DevilSolution

I second this notion, however i'd still much prefer to learn swedish.

Yeh thats it i think.

There's plenty of scientific theory's (not even hypotheses actual thoery's) that compete within physics, both are used for specific tasks are known to be accurate in the way that they are used but ultimately contradict each other in some for or another. Both theory's are true scientifically until proven otherwise as they both are proven by the field inwhich they are used. Firstly; There is some ultiamte truth behind Goldbach's Conjecture, one way or the other it is true or it is false, because its not false its equally as true. I imagine it could be true, i also imagine it could be false, if i couldnt imagine it to be true; it would be false. An example is that i cant imagine a number or form of logic that has no abstract application, i can imagine a form of logic that draws an abstract relationship between the speed of light and my friends cat. If i cant imagine it, it is false, if i can its true, "if i can imagine it" to be true but i weigh that its probably false then "it is possible" but it probably doesnt exist. As previously states "can" exist and "will" exist are very different. Referring back to the OP, i replied: Essentially anything that exists through logical deduction must necessarily exist, as a process of its own logic. If we cant conceive it, it doesnt exist, if we can then it exists as a representation of some model of reality, tied to it directly via the system that creates both. Remember how powerful science is before you say anything is impossible, to say something is impossible is less scientific than saying everything is possible. (and less imaginative )

What? how you gona get those files onto someone elses OS? I wasnt really talking about reverse engineering the whole of windows xp source, i meant if you already had it.

To clarify do you mean that the space behind which the paper folds is also space? as in outside of the x , y and z there is more? You would have to travel to the limit of either the x , y or z to hit a wall and that is 0 on one of the other axis's. In reference to the way i conceive it, you would have to travel backwards in time to hit that wall, or else the wall is what stops you from traveling backwards in time. They are the boundries of physical reality. The remaining 1/4 of the circle if placed at origin cannot pass through those boundries. That's awesome, did you actually build that? i can make a killer aeroplane and what is it?

I've only heard "one in a million", used when referring to someone or something unique or the probability of an occurrence; "you have one in a million chance of winning the lottery".

I can see some correlation, not direct but perhaps partially related yes.

You can draw a map of the requests you receive. ICMP are common but page requests, when not dealt with sufficeintly, can single handedly bring down a server. I'm only offering another suggestion to check.

That sounds interesting, you using formal proof or computational?

The source you gave is answered based on interpretation, you have to read the specified documentation and correctly interpret it.

Just so your aware, ddos isnt the only way to bring a site down, if you edit your packet you can request a callback from the server but extend the time to like 500ms and delete the return to sender ip, if you spam enough of those kinds of packets the server will hold onto them for the full half a second and then throw them out. Basically clogging up your server with long requests rather than instant you dont need a botnet to grind a server down. You can fine tune this in the config files on the server though, i only know the theoretical side of this type of attack. Regards. (i think the packets are udp, if this helps)

Its the facial expression, that is all.......and the fact he psychotic murderer on trial in the actual pitures.

What>>??

Are you gambling on them or are they gambling on you?

I see the pun, i think its the natural direction though. The dimensions and circles, atleast in mind, are entwined. I've tried to demonstrate it but its very difficult to illistrate it without repeating myself inadvertently. In all honesty i've no idea how to express going from the 3D to the 4D, that looping process, its hard to explain it. I could be totally wrong. I said an EM sine wave is a good example but i think they use both sine and cosine, one for the electro wave and one for the magnetic wave, working together but at opposed angles. I just wanted to know if theres any flaws in my concept really.

I had already defined it in these terms. Your only iterating my point. You refute my hypothesis and conclusion but have expressed no reason why, not logically, not even in english. If a circle is an abstract noun, what is time? I'm not, im explaining the relationship of time to a circle, shedding light on its irrational nature.

Well there isn't in reality and maths is mapped to reality. The 2D representation of the circle gives a good approximation, but its not perfect either because its attempting to use 2D maths to explain a 4D object. Thats why pi or 2rads never ends. How about the example of 3/4 of a circle, Is there anything wrong in using that as a representation of 3D space? If 3D + time is 4D then its obvious where i got my conclusion that the last 1/4 creates time.

I'm not alone in my thinking, others like russell have attempted to prove indefinitely that maths is infact only an extension of logic. Calculators and more specifically processors somewhat prove this. They are accurate relative to the amount of binary digits (tracks) we can use. Perhaps saying logic is 2D may be more ambiguous because im not thoroughly defining what 2 dimensions are. My definition in these terms simply refers to the connecting of any 2 points, a single vertices is suffice for a 2D definition, though in our reality this is almost boundless. This requires a level of articulation i dont posess, however i do have a visual representation of how i understand it, which should help give some indication for my belief. The 2D The 3D As you can see, the 2D circle has 90" missing but still accounts for x,y and z from the source. If the source is the point of origin and the x, y and z have no bounds, we have a boundless 3D space. (obviously mine are bound by the size of the paper and circle but in reality they aren't) This where my comprehension of the cirlce gets fuzzy, because were missing the 90" and we've made 3D using the 270" i equate that this remainder 90 somehow accounts for time, though time is a non-visual entity so it cant be shown. I suggest it creates a looping process much in the same way the 2D visual representation of a circle loops infinitely. However i only believe this because there is no such thing in our form of mathematics and reality as a perfect circle. The perfect circle is the looping of 4D. I have no idea how. But it does. A final note, spheres and all other shapes can exist within the second image, Its strange to conceptualise but imagine your floating somewhere in that 3D, you would exist identically to how you do now except you exist in 3/4 of a circle AND without time. There is nothing inside that 3/4 of a circle to create time, it requires the last 1/4, using some non-visual process, it loops, like the sine wave of the EM spectrum, it loops. Its also a recursive process if you define a point as a circle. Everything exist's as an amalgamation of that point.

It'd be like: SELECT FullWord FROM AbrreviationTable WHERE Abbreviation = 'OMG'; FullWord column correlates to Abbreviation column. ID Abbreviation FullWord 1 OMG oh my god 2 CBA can't be arsed 3 CEEBS .....etc

Suffice to explain means it was clearly demonstrated. or shows. Geneva 1910" and "Petrograd 1920" shows clearly why freud lacked this particular tool. They are places, but in this context they i think they represent works of literature.

The citizens might be but their language isnt. Language is the primary form of commication between all humans, artists draw paintings, photographers take pictures, musicians make music, dancers dance, mathematitians create equations. For one to talk to the other they must use some mutual form of communication, this is language, it is also i presume the root of thoughts, at the minimum its the most effective method of conveying non-communicative thoughts. Emotions for example are not thoughts but a path for which your thoughts will end up manifesting themselves. How would a blind man think? If language is the primary source of thoughts, or how to communicate those thoughts THEN are all english talking nations unsolubly english??

As in shift + 2? check keyboard setting's or shift key. Or d'ya mean on this forum??, if its the forum its probably your browser, not the OS. Dno tho.

I'm just throwing it out there, in 3D graphics distance is represented by the cartesian plane so im probably getting confused.

Have a look at the cartesian plane, you can have sin, cos, - sin, -cos to represent angles. If you had -sin(20) the angle would be below 0 on the x axis. Its not in a negative dimension though it represents polarity. The same applies with length, a negative length would indicate a direction, as unity said, variable to time.