Pincho Paxton

Lots of theories make their way into the speculations forum. I never know when to reply to posts with my own theory, because I wonder if everyone just want to associate their theory with current physics. But anyway from my point of view... You have mass, and inside that mass are spaces, and inside those spaces is Aether. The Aether flows through those spaces. The Aether is spherical, and it's flow rate is determined by a queuing system. It can't bound over its neighbour unless that neighbour changes to negative mass, and quite a lot of it will change to negative mass. A moving body gathers a certain amount of Aether ahead of itself.. the bow shock. The Aether is very light, and gathers momentum with the moving body, and also folds into figure 8 loops... time... The flow direction is important. Like streams, the Dark Flow of the Aether is directional, and you can hit a fast stream, or a head on current. Worst case scenario, you hit a head on current. What would happen to the mass? When you reach the limit of mass speed the Aether is folded to negative mass. But too high a speed will also fold the atoms to negative mass, because they are also made of Aether. The difference with atoms is that the shell can slide over the Aether until it is breached. I suppose you can think of an atom shell as streamlined for Aether up to a point. That's my reply. Ignore it if you like.

I also have time in my model (if its right), and it is just a figure 8 of particles in the X/Y/Z. So time isn't even a new dimension (if I'm right). You could call time an internally bonded loop.

They measured the speed. Tick tock. Think about the clock.

A theory disproved? ... belongs in here! Just got my finger trigger on The Big Bang at the moment!

The evidence suggests that it has been broken to a high level of certainty... Speed of light broken?

It predicts mass from the inertial spin of attempting to realign zero with entropy. So it doesn't predict Higgs, just mass. It does the same with gravity. As the holes are cut from membranes a flow can travel along the particles. As those particles collide inside this passageway they bump, and gradually become smaller, and smaller. Eventually they are just negative. When they are negative they can cross positive to help it to reset back to zero again. So a flow into the Earth would travel through these areas, turn negative, and flow out again into space as anti-matter. The in-out flow is the bubbles that we see, the anti-matter is found just outside the Earth.You get Gravity as in-flow, and magnetism as out-flow.

It predicts everything, but it is the test that is difficult. You have to program a simulator to follow the exact rules above, that when the Aether overlaps it is checked back to zero. You then have to wait for the simulator to make something new. Then you would drag a sphere around the new state, and the sphere would tell you what is happening inside it. You would have to visually, and physically identify what that new state is. it could be an atom for example if it was a spherical object with an output of electron orbits that matches the known orbits of electrons. Then you could combine the atoms to see what the molecules do. But the mathematical model is just to correct sphere back to zero. In 2004 when I first started this idea I found that it predicted the bubble around the galaxy, and bubbles from black holes. They were found about 2007. But it isn't a mathematical model.. it's whole point is to not use mathematical algorithms, the idea is for it to work as simply as possible. Of course you have to check the sphere, you have to have some measurement routines. I try not to use any maths, but I can't get round the fact that the particles have circumference, and area.

You can't, your theory is a religious theory based on philosophy. You can only make a web page, and send people to it.

Again you struggle. Adding fairies adds wings, legs, physics, adding fish adds fins, eyes mouths, swimming. You need to follow my rules that you aren't allowed to add anything that you can't evolve from nothing, and build up from there. Work up from nothing.... Define nothing, and then see what happens when it interacts with itself. The parts spin around as they try to reset back to zero.

