DevilSolution

I'd imagine rotational force to be stronger than that of spinning on its axis.

Sometimes they get trapped though, and need a little if misguided inspiration from the box they have found themselves stuck in. The more you distil a belief upon someone the stronger it becomes, to the point they wont accept any other truth. We sit in a box, watching a box while typing into a box. Anyone who's able to think in abstract terms has the inclination to think outside the box. Thereby defining exactly what the box is.

Thank you mig. Do you know if the combination of factors such as the planets rotating in *mostly the same direction, the fact that they are all relatively even on which ever axis they sit and the energy of spin they each posses would contribute to a larger force that one could be defined as creating a larger gravitational force? As in the specific arrangement or alignment of our solar system might suggest it has a greater attractive force due the combination of said factors?

how does a rock and a rope spin? unless im spinning them. This is pedantic and honestly tiresome. HERE...... is there any advantage to it? Having the alignment of planets on the same axis and moving in the same direction? Yeh i wont lie, its all pretty much stems from you. Your reply, no one else's admittedly, it was demeaning which was unnecessary and then after i pointed out that my WHOLE post was about the galaxy and the system as a whole you got defensive. (then it came down to semantics, like my post was incomprehensible) and no, no one has answered my question regarding whether the galaxy with its alignments and planets moving in the same direction while spinning on their axis on the same axis has a gravitational proponent....i aint after prizes kid i want answers.

You'd argue with a robot, i'll make you one. Humanitarian studies are not exclusive of logic, they are subjective aspects of your reality, which eventually boils down to philosophy which is founded in logic. What's not logical about poetry? How do humans evolve language? its logical progression. (beyond your logic perhaps, but i can perfectly well express my appreciation of the arts, they are abstract forms of expression in which humans endeavour to conceive an image of the human condition, whats illogical about that? Or do you mean you cant explain or express how or why something makes you feel?) No who don't what? (and why wont they when?)

Listen, i honestly dont care for pedantics or otherwise, if you cant comprehend what it is that im conveying dont reply. Actually if you cant comprehend what it is im conveying dont reply with something thats as meaningless to the conversation and now how meaningless this conversation is. There were SINCERE questions and insincere answers, thats it, nothing else. down arrow is -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\/

Humans cant comprehend beyond logic, to argue otherwise would illogical. And because we cant comprehend what isnt in some form or another logic, were constrained to the boundaries of it. And as such we sit here, using our logic to make people feel stupid, because they cant comprehend a basic fallacy. Well, thats up to you guys, if people want to believe that something exists beyond the realms of comprehension, then why shouldnt they? Because you cant? You dont know if there exists something beyond the realms of human comprehension. Infact you will specifically not know, because you wont entertain such notions, if i had to hedge my bets on where matter and energy come from then i'd like to think theres a possibility that something created it, and not just for humans but for all creatures. Unfortunately im not a betting man so i'll just stick with being pedantic. Everyone knows religion was a tool for control, used for evil and of "no scientific use", but parables were written so humans dont make the same stupid mistakes we always have, they have meaning if you wish to look. asalamu alaykum

I dont care for semantics, if i said rotate someone would find something else that isnt explicitly defined. It's all within context if anybody bothered reading.

21 quenstion marks not including the 2 rhetorical ones....and a link to wiki Well it worth it in the end then, getting something i could have googled. Goodnight laaa. and strange chill man, no one cares, just dont answer questions with wiki and sarcasm. Insincerity, the first is demeaning the second is a sarcastic response to some honest questions.

Spinning a rock around myself, not myself spinning. Is there any need? I'll read up on the wiki page tomorrow, thanks again. Like i've asked plenty of questions, you can either answer or not, if not send me the link and ill do my own research. As i said earlier the reason for being on a science forum is to ask questions, which no one has attempted at answering. Now i must really get some sleep....

Then add the rest of the planets and were talking. and thats without accounting for alignment and interconnections. I'm not talking about just earth, im talking about the system as a whole, acting as a force. Thank you for your input though. I'm too tired to read through the rigid motor page right now as i've not slept and it looks pretty hard going, but just to iterate, all i've been on about is the system as a whole, its interactions and alignments relative to other bodies in space, and asking for example, does the positioning add to the systems force, as opposed to some other galaxy that doesnt have all the properties ive listed above. It would seem to me as if our solar system would act as if it has more gravitation force due to its celestial alignment.

"This article is about the rotation of an object around a single axis (a one-dimensional rotation). For the kinetic energy of an object that rotates in three dimensions, see rigid rotor.:" Yeh spinning on our axis? have we got our notions confused? I mean rotation around the sun not our angular momentum. But even that adds to the system, if the planets also rotate the same way, as well moving in the same direction, on almost the same axis. The rigid rotor was what i was after i think.

