-
Posts
3080 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by budullewraagh
-
it takes very little to set that off. i know that the dynamite form of nitroglycerin produces 270,000 ATM of pressure in 1 millionth of a seond. scary stuff. it's not all that ironic though. the NG yields NO which dialates the blood vessels
-
a low percent do have you read das kapital? it's quite a fascinating look into capitalism and where it fails. it proposes socialistic values; some of which we use today in the united states. i believe that when a soldier pledges his life to defend his country that he should not be misled into fighting for the economic gains of a select few. THAT is the problem we have.
-
just to clarify my point (since you missed it)... i find it to be sad that the have-nots are the ones who pay in cash and in blood for the benefits of the haves. this is exactly what marx warned of
-
you should find them. ???????? free will is impossible to take. identify that country and substantiate your post, if you please nope, you aren't. you drew a conclusion that was not implied.
-
yes, it dehydrates and blocks a hormone that induces sleep
-
i did not say i know more than he does. i said that i have seen things that he most like has not. i also realize that he has seen things that i have not. isn't it a shame that our soldiers have to be pawns? when they are recruited, surely they are never told of the atrocities many are expected to commit. surely they are not told of the horrors of war. a great number of soldiers disagree with the cause; have you seen the statistics on how few people are re-enlisting? how about the suicide rate? according to their job specifications, it may not be the "place" of soldiers to question their commanding officers, but that does not mean they have lost the natural state of free will. if i were there i would be outraged. i definately would leave. there is no way that i would ever let myself be used by the government for the economic gains of a few individuals.
-
there is a physics principle that states that at absolute zero (a completely impossible temperature to achieve since you cannot divide by zero AND it is impossible to cool something without touching it with matter) electrons would still move. of course, this only speculates. speaking of speculation, as for a highest possible temperature, i believe that there is one, but it is almost infinately high. there is a certain finite amount of energy in existence currently. there is a certain finite amount of matter in existence currently. IF all of creation were to continuously undergo nuclear reactions and yield energy converted from mass, there would be a finite amount of energy. of course, this would be an inconceivable amount of energy, but hey, it makes sense.
-
there certainly are other stories. i respect jglerica's view, but i do not believe he represents the united states military. the images i have seen are enough to disturb me and i do not even have to be there. i pity our soldiers; they are being used as pawns. unfortunately, the lower and middle classes must always be the ones who suffer for the advancement of the corrupt "elite"
-
makes sense; he couldn't be tried in us courts. think of it; what charges could we bring up?
-
actually, on second thought, i have two: botulinum toxin A (1 million times more toxic than dioxin, the most toxic chemical humans have ever synthesized) also neptunium-234 that stuff releases more energy in gamma rays than anything i've ever heard of. plus, its half-life is 4.4 days
-
in the 1980s nokia started making li rechargable batteries
-
i am considering it. problem is that lithium batteries are so expensive. how much lithium can i obtain from one AA battery? how about an old rechargable cell phone battery that no longer works?
-
this wasn't from online; this was in non-fictional books! i'm sorry if you think i'm accusing you of lying. i certainly do not intend to say so. in fact, i have a great deal of respect for you. problem is that school is out and i can't contact any of my chem teachers.
-
the "us" i refer to is the world actually. and yes, it is incentive to offer food, shelter, education etc to families who are basically the walking dead. seriously, they can't last without these and so, realizing this, al-qaida recruits. unfortunately, the united states is doing little to nothing to help this situation
-
ok, calm down. how can you say that all the sources i provided are incorrect? they are all valid, professional sources. again, i urge the lot of you to search online for "activity series of metals". tell me what you find; i found many sources supporting my thesis but never one stating that K is more active than Li can you explain how people have reacted KNO3 and Li and obtained LiNO3 and K? this is actually true; they tested the K in H2O and noticed the purple/lilac flame and it was a much more vigorous reaction than lithium could ever produce.
-
A simple homemade Atomic Reactor
budullewraagh replied to YT2095's topic in Modern and Theoretical Physics
ack, i said am-241 was a beta source??? bah! i meant alpha. i know alphas knock neutrons out of be. -
A simple homemade Atomic Reactor
budullewraagh replied to YT2095's topic in Modern and Theoretical Physics
yes. a bit disturbing too -
oh, since we piss them off so much, i could imagine that this will spawn terrorists and their supporters. think of it; the are al-qaida operatives recruiting now. they offer food, shelter, education as well as many other benefits. of course, the patriarch of each family they recruit for their forces. quite simple. it's terrible what this administration has done to us
-
if you like chem, read napoleon's buttons. interesting stuff, there
-
think of it; the e- of the Cl- are more attracted to the lithium nucleus because they can get closer to it. take a magnet and put it near a piece of iron. then take a more powerful magnet but put it twice as far away from the piece of iron. which attracts more? the weaker magnet that is closer to the piece of iron
-
despite all those qualified sources who state otherwise?
-
sheesh they are different in britain:\ heres a definition of activity: "the characteristic of acting chemically or of promoting a chemical reaction"
-
wrong word. i said Li is more ACTIVE than K
-
i think they have it wrong in england:\