You write too much, and make it hard for anyone to answer. If you had separated your replies I could answer. In this case I can only say that all of your replies are wrong. Saves time. What I would rather do is account for your own psychology instead. You have been living in a scientific world that has made its own set of rules from almost no information. The electron microscope, and LHC, and mathematics are giving you a sense of logic that doesn't exist. For example you donate protons as proven, yet disassociate a membrane with a hole. But the two things are the same, and what you don't understand is the properties of a hole. You think a hole is a space, because you cannot see what is inside a hole. We evolved not to see what is inside a hole. If a fish could see water, it could not see at all. We evolved to see positive mass, and ignore negative mass. negative mass is a hole. Holes have the properties of mass in the Quantum World. they rip mass apart. A proton therefore is a membrane with a hole, but is extremely dynamic. From where you stand, you have nothing to tell me, and I should do all of the talking. How did I come up with my ideas? I tore science apart, and started from scratch. it took about 15 years of building up a theory that starts from nothing at all.. the void. To create all of the physics that we see today, and EVOLVING each part of that theory from the particles that I created from nothing. The hole, and the membrane.. +1 + -1 = 0. A theory that starts from nothing, and creates everything with no cheating involved.

My theory evolves gravity from spherical particles with a hole in the middle. The hole has the opposite properties of mass, it breaks mass apart, but so long as it is spherically centred inside mass, it remains in that safe spherical state.. entropy safe. With sphere, and holes you can get 3D chains, and bonding. When mass interlocks with the holes it pulls part of the mass away. The mass then creates a figure 8 in the two overlapping bodies with a cross section that is lens shaped. The figure 8, and the lens can then get locked with new particles. Once you have a row of particles you get trapped holes pulling apart the matter into complex swirls. The complex swirls create vectors of motion which head towards ever increasing numbers of holes. That is Gravity. Both matter, and holes (anti-matter) equal a total of zero, and so are the major fundamental particles of the Universe.. they are nothing. And in English.... Gravity evolves from a total of combined Aether. Matter, and Anti-matter first, gravity second.

I read it. In fact I already use some of it.. like the part where we were not around before we were born, and are not around after we die. I have posted that a few times. But.. it doesn't work without applying hope, and faith. You have to assume that we can keep our minds in one piece. There is a scientific way... Electrons store information in holes, so those holes could hold our information together. We could re-incarnate. But that is still an evolved state of matter.

We are energy vessels. You fill a glass with water, it is a vessel, a container. You tip the water out, it is on the floor, but in the glass it had form, and shape. It was maybe a cylinder of water, it had a cylindrical shape, and shape is mathematical. the water in the glass had mathematical qualities that were lost when you tipped it on the floor. We are containers, and we shape our minds with energy that fills up vessels. When we die, the energy exists, but the mathematical shapes are lost. Shapes are not a part of energy conservation. Entropy only likes spherical shapes.. they are free somehow of mathematical construction. Some shapes are mathematical.. the Universe to create squares would require logic.. a construction system, and if you look deeply at a square, it is made up from sphere.. atoms. Each person is a mathematical construction.. the Universal law of conservation actually means that re-incarnation has to disobey those laws. Humans, just by standing upright under Gravity are constantly trying to break the laws of the Universe. We evolve to break the laws of the Universe. You theory is fine, but not under the term energy conservation. Your theory works under the term EVOLUTION.

In pseudo-science, and speculations there are a lot of people who have gravity theories. This question then becomes quite different for each person who responds, and for me, and my theory it was one of the questions that I had 20 years ago, and then gradually answered for myself. Gravity has to be evolved, and all of physics have to be evolved.. slowly.. from nothing. And I did that, and it worked for me. I am happy with the way I progressed my theory without cheating.. I didn't add anything that I couldn't evolve. In current science Gravity is a cheat that my science would not allow.

Outside N amount is +1 + -1 = 0. A total of zero, made from an invisible structure +1 and -1. That structure is infinite. It's easy to get confused and think that nothing is just 0. But nothing is made from +1 and -1 combined, else the universe wouldn't exist at all.

You don't seem to be working on any negative numbers at all. If you have infinity as 1, the negative version is -1, and the total is zero.

