pioneer

This idea popped into my head while I was taking my nighly swim. It is a way to travel back into time, without violating any laws of physics, using only well established principles of physics. It ends with a twist. Picture this scenario, you share a large house with a group of closest friends, both male and female. One day you leave the house to get some adult refreshments and NASA scoops the house up and send it into space at near light speed. In their reference, say, only a day goes by, due to their relativistic velocity. But in your reference, say 20 years go by. After twenty years, NASA puts the house back. When you go to see your old friends, they have not aged but a day. Essentially by visiting them you go back in time twenty years. After one day nothing has change among your friends. There are still expecting the adult refreshments. You friend buzzard is still has the same pizza stain on his shirt. The house becomes a relativistic time capsule, which allows you to go back into time, without violating any of the laws of physics. This is a two for one deal. Your friends get to see someone from the future. You tell then how the Red Sox won the world series in 2015.

I never published my data because there was too much of it. What I was trying to do was approach the anatomical problem from the inside-out. The goal was to get a handle on the conscious dynamics. I did create a mathematical analogy that allows one to sort of plot all these things in one graph. Different parts of the graph imply consciousness and other part of the graph were the biochemical and anatomical. Those latter parts are what you guys are working on, so I tried to populate the rest. Before getting into that I would like to describe behavior software by looking at a human baby. When a baby is born, it has no ego or center of consciousness. It is instinct using software for crying and nursing. The crying creates output for mom so she can input sensory data. For all practical purpose the infants software is driving the maternal dynamics. It may be helpless but its software's output, requires tending to. As the infant gets a little older, it may start using software ,that gets the ball rolling, so the baby can learn to crawl. It begins by moving the arms and the legs. Eventually the software tries to flip the baby over to strengthen the arms. Then it begins to combine these activities and the babt begins to crawl. That goal was already set in the software at birth. The software only needed to collect data so it could wire the brain. Here is the gist of what is going on. The brain waves, indicative of being alive, constantly output potential to the core of the brain. If the core merely sent it back, there would be sort of a steady state. Instead, the software causes the core energy to create focus, or many points of focus, that can then migrate within the cerebral. What is essentually happening is the focus causes the output of the cerebral to return and become more concentrated. The result is these sectors will increase potential, branch, and store memory. An analogy is having a hose. It you put in on mist, all the plants get a little. But if you focus it to a narrower stream you can soak some of the plants. Many won't get any water this pass, but these are not part of the software's need. They have their own memories, left at a steady state for now. Another software will focus on these and cause these to gain potential and learn. For example, if one was learning a dance. You start at the basics and through repetition we focus on just a certain cerebral wiring. Once that is in place, that memory is now advanced enough to look smooth. Then we change our focus and saturate the periphreal neurons until cerebral connections hook up and these become very smooth, etc., If you were trying to multitask, on the phone, watching TV, etc., the focus would be spread out to wide. Learning would still occur, but much slower. The software has to help program complex things like walking and needs to focus. Try to program a robot to walk as smooth. It isn't that easy. Yet the software is designed to go through a series of stages until, perfect. Besides helping to focus the potential to more quikcly process the memories and memory connection needed for complex human behavior, the physical progression of the memory increases cerebral potential. That means more core potential. It is a cascade affect where one hand washes the other, allowing the both to evolve and gain esculating potential. That is why children up to about 4 have a tremendous learning potential. The software is ideal for this quick learning, while the ego potential is much lower. As the ego potential increases, it has a mind of its own. The natural software is trying to continue this rise, but ego focus tends to narrow its focus on things that it likes. This short of shifts us toward linearity. But the software is still very stubborn and pushes us to be more complete. Many of the collective dramas and stages of life are software induced. I going to add one final thing. If we place a magnetic on the table and then spread iron filings near the magnetic, these filings will distrubute themselves in the orientiation of the magnetic field. Even without the iron filings, the magnetic field already exists in space. The filings allow us to see it. The software and ego potential sort of work the same way in the sense they are an extrapolation, before it is actually wired. They sort of define forms into which the neurons will rough branch into, with the unique sensory input of the individual making that basic form unique. Human nature makes us all similar at fundamental levels. But at the same time, each of us comes out unique, do to our unique circumstances.

I don't think modern blackholes destroy information since they are finite. The point singularity is the theorical limit and not reality. I would wager that GR and SR both face the exact same practical limitation; the point reference (like C) will require infinite mass/energy to occur. Blackholes in the universe are still trying to achieve that state, as reflected by them still pulling matter in. The point limit would occur when all the matter/energy is pulled in. Look at it this way, if you fell into a blackhole one would never reach the point singularity in the center. That is because it doesn't exist. But also one would be accelerating causing the GR to undergo SR conversion. The SR can conserved information since relativistic mass behaves differently. The twin parodox conserves information but transposes the time. Or the information would be sort of useless since things would have evolved.