Yeh but relatively speaking, mercury spinning around the sun is fast in comparison to pluto, so it exerts more force? and when we say force what are we describing? Because what does the angle, direction and speed of the object have to do in relation with the speed and direction of the orbiting planet? I presume it add's to the gravitational force but then it could pull the object in and give it more momentum and velocity in another direction? Like boomerang around the planet and be thrust off with a higher velocity and maybe even give it extra angular motion? Also a collection of planets in alignment must equate to the sum of some equation, given the body as a whole, the energy it can relay onto other objects must be larger than if they weren't aligned. Probably quite intricately so. Or would it be the result of randomness? a sun with the same amount of planets orbiting but in different directions and totally different axis and orbit formation could potentially thrust an object in the exact same way? But still the alignment as a whole would be a greater attraction force, not to mention the maths behind calculating it would be simpler than a complex arrangement. Here's a question, is there any advantage to it? Having the alignment on the same axis and moving in the same direction?

So then for instance, the fact that all the planets in our solar system are approximately* equidistant or within some range of each other on which ever axis we define, does that then have an amplified effect in terms of not only the amount of planets that rotate around the sun but also the fact that each also has some effect on the other. I mean if all the planets are fairly well aligned along a single axis rotating around the sun, aswell as having some minimal effect on each other, this must create some sort of vacuum. And again would this not give the "illusion" of polarisation. I imagine it like a whirlwind, where the speed of the inner planets rotate so fast even relative to the bigger giants on the edge. If you were a pebble travelling below our solar system, would this orbital attract the pebble by gravity or by the fact that the equilibrium of the planets in orbit at such high speed (say the pebble was travelling slowly) that it would suck up the space below and push it to the space above. Given it doesn't hit a planet. Infact the strange alignment of planets themselves almost lends the object a path through by counter directing it from one mass to the other eventually projecting it outwards in whatever angular motion the force dictates (relative to its interference with planets while travelling though and also its initial velocity and direction). Like im probably way of track here, and thank you MigL for pointing out that gravity and EM are the only long range forces (given the other 2 are sub atomic). But if space itself is a vacuum and we then apply aligned angular motion (to a high degree) would there not be some fundamental force created by such a system. As opposed to a sun where its planets dont travel in the same direction, or on the same axis or at high speeds (i think maybe venus goes counter clockwise?) but anyway in general they go in the same direction. Like the polarisation concept is more analogous to the effect than it actually having poles but i imagine that force is partly related to gravity in so much as anything that either uses or gives motion to other objects via pure magnitude, speed and alignment could be seen to have a mass? like our solar systems mass is enlarged by this alignment of momentum. Also why does angular motion around the sun delay us from just being sucked in by its mass ratio to ours or mercury for a better example. The suns mass relative as a ratio to mercury over that distance, if you applied newtons laws of physics of [math] G = \tfrac{S_M * M_M}{d^2}[/math] surely the sun shouldnt entertain this spinning as a way of changing its pull on mercury. Angular motion must then somehow exhibit some laws in relation to gravity? Sorry i know i could read up on it but i guess thats why im a member of a science forum. Regards. So there's a direct relation between angular motion, velocity and alignment with gravity? An extension to the force it exhibits?

I have a question regarding gravity, if you spin something really fast, i mean like spinning a rope with a rock tied to the end and im spinning it almost faster than you can see that the object is there. Would there be a force from this? Expanding from there, if i was spinning this rock in space (again faster than your eye could perceive but the rock is heavy and im strong) , with no air or other fluid just the vacuum of the void. If you were standing say 2m away from me would you feel any kind of force? Say were both facing each, such that were adjacent to each other and you tried walking towards me, would you feel a pull or a push or neither? And you are ovcourse made from nanotubes and decide to carry on walking towards me, not very fast, just a gentle stroll, would the spinning of the rock (thats made of nanotubed also) stop you from getting into my orbit? Finally while im spinning this rock, would there be any force emitted above or below me? like a fan so to speak, without the edged rotors or air fluid, would the spinning of this rock create something you might otherwise say is polarised? like a magnet, where one end pulls and the pushes coming from circular angular motion hence spreading (i'd imagine) evenly in every direction, even being pulled back down below me. Would there be any logic to that analogy at all? I'm honestly curious.

Usually with them add ons you can email the creator directly and ask for a special licence for learning purposes. I think we got like statistics for like £10. Don't quote me though. c++ is a good place to start because you get a bit of both worlds, some higher level features and some lower level features. Mostly everything that can be done in c can be done in c++ and then you get the bonus namespaces, classes, unions etc (though i dont know how much unions differ from a typedef struct) but yeh its OOP capable though i dont know think its built with OOP in mind. And you can dip into all the c libraries you want aswell as c++ and DLL's so c++ is the way to go. Pythons nicer on eyes and usually alot quicker at getting a job done though. You'll carry alot of c++ with you into mostly any language (other than some of the older more specific languages).

