ox1111

Kind of hard to follow you. Matter does collapse in the formation of, say a neutron star. Theoretical at C, though that isn’t proven, nor can it be at this point in time. Photon slows at high energies? They slow when going through dense clear matter like diamonds. The wave length has different energy. Speed in a vacuum is always C I believe?

I know the old and maybe currant nuc’s were built with thin walls and pressure tanks. You only need the strength at lift off and till the G’s taper off. I guess if you intend to reuse it, it doesn’t make much sense. Magnesium is great, but flammable. They have used it successfully in formula 1, but their have been cases of detonation. Still seems viable for many parts. I never real thought about rocket, but your post was so detailed and I love creative problem solving. Could you do a cylinder inside a cylinder design with your extrusion having a double wall? I would not recommend a tank inside of a tank, but your double wall extrusion providing a fail safe maybe ok, and with a little radial trussing between tank super strong maybe even strong enough to reduce your extruded thickness. If I started a space rocket program from scratch, I would probably start with a ground tank system with high pressure hoses feeding the rocket to a 100 or 150ft and then have them detach with exploding bolt with a snap coupling back-up. That way you are not lifting your lift off fuel saving cargo cap. Sounds crazy but its real not, hoses these days are super strong and flame retardant and we use them to feed blast furnaces and other app.

You would have to read a couple of pages to understand my post. It did not directly refer to the conn. shooting.

I don't believe you can compress space. Particles do pop in and out of existence in empty space, this we know as fact; why that is not factually known. Empty space is only all 0, because we can't measure or our brains can't conceive of what is their. Without instruments there are many things we can’t detect, magnetic fields, neutrinos, even temperature above the it burnt me point, unless you consider man that is super hot or dude it is cold out good measurements. You keep referring to all the things you can’t do in space, change your perspective. How can light, planets, you, or stars travel trough or exist in zero. You s I don't believe you can compress space. Particles do pop in and out of existence in empty space, this we know as fact; why that is not factually known. Empty space is only all 0, because we can't measure or our brains can't conceive of what is their. Without instruments there are many things we can’t detect, magnetic fields, neutrinos, even temperature above the it burnt me point, unless you consider man that is super hot or dude it is cold out good measurements. You keep referring to all the things you can’t do in space, change your perspective. How can light, planets, you, or stars travel trough or exist in zero. You spend most of the beginning of learning trying to understand the emptiness of space, now it is hard to think different. How can you travel through something that isn’t their. I am saying there is great, no enormous energy allowing this. Imagine living in a solid universe and ask yourself how much energy it would take to create space. All energy is pure energy. IDK why they say light is, but if I had to call one thing pure energy I would call the emptiness of space pure energy.

Getting rid of most laws seems imposible and crazy. I was raise in the city of reading. Almost always in the top ten of crime and was #1 in poverty in national news. Then I moved when I was about 25yr to 20miles away to a small town 20 miles outside Reading. Was their still crime yes, but much less. The town is just as poor and people with in the town live just as close. My town has no police department. We have section 8 apartmens in town and when thugs come here to live they find out 2 things 1: with no police the people in the town are better at dealing with problems them self and 2 no police seemed great for them, but they find out much worse. 20 min drive takes you to another small town with a large police department and high crime. the police their is for the whole area but only patrol that town and only drive out when called. Most place on earth are police free living, thats not to say their are no police, just that they are far enough away to be nothing but recorders of crimes and by the time they get their if anyone or evidence is their it is because they choose to be. Their are not police in nature and it seems to run just fine. I personal dislike police and the law, I find it gets in the way and complicates things and most of the time the police them self hate their job because they disagree with what they enforce. P.S. I moved here to raise my kids, the young and old are fine.

The human brain is not used to capacity. That's not even an argument. The fact that you can remove large parts of it and have it function at 100% percent or near , makes that very obvious. The only animal I can think of that has a larger brain and humans are certain whales. Let me say this a different way, life is efficient, efficiency is survival. The human mind uses up to 20% of the body's caleries. If half a brain can do what a full brain can do and require less growth less development less nutrition less mass passing through the women's birth canel, hell lets take 10lbs off are neck. The human brain is evolutionary waste. It makes no sense