They need to open a third branch called astral-chemistry. The job description is to work under the assumption that chemical processes can explain a range of phenomena. Then use the principles of chemistry to see if they can come up with explanations. I am not saying everything would be apppropriate, but many things are. For example, after a supernova has cooled, predict the types of minerals and chemicals based on physics projections of the atomic composition. This debris is what is assumed to form second generation stars. It would give us a handle on identifying where things may have occurred and when it may be possible that second generations stars might appear in the future. A chemist analysing atomic spectra data will also notice subtle things that might indicate these same atoms are participating in chemical reactions or within stable chemicals. Or the appearance of certain chemical balances may impy the presence of other catalytic atoms, that may not be visable using standard techniques.

My parts of the brain may be a little off base, but my data is something anyone can generate by looking how their own mind works. When you are hungry, a range of memory, connected to hunger and the appeasement of hunger comes to the forefront. If you go to a buffet, some things you like, some things you dislike, other things you hate, and some things can't eat enough off. Each has an emotional valence attached to it that give you these associations. Whether the tag is directly at the synaptic level, of is part of an extend range of connections, is not clear from this data. What is clear, is the emotional/instinctive valence of memory. Since the limbic system and hypothalamus are at the heart of emotional and instinctive reactions, these are involved in these valences. There is another observation that indicates another memory feature that appears to be more connected to the (Jungian ego and not Freud's ego). The brain waves have a range of frequencies delta (slow) to beta(fast). When a person goes beta ,such as during rage, the mind gets very linear. Or they get very narrow with respect to adaptation. The reason this occurs has to do with the neruon firing rate. The ego appears to have a normal setpoint. The faster bulk firing causes most of the neurons or memories to fire to fast to be conscious. The ego is only able to focus on neurons, that normally go slow, which are now firing much faster and are able to the enter the range of the ego set point (more primate type memory). The opposite is also true, when the brain waves frequency lowers, the average rate of firing of the memory shifts causing a different range of neurons to be at the firing rate that can be conscious at the ego set point. It is another type of layering. The observation that is often reported of people, seeing their life flash before their eyes, during a near death experience, seems contrary. At the fast brain wave frequency, these memories should be too fast. The only way to explain this, is that the ego set point is not fixed, but can vary. Or the ego's normal set point became higher during such critical situations, so it can become conscious in the range of these very fast memories. The faster memory implies lot of information becoming conscious in a short time, to give the impression of time slowing. An idiot savant can be explained as someone with a higher than normal ego set point. They can function at high data speeds at some tasks. But the normal day to day memory is going to slow and is hard to process. The person in a rage (beta) has his normal civilized behavior too slow. Civilized behavior usually occurs when we are calm and the brain waves are much slower. Therapy tries to shift the brain potential and slow the brain waves, so the civil memories can slow and enter the range of the ego set point. It is not clear whether the emotional/instinct valance, of the first layer discussed, is tweaking the ego set point or whether these brings memories layers into conscious range at any given set point. The latter seems more likely since this memory is less brain wave dependant. This is the my favorite layer but will lead to the most misunderstanding. It is connected to what could be described as behavior software. If you look at a bird during mating season, its song and dance is instinctive. This is due to behavior software, that is interactive, but programmed at birth. This software only plays during certain times of year. When the sensory input is correct, during say the spring, the brain activates this software. If anyone has even had a kitten, for example, even if it was taken young from its mother and never sees another cat to learn from, it will still act like a cat when it grows up. Cats have a software jukebox, with a larger number of programs. My favorite to watch is a kitten chasing imaginary prey. The software not only controls the behavior, but projects imaginary prey to teach it hunting. By the time it is a cat, its software has taught it the skill it will need for the real world. These lessons do not have to be taught externally, but can occur internally. If it was still with the mother in the wild, it would still have the impulse to play hunt, but it would also collect additional data from the mother. But that data is not required since kittens can be develop most of their skills, without other cats. When we get to humans, the human jukebox has even more software. Most of this software is interactive and typically uses the environment. Humans are a social animal with our software learning through interaction. If one was raised in isolation, the software still plays but it loses much of the interactive data it needs to collect, to evolve. The easiest software to see in action is connection to the software of love. All the drama and dynamics, that the ego could never generate on its own, is assisted by this interactive software of love. Being interactive, it will induce the ego to help manipulate the situation for better programming. When couples begin to settle, it is simply that software turning off. The software appears to have a connection to the instinctive-emotional potentials, therefore the core appears to house the software jukebox. The software appear to be similar to the ego, in that they are a potential. It is very likely the ego evolved from one of this potential projections. The ego is sort of interactive software that stays on all the time and has been able to develope autonomy in the sense that it can alter, tailor and induce the instinctive software out of phase with the rhythms of the core.