Having an active interest in what your learning helps, 3/4 of what i know is through curiosity and wanting to understand and the other 1/4 is because i had to understand that 1/4 to learn some of the 3/4. If you dont have a real interest in the subject or topic then there's always looking at it from a personal perspective of growing as a person, most people would say they arent capable of higher level maths or physics when in reality they are perfectly capable they just dont have the right guidance or pre-requisites. I dont really think its hours in a day more that you actively achieve a goal or understanding of something, whatever that thing may be. If you struggle concentrating for long periods like i do then break it up with something you enjoy as a reward, such for example i will understand fractions then have a break. Or in my case finish this algorithm then have a break, which is what im kinda doing now so best get back.

Theres liquid crystals that change colour when in contact with heat, even small amounts, so if you were to place the encased crystals on something (even your hand) they will change colour. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_crystal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBBA

Upon impact of what? light? another chemical? or another object?

So its that cloud looking structure they saw? looks pretty cool, is the darker region based on angle or size? I think your getting confused, although they share the same definition in terms of measurement they ultimately function differently, as i said in my previous post "it can travel 2 units of distance in 10 units of time" so obviously its travelling at 1/5 the speed of light, but also time exists as a constant, that measurement of an "instant" is constantly ticking away, where as distance is relative to object and force etc. Its as i said in my OP what is the limit of physics? is there one? and if so it must surely based on the SOL? thats the simple premise here. As for finding that distance, scientists should put there brains together and think of an optimal method. In all honesty its not far from the "atomic clock" method, except were ditching frequency for the photon. and not necessarily concerned with the frequencies they use either, using optical frequencies when you have gama frequency just hows that isnt the best possible method. And even with gama frequency, i dont imagine its faster than the SOL, would seem to break the rules of physics, a wave where its frequency is faster than the speed it travels? This is the whole point im trying to make though, what the limit? if gama radiation > SOL OR neutrino > SOL then you start thinking different, but until then the SOL is that unit. (and its not likely to happen either, how do you measure something faster than the SOL when the SOL is the basic tool for measuring, its mathematically possible ovcourse, but it would be hard to prove) And as far as this measurement always changing, thats dependant on the method and accuracy used in finding the smallest distance that can be measures and also if the SOL is the fastest thing that exists. optimum method + SOL being the fastest = best solution.

havent used python for years, but whats the hash for? its usually used a declaration for pre-compilation. Yeh get matlab student edition is £50 or something? very cheap i dont know if the # is for a func declaration but it usually has like func return name(data)

You'r mistaking the general use of time with what the abstract concept of time really is, time doesnt exist as the earth spinning around the sun, we just put dates and times on them as a record for outselves. Time in its most simplest form can be expressed as a "moment" in which something changed. The idea behind space-time was to entwine the dimensions we see and perceive x,y,z with this abstract notion of time, in doing so your encompassing time as an indistinguishable property of the universe (unlike the idea that time is based on the earth spinning around the sun), Also when you define a 4th dimension like this you extend physics to the extent that new theories and rules can be conceived from such a notion. Essentially if time didnt exist, we would all be stationary objects that cant and will never move, by adding time to the previous dimensions it then allows the universe to move and interact. There are other more specific rules drawn up by space time such as how time can bend around space and objects and such but im not physicist so i dont know the whole concept.

https://wikileaks.org/tisa/

Well yes thats what he meant when he asked on what type of data does it supply Depending on the format of the data it should be easy to put into your algorithm. The type of algorithm is dependant on what you want to do with that data, data representation and storage is most important, get the data into the form you want it and make sure you select the right method for storing that data, like a structure or array. Then its just the functions you wish to manipulate the data as required then have your algorithm output the data to your primary domain or server space. When you say "RFID" your referring to the little chips in security and access cards and such? If so does that mean you are authenticating access via RFID and then have system control / manage or view the data of multiple air conditioners? As far predicting a breakdown thats pretty random, if you have past data to query you could probably use pattern recognition to find any recurring issues and then have specific functions monitor that particular aspect of the air conditioner. Other than that you just apply basic logic to the data, if(temp > threshold){shutdown} etc

I think it would be great that these features exists within each of our user space, they can be made public so people can see what your currently working on or follow your progress. Also i think it would make the forum more inclusive in the sense that people can get involved and help if they wished. To be honest im about to make an action plan and gantt chart for pattern recognition (broad) and pattern recognition within timeseries. Is the captain the main programmer? Theres probably generic templates for all 3 of these items implemented in php/js ?