Prostitution

Evolution and natural selection does not explain the human brain, or does it and human history is very, very wrong. The problem with the human brain and human history is that the human brain exceeds our capacity to use it at the current time. This is not a problem with evolution, because evolution works with mutation, so the human brain could have grown to an enormous size through mutation. Even though our use of our mind has not kept pace with it size. The problem is with people who are gifted. I'm not talking about idiot savant's I'm talking about people who have amazing talents and still live perfectly normal lives. People with photographic memories, human calculators. I seen a man who could draw an entire city. That he looked at less than 30 seconds. I seen on TV, a man who can learn any language in three days. Having an enormous brain, in which we all use 15 to 20% of coincides with evolution. But the fact that the 80% of the brain that we don't use some people can use and tap into and it functions is quite to the contrary. My point is that the 80% of the brain that is unused, should be proteins and brain cells and mass. It should not have structure and programming. It should not be usable even if you could tap Into it should not function. The fact that it does function tells me that at one time we did use a larger percentage of her brain, and for some reason no longer use it. Why?Their are many case where a person has a whole lobe removed and still live good to normal lives and some cases 98% normal. What reason could we in the past have used a larger percentage of our brain and develop the mind, the programming in the part of the brain, that we no longer use. Don't say hunting or living in the forest or jungle because people still to live in the forest and jungle and their brains function just like ours. Maybe we really are like the movie blue Lagoon, but instead of a boat wreck and an island, it be a UFO Time Machine or wormhole and we were stranded on earth. If we continue to not use a large percent of are brain, will are brains start to shrink and evolve to be more efficient?

We should place as much faith as we have courage. It used to be people respected each others freedom and rights because if they didn't they could be on the losing end of a fight. Now people respect each other because fear of the law. This is why the first is better. The law can't be everywhere, infact many of these shootings these days have little to do with the people and more to do with contempt for the law. We effectively prevented the fist fights of the past by legally chopping off everyones hands. Gun laws are foolish, the stricter the law the worse the crime to escape it. 1 We made drugs illegal, people still use them, but we created drug cartels. 2 We made booze illegal and people still drank, but we created gangsters. 3 We made sex illegal and I wonder how much this increases rape? Point, this country is safety crazy to the point we throw freedom out the window and this turns around and makes us less safe, and then we make more laws and throw out more freedom and then that back fires and make us even less safe. You would thing we would figure out this and stop, but we won't because unlike nature we let pu----ies run our country.

If you're referring to gravity waves the way they do in fluid dynamics, then no, it would not exceed C. The leading edge of ST is referring to the beginning of the big bang. It is common theory now that expansion happened at greater than c for a brief period. Whether or not this expansion could or did create mass or accelerated that mass beyond C is Theory on my part. I believe if you do accelerate mass beyond C it becomes ST. I have been playing around with a theory the are universe is dense and that ST, better yet I will post it sometime I am working on a few.

After reading all this I must say, you probably shouldn't waste your time. If you really insist the best idea I can come up with is use a weed Wacker engine with a flexible shaft to drive the wheel or if you want to go electric. I'm sure a 20 V lithium-ion battery pack and a half inch chuck, Dewalt drill will get you going, and they come with three speeds so you could pick the one that works for you. That'll get you testing and prototyping and you can fill out what you need from their.

If I had to guess I would say that the article was talking about CVT transmissions. These are automatic transmissions that have a single adjustable gear you may have seen similar transmissions like this on band saws. Some milling machines, or drill presses. Basically, you use a V-shaped belt and a sliding pulley to change ratio. The advantage to these is technically you can have the perfect ratio all the time. The disadvantage of these are that they seem to have the worst ratio all the time and they cannot hold up to much power. Although improvements are made all the time and new versions are in use in many new cars.

With the extruded design, it would probably be unwise to make fuel tanks out of it, unless holes were drilled so fuel could fill the cavities, otherwise the temperature difference could buckle the aluminum. In most of these rockets. The pressure of the fuel prevents buckling, so are you talking about making the entire rocket out of extruded aluminum or just the parts where cargo would be held? Are these the be used for space or weapons, space all the loads are with gravity and multidirectional strength is unnecessary?

Particles pop into existence all the time in empty space. They pop in and most the time pop right back out of existence. Something to remember is all the matter in the universe is believed to be expanding because of the red shift. This however does not prove that space-time or space itself is expanding that is unproved theory. Even this expansion has flaws. One of the witches we can only prove one half of the universe is expanding. In theory, the singularity could've been struck on one side and only exploded in one direction.

This is such a diverse article. I'll stick to subjects that others may not. In trueth we as a nation defy nature and wonder why things are getting worse. In us past it was very common for 25yr to date 14yrs. I can't say this works today because it really only works in women being homemaker societies. 14yr girls are looking for love and today we see them as children, frankly you can't even stand to be around them. It really does make more sense that at least one of the two people having sex is mature and if she would get preg. that he can afford to raise the baby. This also makes boys mature into men, because in the societies such as these boys are undesirable and not only must mature, but must reach a social status before breeding. This sounds terrible but let's look at our current model We in America now like to keep our teens banging other teens in turn having teen mothers and fathers both being terrible parents teen pregnancy is draining society's wealth and each generation regressing to the fact of having immature and unprepared parents. Let's keep allowing generation after generation of babies raising babies and see how fast we can turn back in the caveman. To me it seems both methods seem unsettling but keeping everybody a virgin till 25 years old doesn't seem fair either. I have four children two boys and two girls and a lot of figuring out. One thing I can be sure of is that I will not let societies norms dictate my actions. I would like to thank the original poster of this article for the courage it must have taken to bring the subject to light and a maturity in which it was done.