Conceptualizing helps give the proper direction to the math. Picture this, say it is 200 years ago and we have little modern understanding. Someone comes up with the idea that gravity is due to the repulsion of matter by space. We can set up the math, sort of an inverse of Newtonian gravity and create a new set of math equations that will work. The math is like a faithful horse that will go where the concepts lead it. It will go up the hill or down, it doesn't matter. At the conceptual level, one needs to make a plan that is logically consistent, so we are not leading the faithful math horse into a swamp. The math can make the swamp functional and actually look like a fresh water lake. It we go back to the inverse gravity equations. These may add up at the level of the math and provide verifiable proof in actually tests. It has past all the science criteria so it becomes carved in stone. Now using this as a foundation we begin to extrapolate. The moon orbits the earth because the earth must have a large space inside that is repelling the moon. If we can do the math that is consistent with this assumption, that is now true since the math adds up and can be proven with a test. That is why conceptualizing is important. It is rough draft to make sure all the ducks are in a row before we prove a crooked line is straight with the math. The inverse gravity theory did not occur because conceptualists would have look wider and saw this is inconsistent before letting the math horse go on its journey.

What I was trying to show is that there are three types of data. The first type can be expressed with mathematical logic such as E=MC2. These will tend to form nice mathematical curves. The second type is statistical data that is connected to the mathematics of probability. For example, the flipping of coins can be defined by statistical math. The third type of data is irrational data from the imagination of humans. The imagination is not limited to cause and affect or statistics. We can fly in our imagination and defy all laws of nature and probability. One is not actually flying in reality, since if the reality two math laws were in affect, we would come down to a crash landing. But in the imagination we can generate irrational data that does not fit these two basic math schemas. The example of names will not fall under rational or statistical. One can predict a point in time and space with statistics. But spread out the time and the space and the average names often change regionally. But a numerolgy correlation may be much better suited to deal with long term irrational data.

One conceptual way to look at this is to consider two springs each with a different weight. The one with the heavier mass will vibrate slower. The lighter mass will vibrate faster. At relativistic speed our relativistic mass will increase our total mass, such that all the little springs (cycles) that define all that we are will slow. We still get the same number of cycles just that with the heavier relativistic mass it takes longer to cycle. In the relativistic reference you won't notice anythings since the brain and body are all coordinated at the lower cycle speed. One needs to add space-time into the equation to get all the forces to adjust to the change. So when you go back your twin may have done 1000cycles and you may have only done say 500cycles and therefore would be half the age.

If they were mirror images they would have opposite spin. The problem this may create is which is going to be the final spin? You get a figure eight where both are having a tub-of-war for dominance. One possible solution for this deadlock is the entire figure eight will begin rotating in a perpendicular plane. This will give a common spin allowing them to combine with the composite perpendicular to the two daughters BH.

Obviously I don't know by brain parts like I used to, but I do have a handle on the potential flow. I am too lazy to refresh my memory unless there is a need for my creative skills to get more focused. The next important thing is explaining how memory is organized in the brain. When memory is created the core (limbic system) assigns an emotional-instinctive valence to the memory. For example, when one gets hungry, memories that had been assigned that hunger valence, will be the ones that become conscious first. This allows each valence, i.e., combination of instinctive-emotional potential, to have its own memories. Each of these valence/memory spectra is then distributed throughout the brain. The result is a type of memory layering which allows full brain access at any valence. Using the example of hunger, it triggers the hunger memories, while also allowing us to use the entire capacity of the brain at the same time. What this valence tag also does is allow one to think of a memory and use the valence tag to get the core to trigger the valence potential. I can think of food in my imagination and cause myself to become hungry. This dynamics induces cortico-thalamo-cortical loops focused at that valence. You think of food and get hungry. The hunger induces the valence that causes other hunger tagged memory to become conscious. We then focus on these, to cause the core to induce more valence potential, etc., If thoughts with hunger valence popped into our heads, we can ignor them and focus elsewhere. It works the same way, but consciousness changes it focus to memories that have a difference valance potential. The result can be a change of valence, two valence potentials (mixed feelings) or an even average of the two (eating like its your last meal).

I know there is none. I was simply working the assumption that there was to see where the logic took me. I was surprised by minus degrees Kelvin.

