fattyjwoods

The moon does not rise. It stays in the sky unlike the sun. eg in a clear day with no clouds you can faintly see the moon providing its before noon but then it just dissapears

also im not a expert in this field, but if you do not trust the doctors-who do you trust? Ask them to listen to what the doctors say and ask them what they think. Substance use The relationship between schizophrenia and drug use is complex, meaning that a clear causal connection between drug use and schizophrenia has been difficult to tease apart. There is strong evidence that using certain drugs can trigger either the onset or relapse of schizophrenia in some people. It may also be the case, however, that people with schizophrenia use drugs to overcome negative feelings associated with both the commonly prescribed antipsychotic medication and the condition itself, where negative emotion, paranoia and anhedonia are all considered to be core features.[68] Amphetamines trigger the release of dopamine and excessive dopamine function is believed to be responsible for many symptoms of schizophrenia (known as the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia), amphetamines may worsen schizophrenia symptoms.[69] Schizophrenia can be triggered by heavy use of hallucinogenic or stimulant drugs.[70] There is evidence that suggests that cannabis use can contribute to schizophrenia i know wiki might not be right but dozens cant be wrong http://www.cannabis.net/cannschiz.html http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4486548.stm http://psychcentral.com/lib/2006/cannabis-is-linked-to-schizophrenia-in-predisposed-individuals/ more:http://www.google.co.nz/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=Schizophrenia+cannabis&spell=1 all I can say if to try and block out the voices and tell yourself its nothing and that you will overcome them and stay strong.

So are you trying to say all those "hypothesis" is wrong? Are you also trying to say wikipedia is wrong? and also thousands of other scientists that believe in this "hypothesis"? i agree with you with the "middle part" there is no middle but theres a singularity. Sure you cannot reach it alive but there sure is such a thing!

well then, whats this http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/NumRel/BlackHoleAnat.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity While general relativity describes a black hole as a region of empty space with a pointlike singularity at the center and an event horizon at the outer edge, the theres a lot more evidence you know http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/blackhole/blackhole.html so are you saying all this is fake http://www.geocities.com/autotheist/Physics/bh.htm oh i nearly forgot the great site inow gave http://cosmology.berkeley.edu/Education/BHfaq.html#q3 check this one out ive found my evidence, wheres yours?

science considts of facts expirements methods carrying out stuff and hands on stuff

mmm yep. but its annoying of course an they arent paied so its just volunteer work

This is a great porn site. no pics though-*sigh* well maybe if you tried a bit and maybe well help. by the way this is help for home work not answers for homework.

well dosent the gravitational thingy pull you in? well sooner or later ahaaa! so there is a singualarty. man itll be so cool to fall into one of those things

will that really help, im not questioning the research but isnt that really just rubbing it in and making things worse? i mean looking at porn would make you want to do it wouldnt it? not saying i had past experience though........

go calbiterol !! I agree with you but really this is turning into a alleycat brawl

yea good idea, change it. but the bad thing about wiki is that some young kid would turn up and screw the artical from head to toe.

alright i didnt write the bit about the singularity. Its the evidence that hundredes of scientists came up with. Then what happens if you get sucked in. do u get crushed? there has to be a inside because what happens if you go inside it? i don get this

