no dont you worry about it. i have nothing against people posting pics. i was just asking people to be mature about it. really, if you drool all over your monitor, i really dont want to hear about it. compliment people in a tasteful manner.
and really, males, get a girl offline:\
i did and im quite pleased with her
the word isnt "reactive" it's "active". the more active metals will be more apt to give up electrons, while the more active nonmetals will be more apt to gain electrons.
activity depends on reduction potentials. reduction potentials are based on many factors including effective nuclear charge, atomic radius, etc
reactivity is based on reaction rates. yes, cesium reacts with air and water much faster than lithium. reactivity, however, is not what we are speaking of. rather, we are speaking of activity.
we were speaking of activity, not reactivity. the two are totally different terms. activity based on reduction potentials. a more active metal will replace a less active metal.
ex:
Li+KNO3->LiNO3+K
also, other reactions occur based on activity. examples:
H2SO4+KMnO4->HMnO4+K2SO4
KI+Cl2->KCl+I2
sorry but you are 100% wrong. did you not read my post on reduction potentials???
i will write them out again:
Li+ to Li: -3.040 E^(theta)/V
Rb+ to Rb: -2.924
K+ to K: -2.924
Cs+ to Cs: -2.923
Na+ to Na: -2.713
THAT is your group 1 activity series.
Group 2 activity series and reduction potentials:
Ra+2 to Ra: -2.916
Ba+2 to Ba: -2.92
Sr+2 to Sr: -2.89
Ca+2 to Ca: -2.84
Mg+2 to Mg: -2.054
Be+2 to Be: -1.97
Au+ to Au: 1.83
Pt+2 to Pt: 1.188
Ag+ to Ag: 0.7991
i will say that i enjoy my unitednuclear stuff. not particularly cheap tho.
actually, i have a great way to fix that; i found a bunch of people that are giving away grants. apparently i should be able to get $5k if i try hard at all :):)
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.