There are two basic parts to the mind, one is conscious and the other is unconscious. The limitations of conceptualization is connected to being able to filter out the affects of the unconscious mind. For example, if I like apples and not oranges, I can rationalize this any way I like. The lack of unbiased choice is due to some type of unconscious affect. When we reach the limits of knowledge, these affects become stronger and subtle since the brain is trying to instinctively help us out to fill in the blanks. For example, if someone drove you home and dropped you in front of your house one will typically remain fully rational. This is solid science. If the same person dropped you off on a dark road in the woods, one's sense of reason now gets much more influenced by the imagination; lions and tiger and bears, Oh My! This the frontiers of science were the solid science gets thin you have to work more in the dark. The shadow in the woods now looks like a person, or animal, etc., One can go with that theory from the unconscious. As long as you stay roadside it can/did exist. We can't run experiements for everything, so some shadows will remain. If your friend made it a daily habit to drop you off on different dark roads in the woods each night, eventually you begin to get used to this. You begin to see that shadows can play tricks on you. The loud noise is not a big monster but a tiny owl making a loud screech. This makes the limits of conceptualization extend even further. As you develop night vision and experience working in the dark the limits of conceptualization stretch.

Thanks John. I have a tendency to theorize in situ instead of checking the literature to see what is has been done. I like reinventing the wheel for practice. Your reference gave me another reference that says what I was trying to say. It discusses the refraction of light as passes into media such as chiral centers. Optical rotation uses two indexes at the same time. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index I am thinking out loud. The polarize light has two circular polarizations that cancel, to get one one polarized plane. Each optical isomer essentially refracts or adds more phase delay, to one of the two circular polarizations. The refraction itself is due to occilation slightly out of phase with the driving electric field. If we put the two isomers side by side, the electrons causing the refraction are 180 degrees out of phase, so that each will occilate with only one aspect of the circular polarization. If one was positive and the other negative they would be in phase and would still cause the same type of affect. But they are not positive and negative. Both could be negative and out of phase if the magnetic field directions were opposite.. Opposite spin electrons have oppisite magnetic fields, but that is way too selective. Maybe they are mirror images even with respecr to the magnetic field directions around the chiral center. The positive-negative analogy, being in phase, does not preclude the cell selectively using the stereo isomer that is in phase with the occilation of the positive charge of the H-bonding hydrogen, since when the +charge of the H is most exposed, the negative charge of the electron, at the other side of the dipole, are also most exposed.

There is no one size fits all when it comes to behavior, since exceptions can always be found. The same is true of political correctness. This one size fits all does not apply to everyone. Those who wish to play by these rules can set up their own club. That way they are not trying to impose their will over others, who don't wish to play that game. I can see that the goal is noble. The PC would like to see an environment where people are not mean to each other, especially the underdog. A world where we all get along and the emotion ambiance is positive. The problem with this utopia, is that anything that ruins that romatic feeling will not tolerated.The goddess of love has demon inside. For example, if one sours the utopian mood/vision about gays, one is a homo-phobe. That means if you don't go along, there is something wrong with you, that amounts to a psychological disorder. I understand that this utopian place will not tolerate name calling, but rational observation is also not tolerated. Why aren't homosexuals called hetero-phobes, since they shy away from this lifestyle. Gays do represent a subset of a much larger set. That would not be politically correct since it would change the emotional ambiance within this utopian world. The romantic idealism only works if the subset is greater than or equal to the set. Being consistent with logic and science would hurt their romantic idealism. It is sort of analogous to everyone having a party. Everyone is having a good time. Someone speaks up and says it is getting late and we all need to get up early the next day. That dose of reality sours the mood. The person trying to think outside the emotional moment, into the future, is now the scape goat since they ruined the romantic ambience with reality. I was part of the liberal mindset during most of my younger days. It is a state where feeling leads thoughts, instead of thoughts leading feelings. If a person was completely psychologically healthy this might work. Intuition is a very powerful tool that can grasp reality and generate good ideas. But if there are issues in that head and/or heart, these feelings are not always the best core onto which one builds stable ideas. It tends to be too short sighted and tries to shift feelings as fast as possible with quick solutions. If thinking is leading the emotions, the dynamics are different. Trying to get to a state of everyone getting along is not done with strong arm tactics. Strong arm is better for creating strife. While censor is much better for creating a totalitarian style govenment not utopia. There is a wise saying that a tree can be judged by the fruit it bears. Strong-arm and censor is not part of any upotian world. The output from this type of heart looks more like it is heading toward dictatorship. A place where you remained brained washed or else go to the goulags for rehab. When a dictator forces conformity, this ss is not to make everyone happy, but to consolidate their power over them. The PC is part of a diseased tree with rotten fruits that needs some bug spray. This tree has a rotten core.

