budullewraagh

thats exactly what i was impling. i really dont know why. anybody else have input?

right on, mokele. it's just human behavior. we see this sort of thing with animals on the discovery channel, so what's so bad about the same sort of thing with humans? granted, we have more fun and all, but it still is a biological process. and porn can be very educational

im just saying that it's hygroscopic and deliquescent to the point where if there is ANY water in the atmosphere, the KOH will absorb it.

KOH is deliquescent, mind you, and not fun to get on you. if you have KOH, chances are it is at least slightly hydrated, unless you keep it closely mixed with, say, magnesium perchlorate. in other news, i have a nice burn on my arm from a drop of saturated KOH.

you should define "discipline." "Child abuse is the process of disciplining but only for those who need it." so are you saying that disciplining those who do not need discipline is not child abuse? i think child abuse is unnecessary in every case. who are these "illed" you speak of?

"adding HNO3 in HCl would lower its pH value/?" it depends on the concentrations

the cupric cation is a very weak cation compared to the kallium cation. check reduction potentials.

check the dissociation constants

tell us what you are thinking, show that you are putting effort, etc, then we'll help you

considering the fact that you didn't actually post statistics, i find your above statement to be anything but convincing

phi, you are a genius. frankly, i dont really care; the sites that link to porn tend to be the sites that are questionable in the first place. you cant censor the internet, so theres little one or many can do about this. frankly i dont care because humans do indeed partake in sexual activity. i find sexuality to be beautiful and not to be shunned, but hey, that's just me.

i was replying to hoho's post

oh btw ed, have you ever seen HF+Rb react?

stop by some day; i'll take it.

yes, other countries allow for child abuse to a certain extent. that is irrelevant. child abuse is not good for the child or anybody. again, discipline inhibits the mind, which is problematic with admissions officers (see previous post)

"1.Bud, the only possible pro for child abuse is discpline (unless if you can find another one)" but once again i ask, how is submission beneficial to a child? "2. what's wrong with preaching? It looks cliche and I guess that's your hate it" you're mad. i dont want to hear you telling me what to do and what not to do in such a manner. "4. I never used extreme cases " hitting people? that's quite extreme "5. Obviously, unless you think I'm an illed person, communication should come before hitting." explain this 6. I don't understand what you're talking about what are you responding to? 7. admission system, please explain what admission system is." college admissions. you know, you apply to colleges and they ultimately accept or reject you. top colleges pay close attention to character and personality. they want interesting individuals to enhance the atmosphere of the campus, not mindless drones.

do you have any reasonable response to my above post (#49)? before we continue to talk about child abuse in various other nations, i would like to hear what you have to say in response to post #49.

"1. you will get in trouble 2. I'm talking about parent and child abuse. 3. children are fools until they can defend themselves (as I have said, not being rude to your parent)" screw trouble; if people want to show their dissent, let them do so. once again, don't preach. no, you aren't talking about parent abuse; you never mentioned that before. define defense. oh, and define fool. really, this is an incredibly ignorant approach. "Well, if you know your parent well enough and think that it's a possiblity, then you should be a personal slave (that means giving up your dignity? then yes)" STOP PREACHING. do we need a restraining order? it is the duty of parents to raise their children to prepare them for life outside of the confines of their homes. children should not learn to be submissive drones; that's how capitalism and facism ruins populations. "make some sense. Violence is not deterred. Those laws are there to use it in court." learn english. there are laws against child abuse, mind you "I didn't see any criticism, i just saw a statement." it was a statement of criticism "I don't see any relevence. Please be more realistic so that I can understand better. (bud's)" if you use such extreme examples, i can give my own extremes. "If you use your imagination, you can find what the pro for abusing a child might be Douglas. And second, if i used the word discipline, it's not as exciting." why dont you enlighten me? im curious as to how abusing a child may be beneficial to anyone. "I think I'll discipline them enough that they will be able to see the boundaries and to get them into the college/university they want to get in." you have no idea how the admissions system works "e.g. steals chocolate bar (should be prohibited before) -hit their hands with wooden stick 5 times" that just pisses them off and makes them beat up the kid down the street. it doesn't teach them why what they are doing is wrong. if they wish, they will continue to steal whatever they wish to steal, learning more evasive tactics. when they get older, they won't have to worry about being hit by their parents. hitting them doesnt teach them a blasted thing about how what they were doing is wrong. you need to tell a child why they are wrong, not just that they are wrong. ever read fight club? that's what certain philosophy can do to you. you obviously haven't the faintest clue about human psychology. i suggest you take a class or read a book on human psychology and reconsider your viewpoints

"You're right about everything. But parent knows what's good for you. Now if you don't agree, it's smart not to change their minds if you know they won't agree with you. If you think you might, why not try in a different time?" dont preach to me. i am an agreeable kid; i dont protest certain unfound restrictions that are placed upon me. however, if my parents told me to jump off a cliff, then actually brought me to a cliff and brought me to the edge, i'd probably smack them up. any parent that refuses to understand their faults is not only overly arrogant, but also dangerous to their children. even if i were in such a situation, they would hear my dissent if it were called for.

bettina, it's ok if you have opinions; state them if you wish, just heed phi's advice. hoho, you must be mad. consider the benefits and disadvantages of abuse. are parents always right? are children always wrong when they oppose their parents in opinion?

children arent fools. children are usually not as wise as adults. not all adults are as mature as their children. submission is overrated, btw

child abuse should not be allowed in any way. children should obey their parents when they are in the "right". children should disobey when their parents are in the "wrong". this distinction is difficult to make sometimes, as children usually do not have superior judgment. children do not owe everything to their parents.

i heard that red mercury is Hg2Sb2O7 as well, but that doesnt mean it is actually what the soviets used. we may never know; it may not even have mercury in it

oh ethanoic acid isnt all that corrosive at any concentration:\ Na+Cl2 is a fun reaction, but i prefer rP or wP and Br2

http://dli.ernet.in also, depending on what topics you want specific knowledge on, i can hook you up with files; i have a small digital library saved to my hard drive