials?
  15. aww but that's just sublimation generating much pressure; nothing cool
  16. oh, i agree that the rape of nanking and the bataan death march was much worse than the whole sherman carpet thing. hey, if youre looking for atrocities think of the tens of millions of innocent chinese the japanese killed during imperialistic days.
  17. actually, strontium can displace sodium according to the reduction potentials...
  18. what kind of dry battery? i open up AAs and find MnO2 and carbon black
  19. my definition of bonding is the share of electrons between two atoms that releases energy upon formation and invests potential energy and is determined by the atomic radii and protons of these two atoms. purely ionic "bonding" doesn't exist. in a water molecule, 118.0 + or - 0.2 is the DOO measurement. this is actually a considerable amount of energy comparatively speaking. the covalent radius of O-2 is 1.40, of O- it is 1.76, of O+ it is 0.22, of H- it is 2.08, and of H+ it is 10^-5
  20. try using Mg and Sr. the former you can get from the cases of pencil sharpeners. the latter you can get from highway flares.
  21. no; if you want the reaction to work perfectly, you'd need to measure out a certain amount of KCl, then multiply the mass of the KCl by 0.8771291188 to determine how much NaNO3 you need to use. by the way, what do you wish to do with this KNO3?
  22. well, we can do this stoichiometrically: MW of NaNO3=84.99467 MW of KCl=74.5513 so, take any measurement of your KCl and multiply by 0.8771291188 and you will have your required amount of NaNO3.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.