I am not saying numerology is valid only that it was one of the original numbers theories, where mathematics was applied to human behavior such as how the unconsciousness of naming a child had some type of meaningful correlation to the type of person that child would become. Here is an interesting cooincidence. Hitler's last name was originally Hiedler. Over the years it was spelled Hiedler, Huetler, Huettler and Hitler, with Hitler being simply due to a typo by some clerk. If you do the numerology Hiedler=7, Huetler=8, Huettler=1 and Hitler=9. The ancient mind might say his life was one of four main transitions. The 7 may have reflected an early connection to old testament style religion, i.e., strict. The 8 is two female principles or maybe a connection between his mother and his feminine side. The 1 shows him becoming more separate and distinct. While the 9 showed a state of gestation from which would appear someone entirely new. The name number of Feuror=2. This is the binarius or devil he became. This is totally irrational and not scientific but one is not dealing with data that plays by the rules of simple statistics. I just realized this is suppose to be about astromony not astrology, sorry.

The bottom line is nobody has proof for the creation of the universe. It comes down to everyone speculating. It is sort of like religion with the biggest religion pretending their speculation is top dog(ma). I don't mean to be rude, but things right in front of us, that we can place under instruments, are still leading to new discoveries. So anyone who believes the intangile of 15B years ago has been reduced to the final knowledge is deluding themselves. Changing subjects back to the dark matter clouds. The other day, the sky was full of them with some really good ones. I was going to take a photo and post it, but I am good at photoshop and figured anyone else who knows how to use that program, could say that this is done with air brush and layers. It would be too easy to ignor if you don't wish to see. What I suggest is contact NASA. Cocoa beach is about 2-3 hours south of where I live. Ask them to tell you about these dark clouds. From where I live I can see the space shuttle heading into the upper atmoshere, when launches occur in the early evening all the way to night darkness. The weather conditions should be similar and the dark matter clouds should be verifiable. These dark clouds look like clouds of gray smoke floating among the white clouds. The gray implies much less reflected emission. If you even notice thunder storms these often show very dark clouds. This might be explained due to opacity. But what I noted was, even with the front having the sun shining on it, the front of the cloud still looked very dark. For example, during morning storms from the west, heading east, the front is still very dark looking, even with the eastern sun shining on it. These dark clouds are absorbing energy until they discharge the energy. Lightning is one of the ways to help reduce the potential. If a cloud of chemical matter was absorbing energy in space, one would see what appears to be very low, if any emission, in that region of space. The low level of emission would not tell us about the size of the cloud since most of it would be hidden due to the endothermic affect. If it was to build up potential, the potential could reach a breaking point. All of a sudden we have a zone in space, which now appears to be emitting very high levels of emission, that are more in proportion to the matter that is actually within that zone. For example, if we didn't know the clouds in the earth's sky were made of water vapor, who would figure something as powerful as lightning could appear from the relative weak binding forces between water molecules. It would make more sense to attribute the 100Million volt lightning with enough current to power many houses for a year, to nuke powered clouds. Chemicals emit from the range of UV all the way to radio waves. The X-rays on up is where the nuke phenomena take over from chemistry.

If you do the numerology of 69 you get 6+9=15. Then you get 1+5=6. So 69 leads to 6 or sex. The ancient dating mind would have done his math and calculated this equation for the proper mating procedure. I am not saying this is a very scientific method but the empircal results worked. Let us apply this ancient empirical number system to look at the religious significance of the number 666. The numerology begins 6+6+6=18. Then 1+8=9. The name number of the beast adds to 9. It is a gestation state. To get more information using the ancient system, one would have also used the letters of the alphabet and assign each letter a number a=1, b=2, etc. At j=10 this can either be used as 10 or 1+0=1. They will both reduce down to the same numbers. Then you add the letters/numbers of the first, middle and last names to get the sums. Then you apply the numerology to each name sum and see if all three end up looking like 666. It was not very scientific but an empircal correlation, used to help dispel speculations. A challenging project would be to write a computer program that goes through a digital phone book, calculates the numerology of the names, and then outputs a list of possible combinations that can add to 666. This does not tell you anything but it does require some ingenuity. It will do nothing more than reduce billions of names down to ?. One may do this statistically using a sample batch to calculate the average ratio to see how close it actually is when compared to more rigorous hard numbers. One may be very surprised by these results. The thing with name data, it is not randomly generated. The last name is set by tradition. But each set of parents then uses an unconscious hunch when chosing the first and sometimes middle names. The hunch may be nothing more than trying to use a unique name so the child is unique. Sometimes poor spelling makes a common name come out differently. Others try to use conventional naming so the child fits in. Others may chose only from the list of Saints to help the child go down the right path. Others pick names based on what they mean in ancient tradtion, in an attempt to bestow certain propensities onto their children. What you end up with is an irrational name data set that is not exactly random, but has a type of irrational order that may not be govened by the laws of conventional math. In other words, if we flip coins in reality they come out half and half, with respect to head and tails, over a long period of time. But if we flip coins in our imagination, one can make it come out heads every time, such as within the fantasy of a long winning streak at the gambling tables. Naming children begins with all the hope for the future, when parents are under the infatuation of being new parents. They are not generating heads and tails in statisitical proportions but, they generate data under the imaginatary influence of a winning streak. The ancient believed, although there is no real statisitical order to this, it did have an order.

