Jump to content

DevilSolution

Senior Members
  • Posts

    734
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DevilSolution

  1. Maybe were all schizophrenic versions of god perceiving itself from different perspectives? Perhaps were the combined essence of an angel in exile from heaven for being naughty? Maybe god doesnt exist at all? We're very little.......a spec of gold dust trapped in time. Are you defining god in abrahamic terms? The god a pantheism? A personal god we have no comprehension of? Your best bet is saying god is infinite. You would need to clearly define god for a discussion, if gods entropy equals 0 then its not infinite and we all freeze into a motionless 3 Dimensional space. If the big crunch occurs the universe cycles. Do you imagine there is a great database of experience and knowledge that is god?
  2. I dont understand anything to do with black holes, dark energy or matter but i do have this..... Hope it helps. The timestamp didnt seem to work but skip to 6 min 45 sec for dark energy.
  3. I think energy transforms from one form to another, its defined as the potential to do work.....which takes alot of forms, for example you could release light, heat or electricity....they would all be forms of energy. There are various base units for different forms of matter that equate to energy, mass via breaking protons and neutrons apart in an unstable isotope (super heavy metals are usually very unstable and release radiation by just reacting with the natural atmosphere) are one of the more complex examples of energy ...... from mass. You can much more easily use energy from something like zinc and sodium or potassium for example. I think the standard unit of energy is joules but depending on the the work being done. To make it clear, energy could be defined as the process that physical objects use when they transform from one form to another, such as electricity into a light (bulb). The energy of the system can be defined in terms of the potential light you get get, aswell as heat. A simple analogy would be work in real life, like building a house. You have to work (use energy) to build the house (create light). You would say that work done by your hands in laying the bricks and mixing the cement is the same as the electrons moving through a wire to a filament in a bulb. The source of energy is the food your body turns into calories which is the same as having a source of electricity such as a battery. You can build the house or light the bulb for as long as the food lasts or electricity lasts in a battery. The energy then essentially equates to the amount of food because your potential to build the house will only last as long as you can feed your body to keep working. As you can see the potential work equates directly to the amount of food. Therefor we break the food down into say 10 days worth of food and say we have 10 days worth of energy (potential work). Strangely enough calories are actually units of joules which is a form of energy.
  4. I think its best we get YOUR definition of morality and compassion before we can go any further ......
  5. The arducopter is the process of using an arduino circuit and controlling 4 electrical motors; You'll need some power but that can be transformed so even 4 * AA will probably be suffice though you might want to find out about a small 12v battery. You can link each of the motors to transistors which are controlled by the arduino board and all the outputs get grounded to the battery (so the transistor + motor circuit have mutual ground), all you really have to do then is control when to switch on and off the motors Side project is buying a small camera and having a wireless module on the arduino that can communicate with wifi or bluetooth and then control it with an android app. I'd actually partake in this project to be honest, let me find out about part prices, i already have the arduino mega and uno and a wireless module. I can get a small schematic drawn up, the actual electrics shouldnt be overly difficult, getting powerful enough motors and then programming them might be though. I have absolutely no idea about aerodynamics so i'd have to ask my brother about it. Im not sure of the batteries weight but if we want decent power were probably looking for a 12v battery. I know it has something to do with fluid mechanics i think....but i also have no idea about the exact equations Ill try get a list of materials.
  6. Not much other than 4 decent motors and a programmable circuit board. And some math The rc have a primary motor and a motor for turning? you could probably use the primary but you'd need 3 more anyway unless you wanted to build a helicopter but the aerodynamics alot more complicated with them i think.
  7. The way we and flies perceive time will certainly differ but what about the cells that are in both the fly and the human, how is time perceived by them? How about a blade of light?? Time is a strange concept indeed.
  8. Investing in stocks for personal gain (right things for the wrong reason) or i could save the 10 people and let the 1 die (wrong things for the right reason) etc etc
  9. He's suggesting that image, the square with a central node, is a mathematical system that can be used to figure out any intangible physical property, So its the bases for maths. If it works. The physics he uses are examples of how the system can be used. As i've stated its pretty clear hes relating topology and logic to do create this mechanism. We'll have to wait and see what he says but thats what i perceived he was conveying. whether it works or not is accountable to whether you can disprove it or a fallacy in its definition. I dont think he was explicitly clear in his definition. Really a Theory of everything must relate the base units of: Temperature; Kelvins Mass; Kilograms Time; Seconds Chemical constant; Mol Light; Candela Electricity; Ampere Distance; Meter These are the physical base units which must all be accounted for, aswell as that though they must all conform to some base system that can link them, thats the mathematics......If the mathematical system can used to unite the units, it works. I doubt very much it does tho.
  10. You can do the right thing for the wrong reasons and the wrong thing for the right reasons...
