Fuzzwood

There is indeed nothing in these gaps. These are created by the repulsive forces between gaseous molecules.

To be honest, the answer is in your own question.

Then we want to see some effort. This is no homework forum. Hint, assume density is 1 g/ml

Yes

Sorry, I was afk. I had to answer the door for a few Illuminati people. Do you have any idea how absurd your preposition towards all scientists being controlled is? Or is that something YOU would try to do?

That's why they invented a scroll wheel. To scroll down to the end of a wikipage to read and click on the sources and references.

Define good, define evil.

No, I find it a rather handy tool to put emphasis in stuff, for instance when I try to explain organic reaction equations.

Is this an appropriate equation, or did you come up with it?

You need to set up a number line and transform the equation in such a way that the right side is equal to 0. Look for values for x where this is true, and then check if you increase or decrease x to let the equation equal > 0.

Ah you are asking about shear stress here: fluidum between 2 solid surfaces. Am I right? If so, it will not have any significant effect.

I wonder if there is a more subtle way of saying tl;dr (too long; didn't read)

Do you have, as asked for again and again in the supposed spam of your previous threads, have any scientific data to support these claims?

Easy, what does the inverse of a function actually mean? And how does domain relate to range?

There is no soul or anything like that accepted in the scientific world. Your entire concious is based on neurons firing electrical impulses and chemically based links between those neurons. Can you please get to the point you are trying to make? Life is no special thing, it's simply a prolonged mix of chemical reactions.

Sorry, had to pick myself up from the ground there. Can you please tell me what you smoke or use regularily?

Don't confuse ethanol with an hydroxygroup please. I reckon the former is what you understand as being the alcohol we are talking about; it isn't.

Any scientific data to support this hypothesis?

We can't.

This will be a problem as long as they keep bullshit religions in governments.

Noooooo thank you. To be able to join, they'd have to shove their right to bear arms somewhere where the sun doesn't shine. I know that guns don't kill people. People kill people. But the guns do make it a lot easier and also enlarge the chance for the killing to be unintended.

Does google distribute illegal software?

Simple, and this might sound a bit racistic, but I guess it's because they keep clinging a little bit too radically to their book of fairytales and don't see any opportunities besides qapla'ing everybody that doesn't think like them.

There is a "me" tho if you shuffle the letters a bit.

Are arrogance in conjunction with morale also part of religion? You can replace morale easily enough by something like common sense. I think that from that point onwards, you are a better person because you are doing stuff like recycling and being nice to others for yourself and your surroundings instead of having to think about the flying spaghettimonster every time you do something.