MrSandman

I'm sorry. I should have not have been so blunt. However, beating around the bush isn't my method. You don't believe what someone says you say something that refutes it. Then you get the poster angry and they reply quicker. It was my method to get him to support his answer. Without me asking about every single point. Politeness as in being rude is perfectly abhorrent, but openly refuting what someone says isn't. Just get the conversation going faster. I would also like it if we can keep with amino acids. You have anything to add about them please post. However, I will want you to support what you tell me.

How long can you make the bridge? Is the bridge stationary? Do you have to start the bridge through a physical method? Elaberate (hope that's how you speel it). This could be an interesting thread.

And Harvard.

Yeah, they all send websites as source that are secondary from another secondary source.

This looks like homework and all you want is the answer!

Well I mean with mice or something a little better than microbes.

That's what I said it was still wrong.

Well it seemed easy to think of a transfer of elections then the addition of protons. Who cares that much about politeness? It's a cruel world. People say things, but don't mean it. That's another ethical issue, so please keep it away from science. I couldn't understand it until my professor explained it. Now, stop being a mother of ethics.

Well maybe they just have a higher tendency to violence. Sort of like some people. I've played with pittbulls and the love to chew on things, but they can be quite nice. Rottweilers on the other hand can be some of the nicest of dogs. I think it has to do with how you treat them.

Yeah, I see what your saying. However, I bet the DNA was similiar in structure if they transfer DNA. They should try transfering DNA to an intelligent animal and observe its habits.

That in my opinion is being narrow minded.

I know that. However, my answer was close, but that makes it wrong. I used common logic and it seemed right. Guess I should look back and see If can figure out a ratio system for it.

That doesn't help much. Could you write the procedure in an organized form? I realize it's has do with the polarity of water, but some other issues I want to look.

Explain the experiment please. I'd like to analyze how it works.

I agree with their answers. A negetively charged particle is a Anion. Thought you might want to know that.

well it could be at the NH3 and the Oxygen, but you're right I talked to my professor it is protonated. How do you get subscripts?

Yeah, just keep your talks in class relevant to the subject is the way I see it. I don't want to do chemistry when in English Class. However, I like chem better.

Conservation is important. The environment needs us like we need it. Trees grow faster if you clean up the dead ones instead of leaving them there.

Guys! Look at this scientificly. You can cross genes only as long as the genes are fairly similiar if they're not the reciever will reject them. It's like breeding a chicken and a dog. They're are too diferent, so will reject genes from each other. However animals that are similiar for instance donkey and a horse can breed. If you could figure out how to take pieces from other animals and see if you can have another animal except it you could very well get NPP. There is also dominance in genes that has to be taken into consideration. It's a lot more complicated then just mis-matching. Tell me if I'm totally wrong. It has happened, but not on a very different scale.

Yes, I see that now. I don't like using formulas that some guy figured out. I'd rather figure the formula by myself. One reason I thought it work is that if you have a 45 90 45 degree triangle the ratio would work but that is probably just when it is 45.

Oh well i'm using tan just in a simpler form.

Making a mountain out of molehill here. It is a simple problem. Deserving a simple solution. I'm using ratios between sides and angles. They are both related. Sure it trig, but you don't have to use a calc to solve this problem. Fswd: He brought the "God" topic up.

Yes you can use my method it doesn't refute my answer. I did look at some of the God+Sun sources. If I was to read all it would be like me telling you to read the bible, and understand it right now.

Yeah, but do you see that my answer is in fact rational. It is right. I'm using algebra because this is a very simple problem.

Your using the editable dictionary as a source. What's your answer? Wait a sec we are on the same page sort of, so lets stop.