First, you don't need protons, you just need shells.. membranes to hold energy, and information data. You predict with the simulator by placing a sphere around the area that you want to examine. The sphere then describes the energy, and spin, and direction of whatever is in there. Chaos is small changes that alter an event.. the 13th ball does that. Watch snooker breaks where the slightest change in distance between balls alters the outcome. The 13 ball is an invisible gap in space time, so it perfectly works with chaos. Randomness is the same thing. There are no multiple dimensions, and you can't bend fundamental particles because they are not made from parts. They can overlap, but not for long. They aren't bubbles like atom bubbles which are bendable. particles are spherical, the electron has been measured as almost perfectly spherical. The Aether makes electrons so the Aether must be spherical, and entropy prefers the spherical shape, so induces it. Computers work on electrons, and holes, we translate that to maths. The Aether goes back to electrons, and holes again. I am making a model to hopefully create a Galaxy just by allowing the particles, and holes to work the way that they are supposed to work. But I don't know if I will get a Galaxy, I'm not adding any formulas to the program. Just checking if the particles are overlapping, then use entropy to separate them, and create an electron. keep doing that, over, and over again.. and hopefully get a Galaxy. Here's a test I made to see how dynamic a few events could be...

When you blow a bubble you have air going in, and air pressure on the outside. The Universe has gravity going in, and magnetism coming out. So the Universe would have a bubble around it. Outside the bubble, there can be new bubbles.

It's only my own working out, based on some scientific experiments from the past. Many years ago science, and Einstein used a material called Aether. The Aether could not be found, so science decided that it didn't exist. But in science there are lots of things that can't be found.. Higgs Boson, Dark Matter, Space Time. So instead, I worked on why the Aether can't be found. And once I figured out why it couldn't be found, I figured out that it is everywhere, including outside the Universe. But it collides to create new particles, and black holes. Outside the Universe it just hasn't collided so much. But the rules are the same.

You only have to think what nothing is in terms of maths.. +1 + -1 = 0. Combine this with a few explanations.. A blind person given the gift of sight says that they do not see black, because black is something, and they do not know what black is. If you just simply make the blackness of space into something then it would be two units that cancel each other out. +1 and -1.. mass, and negative mass, a convex wave line, and a concave wave line. What is a particle? It is a convex curve containing a concave hole, it could theoretically fold inside out, and become nothing, and the reverse.

Yes, my version of Aether is just a fundamental sphere with very few rules.. It's not the same rules that science used for the Aether, but it is a more detailed version of the Aether, and can be used as the same theory but with new additions to that theory. I wanted to keep the same name because it still fits in the old theory.The changes are that I turned it into a sum.. +1 + -1 = 0, and made that sum into a physical code making machine made from stacking particles into a sort of Trinary Code. I de-evolved maths, I de-evolved physics.. so instead of taking the Universe back to a big bang, I de-evolved it. What I ended up with to create Galaxies wasn't a big bang, and I didn't get any attractive forces either. I ended up with only bumps between particles, and the bumps folded the Aether into a negative mass state that were black holes that then created Galaxies.The attractive forces are an illusion of flow into holes. Nearly everything in the Universe comes down to areas of least resistance, and pressure.The 13th ball always being an area of least resistance, but is never in a concise position, so is chaos.

If there was a better reason for 12 *12 would this mean that there was an odd connection, or are all of the numbers just picked from thin air?

I have tried to break particles down to their simplest form. The creation of particles. And using my idea.. Outside the Universe is the same as inside the Universe apart from nothing has collided yet to fold into a black hole to create a Galaxy. So the rules are the same.

no.

You have to break maths down in Quantum Physics just like you have to break the physics down. You don't end up with the sort of maths that you are used to. You end up with something more like trinary code. The maths for the quantum world, are the maths that create all of the other maths that you use today. all you end up with is something like this... +1 + -1 = 0. And you combine that with spherical stacking rules to get a self building system of physics, and maths. The spherical stacking rules include the kissing problem, that only 12 sphere can surround 1 sphere of the same size. The 12 sphere leave a gap the size of a 13th sphere, but it can never be fitted. But the 13th ball gap is chaos. So as you can imagine, if you use spherical stacking rules with particles.. chaos is physics. Now being as you can't prove my theory with maths because you have to take maths out of the program, the only actual way to prove it is to simulate it in a computer simulation. Which I have already started to do.