I am not for dog fighting, but from the point of view of objectivity, this isn't a clear cut as it would appear. First of all, fighting dogs are not your garden variety of household pet. They are prize fighters. The analogy is the average person would never step in the ring with a prize fighter. From the position of no training and ability, it appears brutal. But to the guys who train 6 hours per day, who can take and give the punches, this is a sport they like to do. Fighting dogs, like some pit bulls, are nth generation fighters from a long line of fighters. This is what they know and this is what they are good at. Anyone that is good at something, gains a certain joy in what they do. These dogs are trained athletes. If you brought your little poodle to play with most of these dogs, they would kill your dog. Their expecting a fight from another dog who is tough and will react with trained ferocity. Many of these dogs have a lot of heart and will fight too long. The owner should step in, and keep it a prize fight and not some type of death sport. That is where I think they cross the line. These dogs like to fight and are well conditioned althletes, but often they encourage the dogs to go way to far against their injured opponents. Or they encourage their dog to go way to far while fighting injured. Modern dog fighting is like having a prize fight without a referee. The fighers are well trained and ready to go at it. But without an objective referee to look at the fighter and make sure nobody is injured too bad, the coaches and the fan cause many fighters to go too far, resulting in death and mortal injuries. The mortal injuries often require euthanasia. I remember watching a pit bull fight in the TV. It is not what you think. There main weapon is a very strong jaw than locks. They try to clamp down on each other's neck and just hold it until one gives up. Most of the cuts occur as each dogs try to avoid the clamp grip of the other, while also trying to apply the clamp . This is how pit bulls beat larger dogs. They will take good punishment until they get the clamp on. These dogs are pets to the people who raise then to fight. They don't wish to see them injured severely, but know they will get injured in this rough sport. Most prize fighters break their hands, ribs, jaw, nose, etc.. Noboby wants to the see that, but they heal and then start training for the next fight. What the public impression is ,are cute little poodles with their cute sweaters being dog napped and then placed in the arena with killer-dog-kowski. Or these fighers are overweight pampered flea traps. They are rough and tough althletes that are trained and breed to like fighting. They need to include referees in the underground dog fighting to making it sporting. One will not stop dog fighting, but we can try to make its safer for the dog athletes. I would also bet steroids are being overused. They also need to test these dog athletes for steroids before fights. I know this sound heartless but these are not lazy overweight pets. And no pet owner would put their animal in the arena unless they believe that their dog is well trained, very tough and has a shot at winning. Nobody would pay to see someone get knocked out with the first punch. They want to see a good fight between champions. Betting does not benefit by a lopsided fight, since Vegas would lose everytime. It needs to be closer so the odds makers can shift the money down the right set of pockets.

Most thinking seems to indicate that how one is orientated to an object, moving at relativistic speeds, will influence what we will see in our reference. At least that is the impression I often get. Here is an experiment that can either disprove that or add a whole new twist. The conclusion depends on how one wishes to interpret this observation. If we had an atom that undergoes nuclear decay and we were to give it a relativistic velocity, its half-life will get longer due to time dilation. If the angle of observation was relative, than the half life should look different depending on the angle one would be viewing this phenomena. If the angle of reference does indeed affect the distance variable, and if the half-life is the same in all angles, that would imply that space-time does not have to always have to change in a coodinated way. It would imply that space and time could act indendantly under certain conditions. If they can't act independantly than different references should see different half-lives to go along with the percieved reference distance. I am flexible and would be happy going either way, but like the idea of space and time both being able to act independantly under certain conditions. For example, a virtual pair sort of acts like time has spread out into two places at the same time, i.e., one heart in two places.

