fripro

NASA has announced that when the hubble telescope is aimed at the distant Universe towards 13.5 billion years,that there is no visible light, this means that red and blue dominate the received distant light. I again ask could this be a possible indicator that the Universe is rotating as red means doppler shifted away and blue means doppler shifted towards the telescope view? FRIPRO

I have seen this photo before from NASA's Hubble space telescope, and if it is the true color I would address it as a collision of two massive objects, both moving at near the speed of UV light in the dark matter (you have been refering to) to a collision. This would cause the resultant residue to move in the dark matter at velocities greater than the velocity of light in that dark matter. Thus the blue light. This light (or a form of it) can be seen in any atmosphere where a mass velocity exceeds the velocity of light in that matter. It can also be explained as a cone of radiation similar to the sharp sound one hears in the earth's atmosphere when a airplane exceeds the sound barrier. This is a form of and example of Chrenkov's light.

http://vmsstreamer1.fnal.gov/VMS/Samples/Cerenkov.ram I guess I lost my way, however if my coment appears twice that is what happen. With respect to the bullet photo above, could the blue light be Cerenkov Radiation? To understand Cherenkov log on to: http://vmsstreamer1.fnal.gov/VMS/Samples/Cerenkov.ram FRIPRO

I admire the thought of houses, and I raise the point that as one travels in an airplane over the top of all the homes, even as the earth turns, and one continues to circle the globe of houses he will come back to the first house you pointed out So is the Universe, rotating, the source of centripical gravity an the galaxies are the houses my young friend equates to. One must not forget that the airplane must fly in an atmosphere, over these uncountable number of houses. So true is the Universe, it also has an atmosphere-- Dark Matter!

I could not help but comment on your spheroid drawing. In recent photos in 3d steroscopic placed on the fourm (I refer you to--Fripro's Gyroscopic Universe Vision) on this SFN forum string. It referes one to a spheroid version of the Universe with photographic http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=30901

Martin here is and improvemnt on the stereo photo above FRIPRO http://www.fripro.com/STEREO%20UNIVERSE%20UIDE.htm

Martin There was an ancient drawing and belief that a turtle supported the earth just as Edtharan said. It demostrates how only about 2 to 5 thousand years has past,where we have progress from the turtle to a Universe that is particle in nature and all mass and radiation(WAVES) are constructed in many form from these particles (dark matter) and the Vortex attraction between all matter is the Dark energy, scientist are paying more attention to. http://www.fripro.com/stero%20Universe.htm

DNA others Phi For All Martin pointed out in an earlier thread (Flat in this case) just means that no matter how big the triangle its angles add up to 180 degrees. It doesn’t mean 2D. Stereoscopic telescopes like Hubble are capable of, seeing 3D. It is sad that Hubble is off line now. NASA has announced that the Hubble telescope (which just was damaged by the CME from the sun and other reasons) will be repaired in 2008, and plans are still underway for the James Webb Telescope, Hubble's successor, which would be launched in 2011. JWT will be designed to view objects in visible light and infrared, and its mirror will have six times the area of Hubble's mirror. Its goal is to study the first stars and galaxies that formed in the early Universe. It will operate 1 million miles (1.5 million km) away from the Earth, and will not be serviceable from orbit. JWT can take stereoscopic photos years apart and we will be able to see the universe in greater resolution stereographically. One way you can see the stero photo referenced, is to cross your eyes. Here is a deep space stero-like photo in part from NASA Hubble space telescope. Imagine the points (when viewing this stero photo) that I have pointed out earlier. The red shift can also be viewed, at the yellow galaxy. Indicating rotation. I also wish to point out that if the Earth was transparent and if one could see through the earth at the various hurricanes, tornado etc. on the so call tranparent globe. We could also see through the earth to huricanes on the other side--the same for a rotating Universe These huricanes are similar to galaxies. The huricanes and tornados on a transparent earth would be at all angles, similar to the stero photo I have referenced. They are in the earth's thin atmosphere which is particle like also. It would take an entire book to even approach the proof you are looking for. The Universe is particle in nature and all mass and radiation(WAVES) are constructed in many form from these particles (dark matter) and the Vortex attraction between all matter is the Dark energy, we all are paying more attention to. Log on to: http://www.fripro.com/stero Universe.htm

I am preparing the text and photo's now that will give you something to think about. Please give me the time to answer ]when[/u

I will give your perfectly valid question that any theory like what you have proposed must fullfill. but let's not get into argument of sarcasm, as that is not scientific.

I know what you have asked me is a leading question, next I would be asked to prove it, just how can I do that? My answer is theoretical based on years of scientific experiments an observations. It is very hard for our human mind to comprehend the premise that the entire Universe’s bubble-like globe is made of the ether's particle's, mass, and waves. All mass galaxies are expanding across its particle atmospheric surface. This same Universe (a soap bubble example) floats in the infinite nothing.

The Universe is immense beyond all imagination of individual humans on Earth. One can see in the deep space photograph by NASA an obvious tilting of the galaxies at many different angles. This seems to infer that some background galaxies are on the surface of a transparent expanded globe. This globe probably is rotating; however, because of its size, perception of the rotational movement on Earth, in our Milky Way galaxy, is impossible to measure.* Of course the Hubble camera was looking in one direction, so where are we with respect to the globe? My guess is in the outer shell of the globe through which we are now looking, the shell being very thick but transparent to various frequencies of radiation infra red (UV, visual light, X rays, gamma rays, micro waves, radio waves, etc). * Observation of the red shift exhibited less red shift than expected, indicating that the expansion of the Universe across the globe's surface is speeding up. It could also imply that the Universe is rotating. A rotating Universe would be gyroscopic, the source of gravity ,g, on Earth. Now watch the nasayers!

I never realized that our forumn had so many young students that is great. Being 84 years old and in excelent health I hope to part with important theories about the Universe, that I am sure is important to you students and friends. Tom

I am sure the moderator does not permit me to advertise where my theories are being published. Believe you me Martin I have studied the standard mainstream cosmology before making my coments above.m

The variable speed of light (VSL) concept states that the speed of light in vacuum . . . My belief and published theory is that light can not travel in a vacuum. This where I differ, however I do believe as the density of the ether atmosphere of the Universe changes the speed of light is not constant.,