sammyooba

If you mean harness as in making gravity and the such, there's a group of Australian scientists trying to do this: http://www.electrogravityphysics.com/html/artificial_gravity.html

9 is the special number perhaps according to below http://rodinproject.com/ Don't know if it's actually plausible, numbers being 'alive'.

My q's were from that site, I was wondering that if any info. in that site is plausible. The books on that site was an interesting read so I thought that if some info. on that site was realistic, so could the other. There is 1 interesting thing, it claims that this book was written around 1980s, and said 'electrons store information', and the site claims that this was discovered in 2000. Anybody know if this is true? -- I'm guessing Australian scientists, I did a quick search on 'light slowing', and I got http://www.rense.com/general28/erin.htm First paragraph "A team of Australian scientists has proposed that the speed of light may not be a constant, a revolutionary idea that could unseat one of the most cherished laws of modern physics -- Einstein's theory of relativity."

ok, I get some parts of it, except where all that dust comes from. 3 more q's these are all incorrect right? 1. the centers of gravity of Earth and Moon are fixed (do not move) with respect to the corresponding planetary/lunar surfaces 2. the speed of light is constant (it doesn't change with time) 3. Light beam between Earth and Moon travels through media that do not change with time and in correlation with those 3 q's, are these true?: 1. Neither Earth, nor the Moon are rigid bodies. Their interiors are partly liquid and semi-solid. Hence, observations of our scientists can be explained by slight changes in mass distribution inside Earth/Moon interiors. Incidently, some notorius and unexplained errors in satellite positions can be expained this way too. 2. Recently, our scientists noticed that the speed of light seems to decline slightly. When light becomes slower, it takes more time for it to reach the Moon and come back. Whoever assumes that the speed of light is constant is bound to conclude that the distance between Earth and the Moon increases. 3. The moon seems to develop its atmosphere. If you look at a new moon, you will be able to see its entire outline. In the past, this was not possible. Observing the entire lunar outline is only possible if the moon has an atmosphere. As you know, light travels through atmosphere slower than through vaccum. Hence, thickening of the lunar atmosphere would contribute to a conclusion that the Moon drifts away from Earth. Increase in pollution/composition of Earth's atmosphere (CO2) has a similar effect. thanks

wow, thanx truely, will be a big help. About the cloud of dust, what makes it?

thanx for the replies, i understand orbit now. Still have 2 questions: 1) what makes the cloud of dust (The one that makes galaxies). and 2) the gravity become weaker as you are farther from the source. Like is Pluto less affected by the sun? And can anyone direct a link to the experiment that was done to prove this?

What makes less dense things orbit denser things continuualy? Like if you get a bowling ball and a pingpong ball. You settle the bowling ball in the middle of the bed. Then you lightly toss the pingpongball and it'll orbit the bowling ball for awhile then itll get sucked in because it runs out of forward energy. What makes it so earth continuualy orbits earth and not get sucked into the Sun? -------- And how do dust clouds form in space. The one that makes galaxies. --------

iz donut shaped