Different chiral centers will rotate the plane of polarize light in different directions. This is what characterizes left and right handed molecules. Light is like a sine wave (wavelength) giving off an alternating electric field. The two chiral centers have different atomic arrangements in 3-D space, which interact with the same electric field, but will create opposite affects within the field. What is interesting, it doesn't matter whether these molecules are right side up, up-side down or on their side, they still cause the same affect. The only logical way to explain this, it has to with apparent negative and positive charges. One acts like it displays a negative field deflection and the other a positive field deflection. This simple explanation would allow us to flip the molecule anyway and still get the same deflection, since these charge fields will not change with spatial orientation. In other words, the original energy is being generated by electrons to make the light. This is then polarized so all the waves light up in one directions. One chiral center is pushing the field one way. The other is pushing the field the other way. But both chiral centers have the same atoms and don't show any apparent differences in charge. This creates a paradox with respect to the observation. How do you get what appears to be postive deflection without any extra positive charge and a negative deflection without any extra negative charge? One way to explain this paradox is using the EM force. The EM force is not just electro-static but also magnetic. It is one force with two components. That would suggest that the two chiral centers have different magnetic fields that are having an significant impact on final EM force fields. The result is that the EM field of one looks positive and other looks negative. In the living state, nature tends to use one of the two chiral centers, exclusively. Based on the observation of the hydrogen bonding that occurs throughout the materials of the cell, this would suggest nature uses the one that will complement the apparent postive potential within H-protons. This may be an example of how signicant H-potential is. It will requires all the biomaterials become orientated, into one of two stereo-isomers.

In numerology you add the first and last numbers of 47 (4+7) to get 11. You then add the first and last, until a single number appears, which in this case is (1+1) =2. That is the number of the binarius. It may be a trick from the dark side. It is better if it adds to 1, 3, 4,7. These are from the light side. The number 5 is connected to human-neutral. The number 6or sex has an inner polarization associated with male-female. The number eight is two zero or the tension of two female principles. The number 9, is symbolic of pregnancy or a state of gestation leading to another number. The ancient mind doing math would also be thinking in terms of the meanings of the numbers, with certain calculations forbidden.

I used to live in Knoxville, TN, when I was younger. It is not too far from Oak Ridge, TN, which was the city behind the fence during the Manhattan Project. I really liked it there. Tennessee has more species of plants and animals of any state in the US, and may be way up there for any place on earth relative to species in that land size. The climate is four-seasons with long summers from May 1 to October 1. The winters are short but snow is inevitable. It is just a short drive to the Great Smokey Mountains. It is one of the friendliest places to live .It is noted for its southern hospiltality and it is in the heart of the bible belt. Strangers say yaw'll, and many will often invite strangers to dinner just to be hospitable. The girls were babes, the living expenses were cheap and outdoor recreation was extensive due to the mountains and lakes. It is close to the massive TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority) dam and lake project that was built by the army corps of engineers. In the warm season they open the dams on a certain schedule so the rapids can used for white water sports. It is the home of the hillbillies, who often own large tracks of premo-land but live in little shacks. They are often suspicous of those revenuers. It is also the home of UT and the Tennessee Volunteers. In Knoxville, they fill their 100,000 seat statium every Saturday during football season. I was always amazed at the amount of extended community spirit in such a small city.

I was using the existing assumption that all the isotopes of hydrogen formed during the creation of the early hydrogen. Let me continue with this chemical state analysis to show how it brings other things to the table that can set the stage for fusion. Say we have a core of solid deuterium/tritium, because the melting points are so low it won't take much gravitational work until these solids melt and then the liquid begins to boil and then vaporized, It will still be hundreds of degree below zero. What the boiling brings to the table is an acceleration in core pressure. It is sort of like heating a bottle of water. The bottle will explode due to the phase change from liquid to gas causing roughly a 1000-fold expansion within the volume. But gravity is fighting back, causing a bulk collapse of all this mass aginst an amplification of the internal pressure. The core of the collaspe would begins to form a hollow due to the internal pressure, with this pressure amplifying faster than what we would expected from the gravity pressure alone. When the D-D finally gets hot enough to ionize, the matter dynamics will change due to the plasma state of the matter. The D atoms can now begin to share the bulk ionized electrons in a more spread out way. The result is a pressure drop/gravity collapse that slams the core for fusion.

I should have used the polticially correct terms; chemistry creates conditions that could be mistaken for phenomena in physics. I didn't mean to intrude or be rude and crude. The original model, where I used solid hydrogen, to seed galaxies, by providing some big solid chunks for gravity to focus on, has some extra data, which I found, which is very provocative. Here are the melting point of H, D, and T. H 13.6K D 18.73K T 20.62K With the solid hydrogen seed theory, D and T solids will form first in ennriched states, due to their higher melting points. These would not only be the heaviest chunks per given size, but they would also be highly enriched in D,T. This puts concentrated D,T in the center of a forming star for easier fusion start-up. But what does chemistry have to do with cosmology, anyway? The existing theory is pretty thin and should join me in speculations. I would like to see them simulate that theory in the lab near me.