Reading through these posts I find most people's opinion very interesting. The most important thing of all these posts is that there are many different opinions from many different types of people. Our founding fathers realizes, they realize that no one is truly right or wrong and that with freedom everybody can get their way. Rules and laws only really help the criminal, because they only pertain to law-abiding folk. Freedom is not free in fact it has a heavy toll, it requires courage, requires tolerance, it requires belief for your fellow man. Every year more laws rules and regulations are passed and every year more criminals are made. It is very simple, for every law rule or regulation made a certain percentage of the population will be on the losing end of the stick. The more laws the higher the percentage. This will hit a tipping point where as the losing end of the stick gets to be larger than the winning end. There is only two outcomes:1 you live in a society of hierarchy. 2 the so-called underbelly of society overthrows the hierarchy. We are not free we lacked courage we lack tolerance and we have little belief in our fellow man.

This really has to do with different cultures of people assigning different colors the different wavelengths of light. I was just watching a program about a tribe in Africa that only has five words for colors when asked what color the sky was the answer was black, where as Westerners would always say blue. Color is perceived by humans in two ways, one by the cones in her eyes which range anywhere from 2 to 4, four being in very rare. The second way people perceive color is cultural people tend to only know the colors or have words for colors when it is relative in her lifestyle. Such is the tribe in Africa which really only needs Brown black green yellow and orange, because this tribe lives in the area that these are the only colors that are relevant. Most people are often surprised to find out how very much difference there is between people when it comes to color detection, from one end of the spectrum or people only see shades of gray to the other end where people see hundreds of thousands a shades.

I must say I am not a fan of this idea of the red shift value being different. This is a theory and a math problem, the problem is the values of the equation are a guess at best, yet this is a very popular answer. We truely can't even prove the red shift for moving galaxies is truely 100% and not caused by dark energy.

If ST is the fabric of our universe and warpage of ST is what causes the effect of gravity, the leading edge of the expanding ST would infact be the first gravitional wave and weather it could move mass about c is up for debate. I would guess yes and would convert matter to ST to help fuel the proccess. I would not tell you this is anything but my logic, but it is sound. Gravity waves can exceed c if ST can expand faster than c because gravity waves are just ripples in ST.

They recently viewed stars moving at 99.9% the speed of light around the supermassive blackhole in the middle the Milky Way galaxy. The controversy with this is that the gravitational pull of the supermassive blackhole would exceed gravity squared they say the gobbling of space at the event horizon of the blackhole does not break Einstein's theory of relativity because space has no mass theory being that mass cannot be accelerated by gravity to higher than the speed of light but gravity itself may move much faster. Along the same lines space-time accelerated many times faster than the speed of light when created by the Big Bang and again they say this doesn't break the theory relativity because space-time has no mass, the matter contained within this space-time later in the expansion of the universe contains gravity. If space-time can be created at a greater speed than light and gravity is a warpage is space-time and I stands to reason that gravity can be faster than us be like without breaking Einstein's relativity.

Occam's razor states that the simplest answer is usually the correct one. Dark energy and dark matter what not just exist in empty space would exist right in front of you right now. Many times people want a picture dark energy and dark matter they picture this empty space between galaxies, it's easy to forget that it would exist right under your nose.

My suggestion would be to first redefine efficiency. I live in Pennsylvania so in the wintertime when the heat of the lightbulb is not wasted it technically is much more efficient than what is rated at. I would also think that a coating that can convert infrared light to visible light would help greatly or possibly a one-way mirrored effect in which infrared light was reflected back to the tungsten filament, but visible light was able to transmit.

Empty space is something for it exist. Einstein a side. Many say ST was created in the big bang. Sciences currant understanding of empty space is ignorant for many reasons. To name a few. We know in empty space particle are constantly popping in and out of existance. 2 we believe 90% of the universe is made of dark matter and dark energy and we have know idea what either of them are. 3 This is my own: existance is positive, empty space can be measured so it diamentionally exists. Energy finds balance in every form we know of so for space to be empty it must contain enough energy in some form to be balanced.

Gravity in not believed to travel at c, It is thought to be either instant or travel as fast as c2. Massless particles is used fairly common, but I believe this to be incorrect as well. we know light can and does excelerate space probes and we explain this as radiant energy, but energy with out mass has no inertia and clearly makes no sense. I don't believe in massless particles, I would venture to say that at the mass level and speed the convertion of energy is 100%. I would go as far as saying you can not have energy without mass and I know this is not conventional, but energy as we know it is motion and their is no motion without mass.

I'm by no means an expert, but I know a magnet doesn't have to physically touch metal to magnetize it. No, they would not = in strength. The strength of a magnet is due to its atomic make-up and not due to the strength of the field that magnetizes it, meaning a ceramic magnet will never be stronger than a neodymium magnet just because you charge them up the same.