MrSandman

JK!!!!!!!!! Yeah, isn't it great? Sorry I thought it was longer.

Which is a long time to me it is all relavent

You can use it, but it's easier to use the other way.

Yes they do!!!! 52degress is a set angle along with 90 with what I can see the angles must equal a total of 180. Show that if you compare the length to the angles. The have the same ratio. take a triangle with 45 45 and 90 and have the base 100m. the adjacent side will be a 100. See? I know I'm not suppose to give the answer, but since this is days old I think it is okay. Approx: 136.84m

Sorry, I need to review the XP, but the kid was talking about his expirament not working you look at it logicaly and see the gas given off isn't enough to fill the baloon. I know the experiment is off topic, but the topic died a long time ago.

Crap I meant 38 and it makes perfect sense. Now look at it. The ratios stay the same with a right triangle I thought the same thing when I was veiwing this at midnight this problem doesn't need tang. Wait unless the are saying this tower isn't 90 degrees did I miss something??

You were Catholic? They used the hebrew bible to compare it to. They thought it would disprove. It didn't. Catholics add books that were never there. I'm 16 shows you that age makes little difference in discussion.

Yeah I really do need to review, but anways the XP will work if you have a greater concentration.

I skimmed it. I've read several bits and pieces of random books. Yeah just like you can make up a theory and have something support it. It isn't a fact untill you Observe it happening. Why don't we now all stick to the facts of science and don't relate them back to Evolution or Creation. I really like your posts they show that you think for yourself.

Freedom of choice isn't it amazing?

Sure you can believe in both, so really it doesn't change your result of salvation. You have no visual observation of this (changing of species to another) happening the chances are higher for blowing up new york and having it fall back together. However, I can't prove creationism the same you can't prove evolution.

an acidic slution gives off hydrogen. Well a hydrogen Ion.

I have to go I'll reply later.

You can not PROVE Evolution. Something you can't prove is not a fact. It all comes to what you believe, so both should not have anything to do with SCIENCE. Don't post things about Evolution because it is your belief. I won't post creation as science. However, if I was to chose one to support science I would chose my belief of creation. You get what I'm driving at???

Quote the passage

The Bible can be a source. You're just wrong here. What about the bits that contradict the other bits, or are you ignoring them? There is none. I'm sure that man was created in the same WEEK as the earth, so how can the earth be old but man not be old? Man dies. The earth was around before man was created anyways. We do not know, and are quite happy to say we don't know. Why make stuff up? I'm not making this up. "God" "told" many people many things... or at least that is what the modern tranlations say... but some of it is bound to be correct... If I make enough random predictions one of them has to be right. And we knew for a long time that clenliness is important, just look at the roman idea of miassima, they had no idea what was really going on but get rid of the bad smells get rid of the disease worked rather well there... God didn't have anything to do with that. Moses' era was more than 3,000 years than the romans. Isn't there something about someone oh I don't know being locked up by the roman catholic church for saying that it was round? (although saying that, I do intend to be vague in my comment self research is important, and I can also recall some evidence that that is a myth...) Well I admit not too sure about that, but his eyes were plucked out and he was put under house arrest for believing in copernicusism. The bible proves nothing, it is just a story book. The accounts prove things about history. Where has it been proprovend it was just a story book? Many people, ALOT smarter than you have read and disreguarded the bible in preference of science. Alot more foolish, because they can't accept in something more complex and amazing than themselves. There is massive amounts of evidence for evolution, it is a more sound theory than gravity. Give me proof and explain how it proves the transformation of one species to another.

He was afraid of procalming his belief.

They date fossils off of layers and layers off of fosssils!!! What is wrong here? You notice in old manuscripts that the word dragon is used many time there is even draw of what looks like dinosuars. The word "Dinosuar" wasn't made until webster. How else can you explain so many accounts of dragons. All the other accounts in the Bible didn't have any errors what do you think about that?

Considering that it is close. To that the dead sea scrolls just had two differences in Isaiah. Did you read the rest of my post? Galileo was afraid of believing in heliocentrism and the earth being round because of the corrupt catholics

Sry, The two Creation and Evolution are both beliefs Charles Darwin called it a theory for goodness sake. He knew that it couldn't be proven, but he didn't know it could be disproven.

Yes It could be, but but the rest of the bible supports it being round. The right wording might have been lost in translation.

I'm just saying really that Evolution has not been provened fact so it should not be used as one.

because they need cetain motor functions/movement to start the process. I'm sorry this only about 3,000 years old. The passage saying the earth is round is Isaiah 40:22: He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in. This passage may reasonably be interpreted as referring to a flat circular earth with the heavens forming a dome above it. Such an interpretation is consistent with other passages of the Bible which refer to a solid firmament (Gen. 1:6-20, 7:11; Ezekiel 1:22-26; Job 9:8, 22:14, etc.). It is also consistent with the cosmology common in neighboring cultures. Isaiah 11:12 refers to the "four quarters of the earth", but we do not take that as indicative of the earth's shape. The shape of the earth may already have been known in Isaiah's time. Ancient astronomers could determine that the earth was round by observing its circular shadow move across the moon during lunar eclipses. There is some suggestion that the Egyptians knew of the earth's spherical size and shape around 2550 B.C.E. (more than a thousand years before Moses). The Greek philosopher Pythagoras, who was born in 532 B.C.E., defended the spherical theory on the basis of observations he had made of the shape of the sun and moon (Uotila 1984). If this information was known by educated Greeks and Egyptians during biblical times, its use by Isaiah is nothing special. Showing that Catholic Belief screwed up science for everyone

The pryamid was just another thing to keep you guys going. "They" as the people mad this load of crap. Don't think our math is perfect.

Yeah, probably later you'll have to put up with a lot worst crap.