  11. Im mixing up my quotes and references, the quote was of John but for Ed, the condescending part anyway, regarding the theory and proof i personally feel its pretty clear that he's attempting to define the basis of mathematics, or such a system that relates shape topology to logic. If such a system could be proven it may be possible to reverse engineer nature using and only using such a system. What i mean is; without the right foundation all other processes are best guesses, once the foundation is solid and other pieces of the jigsaw are plugged in then the larger picture becomes clearer. This is what i gathered from the OP. Therefor the "predictive power" of such a system could give you every possible formula / equation that can logically exist. Though his theory may be incorrect and demonstrably so (though mine was 2's compliment so not so) the value of such a system is the only real way to get any "predictive power" at all..... To sum up, The OP thinks he has a system that is the basis for all mathematics, such a basis is not waste of bandwidth because it is required for all other mathematics. If you think theres an error in the theory then state it, as i've already mentioned what the OP has attempted is not a far cry from bertrand russels principia mathmatica. The approach is different but the goal the same.
  12. Just show the OP why he's wrong rather than condescending his belief, its pretty pathetic. Your right its not the process of 2's compliment thats used, i was wrong. I miss read inverse and reverse.... For example, approaching it more like this seems more civil. If you think or know he's wrong and dont wanna give him the time of day then just dont, he only offered an 'idea'.......
  13. Its the same process .... Inverse the second number, add it to the first and take away the signifier..... Thats also the same process the OP uses in his so called *maths*......right.....atleast the first few steps. Did you actually evaluate the process he tried to convey??
  14. I just showed it working in decimal.....have a look. By your logic, no one would come up with new theories ever....quite literally. You probably havent even evaluated what was presented because it contradicts what you already understand.....(almost) every break through in maths or science usually is counter intuitive or contradictive. It's annoying that you think someones understanding of anything is a waste of bandwidth if you havent even attempted to understand what they are conveying. Don't misinterpret me though, i think the theory is very demonstrably wrong but not because he's "playing" on words, you simply have put the effort in. This is my point exactly, you've seen two's compliment in binary and know it exists there and automatically say the same process isn't apply-able else where, EVEN WHEN ITS RIGHT INFRONT OF YOUR EYES. I demonstrated the exact same method on decimal,.....did i not? Hes mixed shape topology with basic logic, now show him why he's wrong or else dont say anything........
  15. With such a condescending nature there is nothing to be learned. I find it strange when somebody explains things using written language instead of wholly mathematical and get criticized for it. In this case its not the clearest of explanations but the guy still tried. The math is actually called 2's compliment, it works in decimal as well as it does in binary. 90-70= ? 90 + 30 (inverse 70) = 120.....deduct the signifier. (in binary but most significant bit in decimal) 120 - 100 = 20. Also can you go into more depth about how translating any sequence of numbers into a single digit works? the digits represent 3 dimensional space in the picture so what do they represent after you apply the 2's compliment on them exactly? Its quite abstract and seems to lack meaning. How big can the sequence be? when you apply 234 (xyz) and compare it to 8(xyz) even the simplest of math doesnt relate, take 876 - 234 = 632, add these up to 11 okay and then add these to get 2, so using the applied logic to 234(xyz) were left with 2(z) when to create an absolute system it should equal 8(xyz) after the logics applied. I dont think your a million miles off, bertrand russel tried to create a logical system where pure numbers are defined and hence all of mathematics defined, all other laws are therefor a process of that logic (which is what i think your attempting to also do) but there are flaws in the system. Infinity being one of them. (small side note, your also defining operators using pure numbers when operators are a function of pure numbers, 1 is not + and 0 is not negative, + is AND and - is NOT (god that doesnt sounds right))
  16. 2 Things, when you say "peephole" are you alluding to the p != np problem? By giving the algorithm access to the data? Secondly theres a whole list of generic algorithms for path finding, as you mentioned heuristic mathematics is the basis. If the answer to the first is "yes" then the answer to your question is "yes", if by any other means your modifying the algorithm, such as giving it access to its own learned data, then the answer is "no" its not cheating, that is the basis for machine learning.
  17. Peyote cacti or Arducopter??
  18. Thats pretty harsh, with a little bit of understanding its clear the OP is trying to create a fundamental theory for mathematics of which all of science is defined. From abstract intangible idea's to concrete mathematical formula, to construct a system which all of the idea's can be defined by logic is partially a theory for everything...... Its also a theory not a proof which indicates it doesnt have to prove anything particular its simply a mechanism by which other systems can prove something....... I dont believe its a sound theory because certain aspects of mathematics can contradict the basis, the theory holds no place for infinity for starters...I personally believe existence of numbers is more closely related to circles than a 10 node topology... Also how does time exist within the theory? i see a fairly clear definition of the 3 dimensional space but no mention of time. Regards.
  19. Yeh quite specifically that, what about long term build up? How well does it cross the blood brain barrier? And does it enter through atmosphere or specific chemical ingestion / biosythn?
  20. So they can block neuron receptors? Or some particular aspect of the cell like mitochondria?? IS this also part of the reason lead and mercury are poisonous?
  21. Yes that thread, my post is a copy and paste from a nootropic forum but obviously wouldnt want kids buying untested nootropoic drugs, though they are perfectly legal.
  22. Few recent threads have me worried, how much information should i freely offload?? If someone asks a legit question, should i be answering it to my full potential? I may have given out too much information to someone probably too young but i didnt conceive this when i answered....im also drunk....so errrrm, shit.
  23. How old are you? i may have made a novice mistake here......
  24. Under the same name?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.