Normally, political correctness is discussed in political forums. But it is actually a condition that is better addressed with psychology. To begin let us look at the term "political correctness". The first word is the operative word. Politics often has less to do with objective truth and more to do with using subjective image to create the illusion of objective truth. That is why spin doctors are so important to most political campaigns. The terms political correctness adds up to using subjective spin and image to define objecitve reality. The term scientific correctness is more vigorous and typically require solid and repeatable data and/or repeatable logic to define reality. It doesn't need spin or image but stands on its own. The term political correctness was a big softball lobbed over the plate. Most people missed it because political is suppose to subjectively convey the spin image of power. Many were expecting a fastball. This distinction between subjective and objective correctness should raise at least a yellow flag within the psychology community. But it seemed to have sail right past. Here is how the political correctness game works. The goal is to replace things that create negative feelings with terms that feel better. This in itself is a noble goal but it is a short term fix that can lead to problems. It can create an alternate subjective reality that detaches from objectivity. Without objectivity there is no good rational way to solve the problems. Let me go through a hypothetical example that shouldn't induce irrational subjectivity so we can look at the dynamics objectivity. Many people get in the dumps during rainy days and feel better when the sun is shining. To protect these unfortuneately people from these down feelings, we will need to change the word rain into the new term called sunshine limited. The buzzword shineshine is added to shift the feeling during those raining days closer to those of a sunny day. If I tell someone to get their umbella because it is raining, that is now politically incorrect, since it uses that negative word rain. Object advice is now semi-prohibited by this new verbal standard. So to stay consistent with the new subjective reality, I need to say get your parasol since even on a limited sunshine day there are harmful UV affects. I need to translate objective advice into something that is beginning to detach from the objective reality of what an umbrella is suppose to be used for. That is the only allowable way to stay consistent with the alternate reality. What is beginning to happen is we are creating an alternate reality. It is a speical place where everyone is suppose to feel good and make each other feel good, where every day is a type of sunny or limited sunny day. When a hurricane comes, we need to warn people of the extreme rain. One has to say the limited sunshine is coming with vengenence to be politically correct. But that doesn't get the point across to the dangerous reality of this situation. But the buzz work rain is now so taboo, that the mere mention of it will raise an over reaction. Now the category 1 is subjectively felt that it is a category 3, if that evil rain word is used. If a person tries to hold out and stay in reality, eventully it begins to look like you are the one that is out of touch with reality. It comes down to consensus subjective reality being assumed to apply even to objectivity. If you say, I don't really mind rainy days. Then you need help. Not only did you say the rain word but you didn't even over react on cue. If I was to trace the origins of this, it appears to be feminine. In the dating world, males are trying to get something from the female. Part of that dynamics, with many men, is to create an alternate reality, i.e., I will love you forever, etc. Many women expect the sweet little lies, and many actually like it, not due to the content but because of the nice feelings. With women more masculine, they are learning to copy this male behavior. With many males becoming more feminine, the females are trying to win favors with sweet little lies. It is the feelings that matter. Many male-shes are spreading the legs of their heart and eating up the fantasy without trying to censor it using some objectivity to the reality. Men that retain more masculinity, tend to retain more objectivity. They know how this game works, and don't let themselve fall for it. Some feminine men like the sweet feelings but are a little tighter with the legs. They are a little more virtuous to distinctions of the heart and mind. The problem is, there a lot of smart guys out there that are using the game to their own advantage. It is sort of like a guy who uses his line of bull on a woman. But she is too steps ahead and has him all sized up, only to reverse the wheels of fortune in her own favor. A smart business man would let the alternate reality develop and then try to capitalize on it. Love is a chess game. Some players think a few moves ahead. Smart men are using the alternately reality for fun and profit. The global warming scare is taking advantage of the insecurity that is being induced by the alternate reality. Instinctively, one is going to feel more vulnerable when they lose touch with objective reality. Everything now subjectively becomes more of a potential danger. You harvest that vulnerbility and direct it where it is profitable. Since subjective reality has no objective limits in reality, anything that amplifies the fear and then offers solutions to the fear that it helped amplify, will do the trick. Advertising will use the pick-up line for the females and the seductive image to lure the males. Let the buyer beware. But the alternate reality has a base of fear that adds an unhealthy dimension to cross gender pickup lines, that clouds the natural sexual roles and is hard to see. I don't really have a problem with the first but the second gets sleavey. It is heading toward big mother-brother control of our lives to appease fear. There are many riding the wave since more control equals more power.