i know this questions might have been answered before but i would like to know if there is a possible way to travel back to the past or to the future. Ive read some sites and they do talk about time travel and some of them say, yes its possible. If it is possible it will break some laws of science. Some ideas involve entering black holes, which will proba kill you. "If such a black hole formed out of a lump of non-rotating material, it would simply sit in space, swallowing up anything that came near it. At the heart of such a black hole there is a point known as a singularity, where space and time cease to exist, and matter is crushed to infinite density. Thirty years ago, Roger Penrose (now of Oxford University) proved that anything which falls into such a black hole must be drawn into the singularity by its gravitational pull, and also crushed out of existence. But, also in the 1960s, the New Zealand mathematician Roy Kerr found that things are different if the black hole is rotating. A singularity still forms, but in the form of a ring, like the mint with a hole. In principle, it would be possible to dive into such a black hole and through the ring, to emerge in another place and another time. This "Kerr solution" was the first mathematical example of a time machine, but at the time nobody took it seriously. At the time, hardly anybody took the idea of black holes seriously, and interest in the Kerr solution only really developed in the 1970s, after astronmers discovered what seem to be real black holes, both in our own Milky Way Galaxy and in the hearts of other galaxies." http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/John_Gribbin/timetrav.htm Is this true? And if it is how will you get back if theres nothing there. I know it sounds corny but after watching movies like back to the future Im beginning to think it can be true after all. Yes, i kno there probably wont be huge time machines that teleport u but how about black holes.

yeah thats whats going on now. everyones involved. like the whale watching in kaikoura but can you see the japanese go whale watching?

i think that the major countries are making global warming go way faster. Countries like USA, Russia, China are really making a lot of CO2 and stuff like that. You might have heard about how Tony Blair trying to get an agreement out of Bush to lower carbon rates but apart from that nobody seems to care. Bush justs keeeps on rejecting blair's and other enviromental organisations pleas to slow down global warming. do u guys think Bus and Putin and other major carbon producing countries are screwing up our childrens/grandchildrens/great-grandchildren's future. i absoulutely think so

,and also what tatics do you guys think will stop the whaling. As it have been proven harassing the ships arent helping. But it has been proven in years ago that leaving the japanese goverment alone isnt goning to stop them either (just look at the japanese whaling before greenpeace intervened.) If they would just stop because of pride they would have done so before anybody tried to make them stop

So are you saying we (greenpeace) shold sit back and relax and watch the japanese hunt and let them do whatever they want? if the current tatics aren't working-what should we do. as i said eariler if greenpeace stops, the japanese will whale. If greenpeace don't stop the japanese will whale as well. either way they will sooner or later hunt the whales to extiction\. what I think is that greenpeace should ease up the pressure or some goverments should ban whaling in their waters. that would stop them a bit.

Exactly, thanks for your opinion. I 10000000% agree with you, and i also think they are kind of "cukoo" in the head. eating a whale is a bit like eating another guy down the road bull**** (sorry for my language) if the greenpeace eased pressure off the japanese they'll probably hunt them hunt the whales to extinction. I honestly dont think that when greenpeace is trying to save whales it is for their pride. Greenpeace is basically trying to help the whales from becoming extinct problem is, my friend. they are going, sooner or later put a big EXTINCT sign beside the picture of the whale. if they keep there yearly hunts up my geuss is the whales will be gone by 2060, that is hunting the same amount of whales every year. the japanese hunt around 1000 whales a year and they are planning to hunt more http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whaling#Japan_2

what do u mean by plan to fail?

How about the time when the japanese ship Nissan maru broke down or something. greenpeace offered a tow and the japanese rejected it. that was an example of pride wasn't it? but if Greenpeace just lets the Japanese whale, wont that give greenpeace a bad reputtatrion?

I dont care. It's up to the person to decide whether they want to be gay or not

so are you just sayoing it's pride? well if it is pride, they the japanes goverment should really get a life. not trying to offend anyone but this is a really big waste of whales. soon all whales will be extict-then lets see where thier "pride" goes.

Then what are the japanese killing the whalies for? aimless slaughtering? I don't think the japanese will stop the whaling at all just take a look at this site http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/save-our-seas-2/save-the-whales/japanese-whaling http://images.google.co.nz/images?hl=en&q=Japanese%20Whaling%20whale%20meat&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi thay are actually selling the meat in restarunts. They aren't gonna stop. Nothing's gonna stop them Anyway why would greenpeace want to ram them? anyway there for peaceful resoultions

yea i heard about the bit when one of the japanese whaling ships rammed one of the Greenpeace ships

i get all of it